I saw what the PG of Ukraine said about Parnas, but wonder of the sincerity of what he said (government officials have been known to lie you know.) If Parnas was a known liar, which he may well be, I am not defending him, why would they give face time to such a man? He also didn't deny meeting Parnas, rather said that they did meet but it was about nothing of importance. Again, why then meet with him? And it would make sense to me that the leaders of a country which is desperately in need of military support and funding from the USA, which Trump (the guy who withheld aide and is rumored to have threatened to suspend all aide)is still President of, would refrain from admitting to anything that could implicate Trump for fear of reprisals down the road.
When you say Nunes, is this the same Nunes who at first distanced himself from Parnas, saying that he didn't recall ever having spoken to him, who did a quick about face once it was made known that Parnas was to give an interview to Rachel Maddow? That Nunes? The same Nunes who sued a fake Twitter cow? The same Nunes who has sued, well, just about everyone?
https://www.sacbee.com/opinion/article237841409.html