The Climate Summit in Copenhagen Must Be Cancelled!

china

Time Out
Jul 30, 2006
5,247
37
48
73
Ottawa ,Canada
The Climate Summit in Copenhagen Must Be Cancelled!

November 29th, 2009 5:13 AM

by Helga Zepp-LaRouche

Cancel the Copenhagen Climate Summit! This statement was released by the Civil Rights Solidarity Movement (BüSo), a German political party, on Nov. 27, and has been translated from German.
The Climate Summit in Copenhagen, which is to take place from Dec. 6 to 18, and in which 193 nations, approximately 65 heads of government, and up to 20,000 delegates are to participate, is based on a gigantic fraud, and must immediately be cancelledâ€"and not only to save the substantial expenses for this neo-malthusian propaganda event, whose real aim consists in establishing a de facto world government.
After almost 1,000 scientists have recently distanced themselves from the thesis of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) concerning allegedly anthropogenic global warming, now the scandalous manipulations that hackers have unearthed in the e-mail communications of "scientists" of the Climate Research Unit (CRU) of East Anglia University in Great Britain, are the final proof of the climate fraudâ€"in case anyone still needed it.
In reality, the raw, unalterated data from long-term weather stations show little or no change during the last 150 years. Half of the stations show a slight cooling, and global cooling has been occurring for around ten years. So what is behind this enormously expensive campaign?
The answer is clear: Apart from all sorts of profiteers, who see the C02 emissions trade as a new opportunity for ripping off the population, it is essentially the policy of the British Empire, or, more precisely, of Prince Philip, who has repeatedly said publicly that he wants to be reincarnated as a virus, so as to more effectively contribute to population reduction. On Nov. 12, the CEO of Prince Philip's World Wide Fund for Nature (WWF) told reporters: "We believe it fundamental for the President to go to Copenhagen, to look other leaders in the eye, convey our commitment as a country, and secure theirs." And promptly Obama announced, contrary to earlier statements, that he would be in Copenhagen on Dec. 9.
Moreover, it is monstrous that an official UN organization, the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change, and the Danish government, want to place the question of population reduction officially on the agenda.
According to the Danish newspaper Berlinske Tidende, Danish Development Minister Ulla Toerness has admitted the controversial character of this proposal, which in several nations is still considered a huge taboo. But since, she says, there's a connection between population growth and climate change, this proposal also has the complete support of the Danish Prime Minister.
The British organization Optimum Population Trust (OPT), which crusades for global population reduction, asserts in a study that one of the best opportunities for combatting so-called "global warming," consists in preventing births, because preventing the birth of new "polluters" would be a far cheaper means to prevent "climate catastrophe," than acquiring renewable energy sources. According to the study, by spending £200 trillion, we could prevent a half-billion births and thus the emission of 24 billion tons of CO2, over the next 40 years.
Also revealing, is the fact that according to Forbes magazine, the "14 richest men in the world" (who owe their wealth not least to the casino economy) met back on May 5 of this year at the home of the president of the private Rockefeller University. Bill Gates, Warren Buffett, Michael Bloomberg, George Soros, Peter Petersen, David Rockefeller, Jr., and the other participants in this illustrious gathering agreed that the problem of population growth poses the worst environmental, social, and industrial threat.
Another in a whole series of conferences, which served to prepare for the Copenhagen summit, was the conference of the Policy Network think-tank on June 5 at the London School of Economics, at which Tony Blair, whose authorship of the Iraq War is right now under investigation in Great Britain, delivered the keynote speech, emphasizing that a "revolutionary change in behavior" is required. To this end, the United States alone would have to reduce its emissions to one-tenth of the current level! Blair left no doubt that he sees the greatest problem in the fact that China wants to implement "the greatest industrialization that the world has ever seen."
During a three-day conference in Essen on the theme "The Great Transformation," organized by the Mercator Foundation in collaboration with the Climate Institute in Potsdam and Wuppertal, a prospectus for its Working Group 4 stated: "Could open democratic societies keep up with the impact of serious changes in the global climate, or could authoritarian regimes be better suited to enforce the measures required?" One of the participants in this conference was the head of the Climate Institute in Potsam, Hans-Joachim Schellenhuber, a recent host of Prince Charles for an "Experts' Discussion on the Environment and Climate Themes" at the Postdam institute, and who has also been awarded the highest English order, the Order of the Garter.
One can only agree with Lord Christopher Monckton in his characterization of the climate fraud and the Copenhagen conference: It is the attempt to establish an unelected world government with enormous and unprecedented powers. A small, closely linked grouping of so-called scientists is now exposed as frauds and criminals. Another grouping under the leadership of former British Finance Minister Lord Nigel Lawson, along with a substantial group of other Lords, authors, and journalists, has just now established a new website, and a Global Warming Policy Foundation (GWPF), which has dedicated itself to the fight against this fraud.
Unfortunately, there can be no doubt that there is a consensus in the pro-British part of the international establishment, to respond to the systemic crisis of the global financial system with a new fascism, in which the poor, the weak, and the sick are to be sacrificed for the benefit of speculative interests.
To aim for such a policy falls under the Nuremberg Laws after World War II. All who want to participate in the Copenhagen conference should remember that. After all that has come to light until now about the climate fraud, there is only one reasonable solution: Cancel the conference immediately.
-###-​

By Helga Zepp-LaRouche, in association with the Political Action Committee (LPAC). www.larouchepac.com
 

Dexter Sinister

Unspecified Specialist
Oct 1, 2004
10,168
536
113
Regina, SK
...whose real aim consists in establishing a de facto world government.
Even if that were true, which I strongly doubt, what would necessarily be so wormy about a world government? Given all the death and destruction that's resulted from competing independent nation states fighting over minor religious differences and useless bits of territory, that doesn't seem like a bad idea in principle.
 

MHz

Time Out
Mar 16, 2007
41,030
43
48
Red Deer AB
Weren't there a few global warming conferences/seminars canceled due to winter weather (obviously last winter)? That isn't taken as a 'sign' but some leaked e-mails are. lol
This doesn't mean there is an end to the 'climate warming cash-cow', now it will just be 'climate change'. Nothing can be done on our end except to predict what will actually happen depending on which direction it takes.
 

china

Time Out
Jul 30, 2006
5,247
37
48
73
Ottawa ,Canada
ClimateGate - A Comprehensive Archive
Core reading on one of the greatest scandals in modern history. How prominent scientists skewed the data on global warming
Steve Watson, Paul Watson
Infowars.net
Friday, Nov 27, 2009





On Thursday 19th November 2009, news began to circulate that hacked documents and communications from the University of East Anglia’s Hadley Climate Research Unit (aka CRU) had been published to the internet.
The information revealed how top scientists conspired to falsify data in the face of declining global temperatures in order to prop up the premise that man-made factors are driving climate change.
The documents and emails illustrated how prominent climatologists, affiliated with the UN's International Panel on Climate Change, embarked on a venomous and coordinated campaign to ostracize climate skeptics and use their influence to keep dissenting reports from appearing in peer-reviewed journals, as well as using cronyism to avoid compliance with Freedom of Information Act requests.
Here follows a compendium of articles and videos on what was quickly dubbed as "ClimateGate".

The Backstory:
CLIMATE BOMBSHELL: Hacker leaks thousands of emails showing conspiracy to “hide” the real data on manmade climate change
Climategate: the final nail in the coffin of ‘Anthropogenic Global Warming’?

Hiding the Decline:
Hacked E Mails: Climate Scientists Discuss “Hiding Decline” In Temperatures
Mike’s Nature Trick
McIntyre: The deleted data from the “Hide the Decline” trick
Hide The Decline – Climategate
Bishop Hill’s compendium of CRU email issues

The Codified Smoking Gun:
Forget The Emails, Code Discusses “Artificially Adjusted” Temperatures
Climategate: hide the decline – codified
CRU Emails “may” be open to interpretation, but commented code by the programmer tells the real story

Hijacking The Peer Review System:
"Climategate": Peer-Review System Was Hijacked By Warming Alarmists
Climate Expert: "Compromised" UN Scientists should be excluded from IPCC, Peer-Review Process
UK Scientist: ‘Case for climate fears is blown to smithereens…whole theory should be destroyed and discarded and UN conference should be closed’
British climate change scientists ‘conspired to keep skeptics in the dark’

Calls For Investigations:
Call For Independent Inquiry Into Climategate as Global Warming Fraud Implodes
Global Warming On Trial: Inhofe Calls For Investigation Of UN IPCC
US Congress investigates Climategate e-mails: this could be the beginning of the end for AGW
Congress may probe leaked global warming e-mails
Government petition started in UK regarding CRU Climategate

Calls For Criminal Prosecutions:
Another Prominent Scientist Calls CRU Scientists “Criminals”
ClimateGate: People need to go to jail
Lord Monckton: Prosecute the Climate Change Criminals
Author Points To “Climategate’s Perry Mason Moment”
Denying Email Deletion

Skeptics Vindicated:
Climate Alarmists Finally Admit The Debate Is Not Over
The New ‘Deniers’
TV Environmentalist Goes Nuts Over ClimateGate
Global Warming Meltdown: Climategate!

U.S Fallout:
Climategate e-mails sweep America, may scuttle Barack Obama’s Cap and Trade laws

Australian Fallout:
Ripples of Climategate? Liberal MP’s desert Turnbull in Australia over emissions trading scheme
Climategate: five Aussie MPs lead the way by resigning in disgust over carbon tax

New Zealand Fallout:
New Zealand Climate Data Shows Clear Evidence Of Fraud
Climategate: the scandal spreads, the plot thickens, the shame deepens…

Woeful Mainstream Media Coverage:
BBC Climate Correspondent Was Forwarded CRU Emails Five Weeks Before They Were Made Public
Climategate: how the MSM reported the greatest scandal in modern science
Climategate: Monbiot makes it all suddenly OK through medium of satire
Climategate: BBC website still thinks it’s a story about computer hacking
Climategate: How Faine censored the skeptical news
CNN Sucks: Climategate Never Happened
CNN Finally Does Their Propaganda Piece On Climate Gate
NYT Tackles Damning Global Warming Emails, But Reveals Own Hypocrisy
NY Times reporter whitewashes Climategate story he is part of

Alex Jones Coverage of ClimateGate:
Emergency Viral: ClimateGate Fraud Exposes Dirty Tricks Agenda For Global Government
Alex Jones on Climategate: Hoax of all time a global Ponzi scheme
Alex Jones Tv:How to Expose The Climate Fraud!!
Alex Jones TV: Hacked Emails Show Blatant Climate Change Fraud
Dr. Tim Ball on Alex Jones Tv 1/5: Myth on Global Warming & The CRU Hacked Documents
Marc Morano on Alex Jones Tv 1/2:The Case For Al Gore's Climate Change is Falling Apart
Alex Jones Tv: Climate-Gate " THE E-MAILS ARE REAL
 

sputnik

New Member
Dec 8, 2009
14
0
1
Canada
Yeah this summit seems to be a total sham. 47 delegates from Canada alone... Why would we need to fly 47 people there? What a waste. Why so many people for one country? I could understand something like 10, but it seems all too extravagant. Sounds like a free vacation to me!
 

Walter

Hall of Fame Member
Jan 28, 2007
34,863
108
63
December 09, 2009
Palin urges Obama to forgo Copenhagen visit

Ethel C. Fenig

[FONT=times new roman,times]While religious climate elitists gather in Copenhagen worrying about "global warming" as they contribute to it by jetting in on their multiple carbon spewing planes and whisked around the city and the European continent on their numerous carbon spewing limousines, former Alaska governor Sarah Palin (R) calmly sets forth the facts in an editorial in today's Washington Post . [/FONT]

[FONT=times new roman,times]Global warming theorists aren't advocating climate science she notes, they're advocating political science. [/FONT]

[FONT=times new roman,times]The revelation of appalling actions by so-called climate change experts allows the American public to finally understand the concerns so many of us have articulated on this issue.[/FONT]

[FONT=times new roman,times]"Climate-gate," as the e-mails and other documents from the Climate Research Unit at the University of East Anglia have become known, exposes a highly politicized scientific circle -- the same circle whose work underlies efforts at the Copenhagen climate change conference. The agenda-driven policies being pushed in Copenhagen won't change the weather, but they would change our economy for the worse. [/FONT]
[FONT=times new roman,times]In contrast, Palin states[/FONT]

[FONT=times new roman,times]I've always believed that policy should be based on sound science, not politics. As governor of Alaska, I took a stand against politicized science when I sued the federal government over its decision to list the polar bear as an endangered species despite the fact that the polar bear population had more than doubled. [/FONT]
[FONT=times new roman,times]Therefore, she continues[/FONT]

[FONT=times new roman,times]But while we recognize the occurrence of these natural, cyclical environmental trends, we can't say with assurance that man's activities cause weather changes. [/FONT]
[FONT=times new roman,times]And so the woman with real government experience offers some advice to her former community organizing opponent. [/FONT]

[FONT=times new roman,times]Without trustworthy science and with so much at stake, Americans should be wary about what comes out of this politicized conference. The president should boycott Copenhagen.[/FONT]
 

Tonington

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 27, 2006
15,441
150
63
Facts and Sarah Palin do not belong in the same sentence. She repeats falsehoods even after the fact-checkers show them to be false.

She apparently thinks that the CRU is the operation advising Obama...she's as loony as they come.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ron in Regina

TenPenny

Hall of Fame Member
Jun 9, 2004
17,467
139
63
Location, Location
The answer is clear: Apart from all sorts of profiteers, who see the C02 emissions trade as a new opportunity for ripping off the population, it is essentially the policy of the British Empire, or, more precisely, of Prince Philip, who has repeatedly said publicly that he wants to be reincarnated as a virus, so as to more effectively contribute to population reduction.

You know someone's fallen off the deep end of sanity when they bring in old PP.
 

TenPenny

Hall of Fame Member
Jun 9, 2004
17,467
139
63
Location, Location
I like the way Palin basically said that she's not very bright, but she thinks that's what the voters want, not these 'elitist' smart people.
 

EagleSmack

Hall of Fame Member
Feb 16, 2005
44,168
96
48
USA
And the delegates from real underdeveloped countries (except China and India) are making no bones about why they are there...money. On NPR they are demanding trillions of dollars from developed nations. They want economy crushing emission restrictions so developed countries will have to pay trillions in carbon credits to them.
 

SirJosephPorter

Time Out
Nov 7, 2008
11,956
56
48
Ontario
I see the conspiracy theorists are out in full force here. They see a vast, worldwide conspiracy, whereby tens of thousands of scientists came together and cooked up the global warming hoax.

Bush was at least a bit more sensible, according to him, it was an Al Qaeda plot designed to ruin USA’s economy, or at least that is the impression he gave.

Anyway, do the global warming deniers tell us who orchestrated this worldwide conspiracy, who managed to bring tens of thousands of scientists together, and persuade them to lie about global warming? Such a person surely deserves a Nobel Prize of some kind (if Obama can win the Peace Prize, why not the person who can bring so many scientists together and cook up the vast, gigantic worldwide conspiracy)?

Interestingly these are the same folk who laugh at 9/11 conspiracy theorists. 9/11 conspiracy theorists lack imagination, their imagination is nothing compared to that of global warming deniers.
 

SirJosephPorter

Time Out
Nov 7, 2008
11,956
56
48
Ontario
I remember reading somewhere that the so called ‘climategate’ affair was instigated by Russians, they don’t want the Copenhagen meting to succeed, so they got a few hackers to hack into the E mails.

And really, many of those who claim that global warming is a worldwide conspiracy, are really vested interests of one kind or another, representing big business (which don’t want to spend the money to reduce GHGs), or religious right (their religion tells them to subdue, to dominate the earth, not preserve or conserve them), or extreme right wing nuts, such as tea baggers etc.
 

lone wolf

Grossly Underrated
Nov 25, 2006
32,493
210
63
In the bush near Sudbury
I remember reading somewhere that the so called ‘climategate’ affair was instigated by Russians, they don’t want the Copenhagen meting to succeed, so they got a few hackers to hack into the E mails.

And really, many of those who claim that global warming is a worldwide conspiracy, are really vested interests of one kind or another, representing big business (which don’t want to spend the money to reduce GHGs), or religious right (their religion tells them to subdue, to dominate the earth, not preserve or conserve them), or extreme right wing nuts, such as tea baggers etc.

Okay Flibbertyjibbets, what sort of link can you provide about Russian hackers? More of your version of reality ... or is it "as seen on TV"