The casual arming of the idiot cousins in the country directly south of Canada.

CDNBear

Custom Troll
Sep 24, 2006
43,839
207
63
Ontario
Like I should care??
You're the one that made an issue out of it.

Nope, no problem with dad, the only problems I have is with the puffed up male egos in here that equate guns with their penises.
Can you point that out? Or is this just more of your imagination at play?

Wrong again. He sure didn't need to compensate as many on this forum seem to need to.
That's not what you said though. You said...

Ah, I now understand the male fascination with guns!! It is seen as an extension of the penis by those ruled by the little head. Should have known.
That sums up your dad given his complete lack of intelligence.

We ate what he hunted, and it wasn't considered a "sport"
Ya, so? Do you think he's special?

LOL, you cannot conceive of someone secure enough in himself, not to get twisted out of shape over guns, can you??
No, that's you that keeps saying that.

Nope, until I posted here, I never came across such insecure human males.
Can you back that up? When I say until you posted here, I never read such utter stupidity, and I can back it up.

Never had a doubt about dad but a few of the posters here......... whew.....
Of course you never doubted your dad, you're obviously as stupid as he was.

They tend to gather in packs and attack, and the target is generally a woman.
You could be a a pimple face boy from Naniamo for all we know. Given you list of lies and half truths, that's likely the case.

Now that is funny......coming from the "Great ?white,?black Hunter"
What's funny? My joke, in which you and your posts are the punchline?

Ya, that is funny.

And I'm not black, nor white. But i have to ask, why does my ethnicity matter?
 

bluebyrd35

Council Member
Aug 9, 2008
2,373
0
36
Ormstown.Chat.Valley
Sometimes bad humans need to be hunted. And animals are food.

So do you still think guns are a penis extension?

Probably got a look at you and your grey hair.

................
In the eyes of the great hunters here.....Oh yes....very much so.
.............

My hair is dark brown. Great genes from both parents ;-)

Anyway, I am away again for awhile, Europe this time so you will have to find another woman or moderately intelligent male to abuse.
 

CDNBear

Custom Troll
Sep 24, 2006
43,839
207
63
Ontario
................
In the eyes of the great hunters here.....Oh yes....very much so.
What's in our eyes?

My hair is dark brown. Great genes from both parents ;-)
I would consider being a s stupid as your father a great genetic trait.
Anyway, I am away again for awhile, Europe this time so you will have to find another woman or moderately intelligent male to abuse.
Ahhh, I guess only you are allowed to be rude and use abusing commentary. Typical hypocrite.
 

bluebyrd35

Council Member
Aug 9, 2008
2,373
0
36
Ormstown.Chat.Valley
You're the one that made an issue out of it.

Can you point that out? Or is this just more of your imagination at play?

That's not what you said though. You said...

That sums up your dad given his complete lack of intelligence.

Ya, so? Do you think he's special?

No, that's you that keeps saying that.

Can you back that up? When I say until you posted here, I never read such utter stupidity, and I can back it up.

Of course you never doubted your dad, you're obviously as stupid as he was.

You could be a a pimple face boy from Naniamo for all we know. Given you list of lies and half truths, that's likely the case.

What's funny? My joke, in which you and your posts are the punchline?

Ya, that is funny.

And I'm not black, nor white. But i have to ask, why does my ethnicity matter?
...................

Doesn't matter a **** to me, just trying to be politically correct. The term is "Great White Hunter"

You wouldn't last more than a minute in a formal debate. You argue like a teenage girl. You use insults, lies, half truths, misquotes instead of a reasonable argument. Oddly enough it is you, a man who will go back to something said six pages ago, to avoid actually dealing with the present subject, especially if he cannot adequately come up with a decent answer.

Generally speaking men accuse women of doing this in an argument, but here it is the men who resort to such tactics. If you think it goes unnoticed, it doesn't.
 

CDNBear

Custom Troll
Sep 24, 2006
43,839
207
63
Ontario
Doesn't matter a **** to me, just trying to be politically correct.
Apparently it does, since you brought it up.

The term is "Great White Hunter" .
As I said, I'm not white, nor am I black. More importantly, I didn't make any claims about my hunting prowess. Which makes your comment another fallacy, based on your imagination.

You wouldn't last more than a minute in a formal debate.
You haven't presented one, so how would you know?

You argue like a teenage girl.
Ya, you've said that before, after I tore apart your silly conspiracy crap.

You use insults, lies, half truths, misquotes instead of a reasonable argument.
I tried reasonable argument with you. You called into question my intelligence when I summarily destroyed your silly links. With of all things, your own links.

You seem to equate intelligence, or lack thereof with whether or not people believe the crap you fill your posts with.

Do you honestly think that's a reasoned argument?

Oddly enough it is you, a man who will go back to something said six pages ago, to avoid actually dealing with the present subject, especially if he cannot adequately come up with a decent answer.
I go back to stuff from 6 pages ago, to disprove the lies you tell in the present. Or prove a point.

It's called debating.

Generally speaking men accuse women of doing this in an argument, but here it is the men who resort to such tactics.
I would imagine anyone confronted with such fallacious lies would resort to going 6 pages back to prove their point.

It's actually part of debating. Using your opponents words against them. But like I said, you don't know what a debate is.

Gender is irrelevant, unless you can't formulate a reasoned response and want to change the subject, as you did here.

If you think it goes unnoticed, it doesn't.
What doesn't go unnoticed? How stupid your father was? How asinine your posts are? How easy it is to tear apart your silly posts? Ya, I guess all that doesn't.

If only you could raise the bar.
 
Last edited:

bluebyrd35

Council Member
Aug 9, 2008
2,373
0
36
Ormstown.Chat.Valley
Debate is a broader form of argument than logical argument, which only examines consistency from axiom, and factual argument, which only examines what is or isn't the case or rhetoric which is a technique of persuasion. Though logical consistency, factual accuracy and some degree of emotional appeal to the audience are important elements of the art of persuasion, in debating, one side often prevails over the other side by presenting a superior "context" and/or framework of the issue, which is far more subtle and strategic. (from wiki)

It has absolutely nothing to do with twisting the meaning of another's words then using the twisted version against them, nor is a debate about using personal insults to make points. It is supposed to be about presenting the best side of an argument without resorting to lies, innuendos, insults or casting aspersions on another's intelligence.

The type exchange done here is how kids argue and is rather pathetic. I have better ways to use my time than dealing with this sort of idiocy.
 

CDNBear

Custom Troll
Sep 24, 2006
43,839
207
63
Ontario
Debate is a broader form of argument than logical argument, which only examines consistency from axiom, and factual argument, which only examines what is or isn't the case or rhetoric which is a technique of persuasion.
Correct.

Shall I go back and show where you failed present a logical argument?

Or will that only result in me being called a teen aged girl again?

Though logical consistency, factual accuracy and some degree of emotional appeal to the audience are important elements of the art of persuasion, in debating, one side often prevails over the other side by presenting a superior "context" and/or framework of the issue, which is far more subtle and strategic. (from wiki)
Well using your own links to tear apart your other links, sure does put your logical consistency is question.

Perhaps if you placed more importance on logic and fact, and less on emotion and imagination, you wouldn't have to resort to insults.

It has absolutely nothing to do with twisting the meaning of another's words then using the twisted version against them, nor is a debate about using personal insults to make points.
I never twisted your words, or the words in your links. That was just your excuse so you could go on believing something I showed to be logically inconsistent, and in some cases outright lies.

You got insulted when you carried on making silly claims of me twisting your words, then you calling into question, my intelligence.

It is supposed to be about presenting the best side of an argument without resorting to lies, innuendos, insults or casting aspersions on another's intelligence.
I agree. So why did you resort to all of that then?

The type exchange done here is how kids argue and is rather pathetic.
I agree, but I never shy away from lowering myself to my opponents level, as I did with you.

I have better ways to use my time than dealing with this sort of idiocy.
But I like dealing with your idiocy. Please don't go!!!
 

CDNBear

Custom Troll
Sep 24, 2006
43,839
207
63
Ontario
And your point regarding the topic is??
There wasn't one. I was addressing your post. But I would imagine you'd want to change the subject again, since you got your ass handed to you, yet again.

I am sorry but it seems I missed all the references to the casual arming our US neighbours in your post.
Ya, I missed those in your posts as well. I must have missed the multitudes of on topic commentary mixed in, between your infatuation with my penis and ethnicity. It must have been overshadowed by the story of your fathers monumental stupidity.

But at least we are again given a shining example of your hypocrisy.

If I were you, I'd go to wikiality and look up fallacies, and then reread the section on debate.

You still have no idea what it is.
 
Last edited:

EagleSmack

Hall of Fame Member
Feb 16, 2005
44,168
96
48
USA
Much prefer a man with a flesh penis and of course in as skimpy a pair of underwear as the lady above is wearing. Metal ones are a turn off.

Metal underwear?




I was a quick, smart, inquisitive city kid,

Yet you pointed a gun at your mom?

You wouldn't last more than a minute in a formal debate. You argue like a teenage girl. You use insults, lies, half truths, misquotes instead of a reasonable argument. Oddly enough it is you, a man who will go back to something said six pages ago, to avoid actually dealing with the present subject, especially if he cannot adequately come up with a decent answer.

Generally speaking men accuse women of doing this in an argument, but here it is the men who resort to such tactics. If you think it goes unnoticed, it doesn't.

Wow, you do have a problem with men don't you?
 

DaSleeper

Trolling Hypocrites
May 27, 2007
33,676
1,666
113
Northern Ontario,
There wasn't one. I was addressing your post. But I would imagine you'd want to change the subject again, since you got your ass handed to you, yet again.

Ya, I missed those in your posts as well. I must have missed the multitudes of on topic commentary mixed in, between your infatuation with my penis and ethnicity. It must have been overshadowed by the story of your fathers monumental stupidity.

But at least we are again given a shining example of your hypocrisy.

If I were you, I'd go to wikiality and look up fallacies, and then reread the section on debate.

You still have no idea what it is.

Now now Bear.....you be nice to a woman almost twice your age.....or next you will be accused of Old Lady Bashing" ;-)


OK .....I know....references to steel penises, and phallus whorship is not normal at her advanced age...