Three Pieces of Evidence That Prove Evolution is a Fact

Blackleaf

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 9, 2004
49,956
1,910
113
He came from a very clever family did Mr Darwin. His great-grandfather, Josiah Wedgwood, gave us Wedgwood pottery and his grandfather Thomas Wedgwood helped invent photography.
 

Danbones

Hall of Fame Member
Sep 23, 2015
24,505
2,198
113
Charles Darwin was stupid.


Stu, Stu Pid...from the royal society of Science.
Please to meet you, can you guess my name...?

(I am travelling under a mistaken identity, shhhhh...don't tell anyone
I believe in the recreationism...say, is that a nice chair and a cold beer?)

You can tell why I had to write under a name de plume I guess?
 
Last edited:

Dexter Sinister

Unspecified Specialist
Oct 1, 2004
10,168
539
113
Regina, SK
I am a scientist by virtue of strict adherance to the method
Adhering to the method doesn't make you a scientist. That's like claiming adherence to the rituals of Catholicism makes you a priest. But your claim is false anyway, you don't adhere to the method and have at best only the most rudimentary understanding of it. Otherwise you'd know that Velikovsky made no useful contributions to science, the sun is powered by nuclear fusion, and the earth is not expanding.
 

Danbones

Hall of Fame Member
Sep 23, 2015
24,505
2,198
113
Actually he put catastrophism on the map, so you are incorrect.
I'm guessing you never read any of his work, which if true, would not make you an expert.
:)
 

darkbeaver

the universe is electric
Jan 26, 2006
41,035
201
63
RR1 Distopia 666 Discordia
Adhering to the method doesn't make you a scientist. That's like claiming adherence to the rituals of Catholicism makes you a priest. But your claim is false anyway, you don't adhere to the method and have at best only the most rudimentary understanding of it. Otherwise you'd know that Velikovsky made no useful contributions to science, the sun is powered by nuclear fusion, and the earth is not expanding.

Excuse me, but adherance to the method is the only deciding criteria in the case of who is or who is not a scientist. Or will you insist that a man with a spade excavating in a trench is certainly not a ditch/grave digger?
Every contribution made by Velikovsky to science was indeed very usefull. It is quite obvious to us science types that you are an employee of some organization of the counter revolutionary
movement bent on suppression of free scientific disclosure amongst the general public.


Actually he put catastrophism on the map, so you are incorrect.
I'm guessing you never read any of his work, which if true, would not make you an expert.
:)

D Sinister is a mixed up kid but not stupid. He's simply been brainwashed by obvious science pretenders like Hawkings the disfunctional corpse who has very likely not had any firing braincells for decades.

6:59
Magnetic Storm, Quake Alert, Food Watch | S0 News

Magnetic Storm, Quake Alert, Food Watch | S0 News
 

MHz

Time Out
Mar 16, 2007
41,030
43
48
Red Deer AB
and the earth is not expanding.
Really?? If the Oceanic crust timeline was overlaid there is a 200M year gap between the west Coast of North America and the East Coast of China. I define that as expansion. The Hawaiian Islands are over a hot-spot and the chain of islands that curves towards Alaska is a history of the hot-spot that is a stationary up-welling of magma that is coming up from the core as that is the hottest part of the planet. Let's add some new elements into it. Yellowstone is also over a hot-spot and assuming that up-welling is also stationary it's history leads back to the Great Lakes so perhaps their creation is due to an area that was over a hot-spot had the magma chambers come under a vacuum due to the area being above an area where the same amount of magma is heading back to the core collapses the empty void and the Great Lakes were landscaped into the form they have today. The vid about that area would be worth watching as the St Lawrence is a stretch mark, just like all the fracture zones in the Pacific Ocean basin.
Another aspect is water levels. 10,000BC - ???? the ocean levels were 400 ft lower than they are today but go farther back in time and Alberta was a shallow sea and that leaves the question of where the water went. Simple answer, as the oceanic rifts all expanded at the same time that left a void for the water to recede off the highest parts of the land. 200M years of spreading is showing and if the process was going on even longer there is your subduction zone. England split off from the EU and in being dragged out to sea and it will eventually be dragged do the bottom of the sea due to the Icelandic Rift expanding material towards the EU. The Pacific Rift off the coast of BC as once at the BC/AB border and BC is a result of material piling up rather than being pulled under. It is still expansion. Any advancement in knowledge comes from debate rather than from lectures where no questions are allowed. Hudson Bay and the GOM would be formed the same way as the Great Lakes.



[youtube]cAzSHP7ETPQ[/youtube]
The Permian Extinction | Mammal-Like Reptiles

Try insects that are part of an eco system. There should also be warm blooded flying things around at that time also as they are the top of the food change these days.
 

darkbeaver

the universe is electric
Jan 26, 2006
41,035
201
63
RR1 Distopia 666 Discordia
At this time the earth is expanding as opposed to some other time when it wound be shrinking mass wise. How the hell does Sinister think orbital stability might otherwise be maintained? What does charge weigh?

MHZ, you are going to be punished for screwing up this thread. Wheel the rack out Igor Locutus would you like a good fellow. My goodness your back lump is looking very ugly today, are you body building again?
 

MHz

Time Out
Mar 16, 2007
41,030
43
48
Red Deer AB
I knew you would finally get me back for that green ink thing where I turned ya in.

With the dia at 50% of what it is today what would a T-Rex weigh then the spinning ballerina effect is properly applied? Inquiring minds want to know

BTW I don't have my back to you and you look especially attractive today.
 

Blackleaf

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 9, 2004
49,956
1,910
113
I thought what is now the EU only dates back to the 1950s. I didn't know it was around millions of years ago.