Toronto School Board Caves to Minority over Police in School

Mowich

Hall of Fame Member
Dec 25, 2005
16,649
998
113
76
Eagle Creek
Toronto school board votes to end having police officers stationed in schools

TORONTO - The Toronto District School Board has voted to permanently end the practice of having police officers stationed in high schools.

There was loud applause when the result of a vote to scrap the School Resources Officer Program was announced on Wednesday night.

"We're not saying we don't want to have a relationship with the police, but we just won't want armed police officers in our school every day," school board chairwoman Robin Pilkey told reporters after the vote.

Toronto school district staff recommended removing officers from schools after a survey of students, staff and parents found that the police presence left some teens feeling intimidated or uncomfortable.

The program, which was suspended at the start of the school year, saw police officers stationed at 45 high schools in the district to try to improve safety and perceptions of police.

It began in 2008 after 15-year-old Jordan Manners was shot and killed at C. W. Jefferys Collegiate Institute.

A majority (57% according to CTV) of the students surveyed for the school district report said that having an officer in school made them feel safer, but the more than two-thousand students who said they felt uncomfortable with a police presence was enough to justify the decision, Pilkey said.

"We have to reflect that two-thousand students are a significant number of students to not listen to," said Pilkey.

However, a handful of trustees opposed ending the program, with one complaining that the decision is being made based on surveys rather than hard facts about whether the program has been a success or failure.

"It's very unsatisfactory for us to make a decision as important as this without data, we have opinion but not data," Gerri Gershon told the board meeting, adding that the school district should not walk away from improving relations between police and students.

"This is a horrible pun, but I think this is a big cop out," she said.

Toronto school board votes to end having police officers stationed in schools | CTV News
 

Murphy

Executive Branch Member
Apr 12, 2013
8,181
0
36
Ontario
It will take something like that for the people in charge to re-examine this decision. Of course, no one at the school board will be held accountable.
 

Danbones

Hall of Fame Member
Sep 23, 2015
24,505
2,198
113
Toronto school district staff recommended removing officers from schools after a survey of students, staff and parents found that the police presence left some teens feeling intimidated or uncomfortable.

Yes, we must protect their delicate sensibilities! Best get rid of the alpha teachers, and the bigger students too...and tests and marks, and, style, and better looking smarter people who developed younger...and ...and...and...kids with richer parents...and NO FACTS!!!

SO after years of telling the kids about the evils of weed ( while they drink like strippers after work, and occasionally die of fentinol(spell checker keeps saying PANTINO lol) poisoning), now it's legal..the cops are probably very embarrassed ( especially by comments by the kids that feel uncomfortable or intimidated by them) and would like to not be there too...
 

Dixie Cup

Senate Member
Sep 16, 2006
6,281
3,999
113
Edmonton
I was gobsmacked when I heard this on the radio yesterday morning! Seriously?


When my son was going to school, the Resource Officer in his school was fantastic; always kidding and joking and teasing the kids. He knew everyone by name and was a great asset to the school. Most Police forces take those sorts of personalities into consideration when placing a Resource Officer in a school - they're not there to trample rights but to have honest, open conversations with the kids so that they WOULD NOT be intimidated and to open communication between youth and the police. Every school that he went to (the Resource Officers were usually only there a few days a week and not full time) the Officer in that school was very open and easy to talk to. I would have thought that the students would feel better (and safer) with one around.


I am curious as to whether the schools actually asked why a student felt "intimidated". I bet'cha they didn't though!


This is absolutely garbage and we're raising a bunch of wusses! What are these schools thinking about? Seriously - waaaa, I want my "safe space" waaaa waaa waaa!


It's ridiculous and disgusting that society is giving in to the minority on something that is normally considered positive. I get it - supporting minority rights - but this isn't abusive in any way, shape or form. It's a stupid decision - period.


JMHO
 

TenPenny

Hall of Fame Member
Jun 9, 2004
17,467
139
63
Location, Location
It's considered positive to need an armed police officer in schools?


More and more, I think it should be illegal for a city to have more than 125,000 people or be within 100km of any other city.


You people are all nuts.
 

Mowich

Hall of Fame Member
Dec 25, 2005
16,649
998
113
76
Eagle Creek
It's considered positive to need an armed police officer in schools?


More and more, I think it should be illegal for a city to have more than 125,000 people or be within 100km of any other city.


You people are all nuts.

The policing in schools is one issue, TP. The other is the fact that a MINORITY of students held sway over the MAJORITY in the decision. Since when it is acceptable to give this type of power to the few in total absence of any real facts backing up their alleged claims.
 

Johnnny

Frontiersman
Jun 8, 2007
9,388
124
63
Third rock from the Sun
The policing in schools is one issue, TP. The other is the fact that a MINORITY of students held sway over the MAJORITY in the decision. Since when it is acceptable to give this type of power to the few in total absence of any real facts backing up their alleged claims.

The minority you mention are more politically active in the community than the lazy majority.