To IMPEACH ????

Twin_Moose

Hall of Fame Member
Apr 17, 2017
22,041
6,160
113
Twin Moose Creek
If he were just talking with nothing to back it up I would agree with you, but with texts, voice mails, e-mails etc to back up his claims well, that proof can't be dismissed. And is he trying to deal? Absolutely he is because that's what crooked thugs like him do and Trump and Giulaini should have known that from the get go.

What did the Ukrainian AG say about the man in an interview yesterday?


If you didn't catch it he said don't listen to him he is a known liar here in Ukraine, must be collusion


How about the Nunes lawsuit against CNN on his lies being reported as truth?
 

Twin_Moose

Hall of Fame Member
Apr 17, 2017
22,041
6,160
113
Twin Moose Creek
I don't get it, in the face facts mean nothing.... I just don't get it.

So after shopping his support around the Gop. for immunity failed, he found a home with the desperate Dems. yeah OK let's see how fast it all falls apart.

LINK

Ukrainian officials condemned Lev Parnas and say he is lying!
What Parnas said IS A COMPLETE LIE!
Benjamin Goldman at Pen Media reported:
Serhiy Shefir, the first aid to Ukraine President Volodymyr Zelensky, revealed that Democrat witness Lev Parnas lied about a meeting where he claimed he threatened to withhold military aid.
Parnas told the New York Times last week that he and Shefir discussed withholding $400 million in aid form Ukraine unless they investigated the Bidens. Shefir, however, doesn’t remember it that way.
Serhiy Shefir told Kyiv Post, an English language Ukrainian newspaper, that his meeting with Lev Parnas and Igor Fruman was “neither long nor informative”.
According to him, the only thing that Parnas and Fruman discussed was trying to set up a meeting between President Zelensky and Rudy, something they apparently didn’t even take seriously.
“We said that we will gladly meet with him, but only officially, after the inauguration, and that there can be no meeting now.”
Shefir said that Fruman and Parnas told him the point of the meeting was “they want to help this country” since they are Ukrainians themselves. Shefir, however, was not convinced.
“The meeting took place before we started at the job, and we didn’t get very deep into what their ‘help’ would be. These were general words said over a cup of tea.”
Serhiy Shefir also said that he didn’t really give any weight to either Lev Parnas or Igor Fruman, saying they didn’t consider them representatives of President Trump.
“We didn’t perceive them as representatives of the White House. Even now, I don’t understand what their role was. It was a meeting of private citizens with a private citizen.”
 
Last edited:

Twin_Moose

Hall of Fame Member
Apr 17, 2017
22,041
6,160
113
Twin Moose Creek
Don't waste your breath. Moosie will just ignore the existence of the documentary evidence.
Just like when he swallowed the lie that Donny Dodger's tax cuts would pay for themselves. Then when the budget projections came in at trillion-dollar deficits, he said "those are just projections. Hasn't happened yet." Then since it did happen, he doesn't say anything at all.
Mexico paying for the wall? Cheers, followed by silence.
The best, cheapest health care in the world? Cheers, followed by silence.
Such is the alleged mind of a Trumplicker.
We weren't speaking of you specifically, just the group you so obviously belong to.

I'm sorry I thought you were remarking about me when you did indeed refer to me
 

Mockingbird

Council Member
Nov 27, 2019
2,337
126
63
Calgary
What did the Ukrainian AG say about the man in an interview yesterday?
If you didn't catch it he said don't listen to him he is a known liar here in Ukraine, must be collusion
How about the Nunes lawsuit against CNN on his lies being reported as truth?

I saw what the PG of Ukraine said about Parnas, but wonder of the sincerity of what he said (government officials have been known to lie you know.) If Parnas was a known liar, which he may well be, I am not defending him, why would they give face time to such a man? He also didn't deny meeting Parnas, rather said that they did meet but it was about nothing of importance. Again, why then meet with him? And it would make sense to me that the leaders of a country which is desperately in need of military support and funding from the USA, which Trump (the guy who withheld aide and is rumored to have threatened to suspend all aide)is still President of, would refrain from admitting to anything that could implicate Trump for fear of reprisals down the road.

When you say Nunes, is this the same Nunes who at first distanced himself from Parnas, saying that he didn't recall ever having spoken to him, who did a quick about face once it was made known that Parnas was to give an interview to Rachel Maddow? That Nunes? The same Nunes who sued a fake Twitter cow? The same Nunes who has sued, well, just about everyone?

https://www.sacbee.com/opinion/article237841409.html
 
Last edited:

Mockingbird

Council Member
Nov 27, 2019
2,337
126
63
Calgary
So after shopping his support around the Gop. for immunity failed, he found a home with the desperate Dems. yeah OK let's see how fast it all falls apart.
LINK

Yeah, lets see. Lets see what more he has in his phone records etc. Like I already stated, if he were just talking with nothing to back it I would be the first to brush him off, but the fact that he has documentation complicates things a little.

Is he trying to shop for a deal, well that's a Perry Mason moment! Of course he is, who wouldn't in his position. Trump denied knowing him and that set him off, not wanting to be the fall guy he swung back. This is what thugs and goons do to one another, it's a given.
 

Twin_Moose

Hall of Fame Member
Apr 17, 2017
22,041
6,160
113
Twin Moose Creek
I saw what the PG of Ukraine said about Parnas, but wonder of the sincerity of what he said (government officials have been known to lie you know.) If Parnas was a known liar, which he may well be, I am not defending him, why would they give face time to such a man? He also didn't deny meeting Parnas, rather said that they did meet but it was about nothing of importance. Again, why then meet with him? And it would make sense to me that the leaders of a country which is desperately in need of military support and funding from the USA, which Trump (the guy who withheld aide and is rumored to have threatened to suspend all aide)is still President of, would refrain from admitting to anything that could implicate Trump for fear of reprisals down the road.
When you say Nunes, is this the same Nunes who at first distanced himself from Parnas, saying that he didn't recall ever having spoken to him, who did a quick about face once it was made known that Parnas was to give an interview to Rachel Maddow? That Nunes? The same Nunes who sued a fake Twitter cow? The same Nunes who has sued, well, just about everyone?
https://www.sacbee.com/opinion/article237841409.html

Yep the same one that is suing CNN about the faked meeting in Vienna
 

Twin_Moose

Hall of Fame Member
Apr 17, 2017
22,041
6,160
113
Twin Moose Creek
Yeah, lets see. Lets see what more he has in his phone records etc. Like I already stated, if he were just talking with nothing to back it I would be the first to brush him off, but the fact that he has documentation complicates things a little.
Is he trying to shop for a deal, well that's a Perry Mason moment! Of course he is, who wouldn't in his position. Trump denied knowing him and that set him off, not wanting to be the fall guy he swung back. This is what thugs and goons do to one another, it's a given.

Yep the House should take it up and see if there is any there, there, his info has been proven false on multiple occasions. Btw what new info is he bringing forward that has not been introduced already?