Good video. And I fully agree with the principle of one nation one vote and the majority vote carries the day within the context of international law, which means international law itself will need to be changed to make one nation one vote a reality.
What does Canada do in the meantime? One solution I could possibly see would be for Canada to withdraw from all international organizations and keep to itself while still promoting free trade and free movement as much as possible.
Another symbolic move could be to include the Universal Declaration of Human Rights in Canadian Passports, as is proposed here for the US passport:
Human Rights Action Center | About
Though such a move would be mainly symbolic, we can't deny that:
1. It would be embarrassing for Canada to include the UDHR into our passports while the Canadian government itself disrespects the articles of that deceleration, and
2. It would also send the message that Canada expects other countries to respect the rights of Canadian citizens abroad as per the UDHR.
Beyond that though, Canada would essentially take a non-interventionist policy beyond its borders as long as carriers of this new Canadian passport have their rights respected as per the UDHR.
Or possibly we could go one step further by creating a new world body to which states could join only by agreeing to certain points, including:
1. Include the UDHR into their passports,
2. Uphold the UDHR within their respective countries, and
3. Have this new organization double as an alliance of all member states.
We should bear in mind though that Canada' own constitution would likely have to be modified for this to happen. Namely, the clauses of the British North America Act which discriminate in favour of Catholics and sometimes Protestants in the separate school system, a Bill of Rights 1689 which restricts the monarch's freedom of religion as per the UDHR without discriminatory consequence, the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms and the Official Languages Act which discriminates in favour of certain linguistic communities over others including the First Nations, and parts of Quebec's Bill 101.
After all, if Canada is going to take the moral high ground, we have to start at home so as not to become the world's laughing stock.
After all, as long as Canada's laws and constitution violate the principles of the UDHR, how can we then set ourselves up as an example to others.
A good example is Guantanamo. Since then, all US criticism of human rights abroad has been without effect. And until that's rectified, the US will have no moral voice in the world. Unfortunately, Canada is no exception with our disrespect for treaties entered into in good faith, discriminatory laws, etc.
Another possible solution I could see woudl be to require Canada's ambassador to the current UN to promote the UDHR, and give him free reign to vote on UN resolutions in conformity with the UDHR, even against his own country if needs be.
