Top Ten Canadian Political Scandals

Colpy

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 5, 2005
21,887
848
113
70
Saint John, N.B.
Re: RE: Top Ten Canadian Poli

Reverend Blair said:
Excellent point, Juan. It's especially pertinent since Harper is pushing essentially the same agenda that has put Bush in so much financial trouble in the US.



WHAT?!?!

Bush has gone NUTS in the USA with massive military spending, tax cuts, and huge deficits.

You can't have guns AND butter.

Exactly WHERE do Harper's policies match that of the Bush administration in the area of national finance?
 

#juan

Hall of Fame Member
Aug 30, 2005
18,326
119
63
Come on Colpy, do some reading yourself.

You know that Harper would have had us in the Iraq invasion. How many body bags would we have seen by now? You know that whenever Harper unvails a little of his "platform" it involves increased spending and tax cuts and the cutting of social programs, just like his buddy Bush.
 

#juan

Hall of Fame Member
Aug 30, 2005
18,326
119
63
Sorry Rev

I didn't see your post. We probably agree on this one. :wink:
 

MMMike

Council Member
Mar 21, 2005
1,410
1
38
Toronto
There's a big difference between what leaders want to do and what they actually do. I don't doubt that Harper wanted the country to go to Iraq; I'm less convinced that he would have had us there if he was in power. Public opinion will blunt a lot of 'drastic' solutions - sometimes to our benefit, sometimes to our detriment!
 

Colpy

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 5, 2005
21,887
848
113
70
Saint John, N.B.
Re: RE: Top Ten Canadian Poli

Reverend Blair said:
Wanting a huge military and tax cuts, Colpy. Not to mention that he would have us in Iraq right beside Bush.

Ah, in 1968, before that idiot Trudeau got in, we had a military of over 120,000 on a population base of 20 million. That military was very well equiped and trained, considered to be one of the best in the world.

We also had no debt, and a balanced budget.

Now the miltary might go 65,000, on a population base of 35 million, and it is crying for equipment. Despite the fact our government is awash with money.

As for being in Iraq, you are right, I think we should have been involved. So did a lot of other Canadians, although it would be hard to get them to admit it now. Human nature, you know.
 

Colpy

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 5, 2005
21,887
848
113
70
Saint John, N.B.
#juan said:
Come on Colpy, do some reading yourself.

You know that Harper would have had us in the Iraq invasion. How many body bags would we have seen by now? You know that whenever Harper unvails a little of his "platform" it involves increased spending and tax cuts and the cutting of social programs, just like his buddy Bush.

Perhaps you could show me the spot in the Conservative platform where we call for cuts to social programs?
 

Reverend Blair

Council Member
Apr 3, 2004
1,238
1
38
Winnipeg
RE: Top Ten Canadian Poli

That's what "small government" means, Colpy. The more you type, the more you support Harper, the scarier he seems. Thanks for that. :)
 

Ocean Breeze

Hall of Fame Member
Jun 5, 2005
18,399
95
48
As for being in Iraq, you are right, I think we should have been involved. So did a lot of other Canadians, although it would be hard to get them to admit it now. Human nature, you know

no way. We should NOT have been in Iraq and phew......thanks to Cretien we are NOT there.

what is this fascination with military ??? Would like to see Canada become a lot more active in international crisis response situations .......like natural disasters, and peace keeping missions. We do not want or need the war,military mentality that has crippled the US to the point that this is their entire focus and "image". The last fecking thing we need is a similar image or philosophy and Harper might just be the one to provide that. He is scary........and does not represent the majority of Canadian views. He is too radical ,bordering on extreme. ( ergo the bush similarities. )
 

Colpy

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 5, 2005
21,887
848
113
70
Saint John, N.B.
Re: RE: Top Ten Canadian Poli

Reverend Blair said:
That's what "small government" means, Colpy. The more you type, the more you support Harper, the scarier he seems. Thanks for that. :)

"Smaller government" means a lot of things.....

like quit handing out millions to every special interest group so you can garner a vote or two.

like quit spending $100 million a year on a completely useless gun registry.

like quit handing out millions, if not billions to big companies like Bombardier.

like lower (radically) the feds' advertising budget, used mostly to dispense pro-gov't propaganda.

I don't see ANY move to cut social programs.
 

Reverend Blair

Council Member
Apr 3, 2004
1,238
1
38
Winnipeg
RE: Top Ten Canadian Poli

Except that they would cut native programs (your hero Flanagan would shut down the reserves completely), privatise health care, cut transfer payments to the provinces that pay for infrastructure, drop programs that regulate things like water quality, food safety, and pharmaceutical testing.

We've seen what "smaller government" means, Colpy. We saw people dying in New Orleans because of that same doctrine. We saw people die in Walkerton. We've seen pills pulled off the shelves too late.
 

Colpy

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 5, 2005
21,887
848
113
70
Saint John, N.B.
Re: RE: Top Ten Canadian Poli

Reverend Blair said:
Except that they would cut native programs (your hero Flanagan would shut down the reserves completely), privatise health care, cut transfer payments to the provinces that pay for infrastructure, drop programs that regulate things like water quality, food safety, and pharmaceutical testing.

We've seen what "smaller government" means, Colpy. We saw people dying in New Orleans because of that same doctrine. We saw people die in Walkerton. We've seen pills pulled off the shelves too late.

Interesting.

I suspect that were there to be a Katrina-like disaster in Canada, it would be much, much worse than the American one.

Let us hope we never find out.
 

Reverend Blair

Council Member
Apr 3, 2004
1,238
1
38
Winnipeg
RE: Top Ten Canadian Poli

If we have no effective government agencies, we'll certainly do worse during a disaster. That shows up in every disaster around the world. Your doctrine of small government effectively reduces the effectiveness of government agencies, so it would make any disaster worse.