Logic 7 said:That is a very crappy "Photoshop" work,either the guy who did it, was drunk, or he just doesnt know how use photoshop.
They aren't photoshopped. They were indeed radicals protesting in London.
But my arguement still stands. One thing I will take back however (now knowing more about the photos) is that the person I commented on ‘would of had a more in-depth explanation with probably a different statement in mind’. No, I doubt his opinion would have changed. Some of those people need to get back to the basics of their humanity.
Yes, the radicals do exist. Taliban brutality is a fact. Again the question however is why they hate us. The extreme backlash against the west really isn’t because of what we are doing in our own countries. They might ‘dislike us’ on the basis of differing values, but to the extent of ‘hatred’ - I don’t think so.
The west has blown their societies in the Middle East to bits. Destroyed towns, cities. Allowed the occupations of their lands. Blown their people to bits. Support brutal regimes and try to control their resources.
Their telivisions show what we don’t see. Children with their heads leaking out onto the roads.
They hate us because of our policies not our freedoms. Better yet, our actions. This is not a perfect statement but since we are making generalizations here, this is it.
http://www.snopes.com/photos/politics/muslimprotest.asp
Other Muslims maintained that the protesters were extremists not representative of mainstream British Muslims:
Asghar Bukhari, chairman of the Muslim Public Affairs Committee, said the demonstration in London should have been stopped by police because the group had been advocating violence.
He said the protesters "did not represent British Muslims".
Mr Bukhari told the BBC News website: "The placards and chants were disgraceful and disgusting, Muslims do not feel that way.
"I condemn them without reservation, these people are less representative of Muslims than the BNP are of the British people."
He said that Muslims were angry over satirical cartoons of the Prophet Muhammad published in European papers but it was "outrageous" for anyone to advocate extreme action or violence.
"We believe it [the protest] should have been banned and the march stopped.
"It's irrelevant whether it's Muslims causing hatred or anyone else — freedom of speech has to be responsible."
Getting a little tired right now. Was barely able to think this post through.
Goodnight.