It's not the fact that you object to nude photos that I find objectionable, it's the characterization of someone willing to pose nude as being willing to do anything else for money. No way. Some maybe, but no, for some, many, women, that is their limit. That's as exhibitionist as they're willing to get, because it fits into their morality. A body's a body. There's nothing wrong with nudity. That fits into my moral scheme. To imply that a woman is willing to do other things for money based on the fact that they'd pose nude is more immoral in my view than the pics themselves.
Hmmm, I guess some do and some don't, whichever it is, i disagree with the decision,As for the fact that they 'don't consider' their family... how would you possibly know? My cousin made sure the whole family knew when she was going to be doing a nude shoot, so no one would accidentally buy a magazine with her in it. And if they did, ew, the creepy factor's on them.
Do those porn stars, all pumped up with 'stuff', actually attract 'men'? If they do,
something is wrong with the men as well, as there really can't be anything sexually
arousing about those bodies at all, or do men really expect real women to look like
that, I wonder.
How in hell did we get to "porn stars"? And how did we get to "pumped up with stuff"? Talloola, you are imagining things again.
I applaud the hijacking efforts in this thread. This was a derailment of decent proportions. I'd say the thread train is laying on its side by the tracks now...![]()
How in hell did we get to "porn stars"? And how did we get to "pumped up with stuff"? Talloola, you are imagining things again.
There are two thoughts I have for 'women' or 'men' who take their clothes off and pose
for pictures.
1) They will do 'anything' for money, and probably doesn't stop at 'just' picture
taking.
2) They have no pride in themselves, and don't give one thought to their families
who can open a book one day and see their own relative looking back at them
'completely', how embarrassing for all, except the sleeze ball who posed.
My husband was looking at a 'magazine' some years ago at work, as most of the
guys do, and was very shocked to see a 'relative' of ours looking back at him,
completely naked. When he told me about it, we both felt uncomfortable,
and promised we would never reveal that information to anyone in the family,
as I'm sure her parents new 'nothing' about it.
I suppose most would think we are 'just' old fashioned, but I'm happy to be,
thanks. I remember saying that about our parents, over other things that
were more innocent than that, so, I wonder what we will think is 'OK'
100 years from now.
and who should be more ashamed... your relative (presumably grand-daughter or neice or someone of similar age) or you husband, who was reading a magazine which contained naked pictures of women of a similar (exactly the same) age as his grand-daughter/neice/state-relation-here?