The Bizarre Case of "Admiral Mark Norman"

Curious Cdn

Hall of Fame Member
Feb 22, 2015
37,070
6
36
I have a feeling you are right, Dec.
I keep thinking of that old adage 'Be careful what you wish for'. I wished for this government to fail. I wished for the little potato to be shown for the shallow, arrogant, entitled person I felt he was since the incident in the HOC when strode arrogantly across the floor, grabbed MP Brown by the arm telling MPs to 'get the bleep out of the way and elbowing MP Ruth Brosseau in the chest as he shoved his through the other MPs on the floor. Then without so much as a backward glance, apology or pause continued on his way. I remember thinking then that this man was all show and no go. Talk about True Colors - they were on full display that day. He followed that little bit of drama up by again crossing the floor to engage in a verbal argument with Tom Mulcair.
That is the real Justin Trudeau. Anyone who would so blatantly break House protocol believes themselves to be above such petty little inconveniences and thus free to do as they see fit. They are sad, small and extremely narcissistic people. They do not make good leaders as the opinion of others really doesn't matter to them. They would never be ready to hold an office as important as that of the Prime Minister of Canada. He does not deserve the title of the Right Honorable for he is neither. With every day that goes by and this sordid tale continues, Justin Trudeau brings shame upon himself and in reflection, Canada.
If anyone needs to 'speak up' it is our Prime Minister.


Hey, look at this! The SNC Lavalin and Admiral Norman scandals criss-cross!

http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/snc-lavalin-contract-defence-bribery-1.5073996
 

Mowich

Hall of Fame Member
Dec 25, 2005
16,649
998
113
75
Eagle Creek
Defence lawyers receive heavily censored memo to Trudeau about Mark Norman's case

A 60-page memo about Vice-Admiral Mark Norman's breach of trust case — written by the country's top federal bureaucrat to Prime Minister Justin Trudeau — has been delivered to Norman's lawyers with its contents almost completely blacked out.

Norman's defence team isn't happy with the redaction and plans to fight it in court.

The Department of Justice claims the document is subject to solicitor-client privilege and cannot be completely disclosed.

Marie Henein, Norman's lead counsel, has alleged political interference in the prosecution of the former head of the navy. Norman is accused of leaking cabinet secrets related to a $668 million shipbuilding deal.

Memos blacked out

She has subpoenaed documents from the Privy Council Office and the Prime Minister's Office — including emails, texts and personal notes — to make that case.

A number of records have been disclosed as a result of the court order, but some have arrived in redacted form due to claims of solicitor-client privilege, including the memo from Clerk of the Privy Council Michael Wernick to Trudeau.

Both Judge Heather Perkins-McVey and Henein noted in court today that Wernick is not a lawyer. The clerk's degree is in economics.

Other large memos related to the case have been blacked out, including two written by the Privy Council's top lawyer, Paul Shuttle, to Wernick.

The disclosure of the clerk's briefing to the prime minister raised some eyebrows because, following previous searches, the Department of Justice reported to the defence that Wernick had no notes related to Norman's prosecution.

Two days have been set aside — April 16 and 17 — for the defence to make its case to see uncensored versions of the memos.

Norman is scheduled to go to trial in August, right around the time the federal election campaign gets underway.

The hunt for documents which could help defend Norman has been a slow process marked by missteps and confusion, and several sharp rebukes from the judge.

On Thursday, lawyers for two of the country's leading shipyards were in court to review the release of documents related to them.

The federal government has turned over hundreds of pages of internal records that both Irving Shipbuilding in Halifax and the Davie Shipyard, in Levis, Que., might consider commercially sensitive.

The documents might be pertinent to the defence and the judge asked the two companies to make sure they're comfortable with what the court will release to both the Crown and the defence.

Duplicate documents

The lawyer for Irving said the federal government had flagged nine documents for review, but the judge noted that she had seen at least 24 records that the company might also want to review.

Both shipyards left Thursday's hearing to examine the complete set of records.

The judge upbraided federal lawyers for sending her duplicate copies of the same documents — with some versions censored to purge cabinet secrets and others left untouched. "Certainly you were supposed to be reviewing for duplication, but I can tell you, you haven't been," said Perkins-McVey.

https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/mark-norman-wernick-trudeau-leaks-shipbuilding-1.5075250
 

spilledthebeer

Executive Branch Member
Jan 26, 2017
9,296
4
36
I don't seem to have a lot of support with the white natty climate change deniers.

Maybe if i put on a yellow vest and join in on one of the "immigration debates"


POOR HOID!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


He thinks that being a dedicated LIE-beral SHILL will make him popular!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


Somewhere...............................


Somehow....................................



Sorry Hoid........................you are just a nasty little LIE-beral toadie!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


You are dedicated to them so you are insulting ordinary people with Fake News......................................


but your status as LIE-beral TROLL is not good enough to get you noticed by the big wigs in the party|!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


You are like one of those low level Nazi goons scurrying like a cockroach looking for a hiding place after being abandoned by your leaders as WW2 wended!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
 

Mowich

Hall of Fame Member
Dec 25, 2005
16,649
998
113
75
Eagle Creek
Mark Norman defence team subpoenas Trudeau, Butts and other top advisers:



Thanks for this, Ron. Interesting comment by the young woman near the very end of the program who mentioned that while the Harper government scandal came near the end of his 2nd term in office, the trudeau liberals are facing two extremely serious allegations of government malfeasance in just 3 and 1/2 years.

Now we know what the liberals meant when they said they were going to do things differently. :lol:
 

Curious Cdn

Hall of Fame Member
Feb 22, 2015
37,070
6
36
Thanks for this, Ron. Interesting comment by the young woman near the very end of the program who mentioned that while the Harper government scandal came near the end of his 2nd term in office, the trudeau liberals are facing two extremely serious allegations of government malfeasance in just 3 and 1/2 years.
Now we know what the liberals meant when they said they were going to do things differently. :lol:
I'm sure that they're still putting wads of bills in paper bags in Quebec ridings. Old traditions ...
 

Twin_Moose

Hall of Fame Member
Apr 17, 2017
21,388
5,785
113
Twin Moose Creek
'We aren't going to turn the page': Conservatives try again to tie Norman trial to SNC-Lavalin fallout

Federal Conservatives made a pitch Friday — in the wake of the SNC Lavalin affair — to turn the criminal case against Vice-Admiral Mark Norman into the spinoff political scandal of the spring.

While the pace of the SNC-Lavalin scandal could start slowing down now, following the ejection of both former justice minister Jody Wilson-Raybould and former Treasury Board president Jane Philpott from the Liberal caucus this week, Conservatives effectively served notice Friday that they're not letting the Liberal government off the hook over allegations of political interference in criminal cases.
"We aren't going to turn the page on the rule-of-law corruption from this government," former Conservative veterans minister Erin O'Toole said Friday as debate began on an opposition motion which, among other things, repeated a demand that the federal government cover Norman's legal bills.
The motion also insisted that senior political staff and bureaucrats around Prime Minister Justin Trudeau sign "an affidavit affirming that no evidence or records" related to the criminal case against the former vice chief of the defence staff have been destroyed.
The Conservatives have made similar demands before as they've pressed the Liberal government to account for inconsistencies and allegations of political interference in the prosecution of Norman, who faces a single count of breach of trust.
The Crown accused of him of leaking cabinet secrets to a shipyard executive and a CBC journalist related to a $668 million deal to lease a supply ship for the navy.
Former justice minister Jody Wilson-Raybould referenced the Norman case in her secretly-recorded conversation with Clerk of the Privy Council Michael Wernick, suggesting alleged attempts to interfere in SNC Lavalin's prosecution could taint the public's perceptions of both the extradition of Huawei executive Meng Wanzhou and the Norman case.
'This is worse than the SNC-Lavalin scandal'
"Canadians should be outraged," said O'Toole.
"This is worse than the SNC scandal ... you may have issues with a company and bad practice by a company, but here is a Canadian who gave three decades of his life to his country, and before that grew up in a family serving the country, who is being hung out to dry."
The parliamentary secretary for the justice minister, Arif Virani, responded — as the government has before when faced with questions about the Norman case — by chastising the opposition for talking about a matter still before the courts.
Norman's lawyers will be back in court in two weeks to resume their fight for access to federal government documents to prove their theory that his prosecution is politically motivated.
The federal government has released a few thousand pages of internal documents, but many pertinent ones — including Wernick's 60 page memo on the case to Trudeau — have been redacted due to solicitor-client privilege.
The Conservatives repeatedly have sought assurances that government documents related to the case have not been destroyed. They've attempted to connect the handling of Norman's case against Norman with a scandal that erupted in Ontario over the cancellation of gas plant construction under the former Liberal government of Dalton McGuinty. Government records were destroyed in the course of that scandal.
O'Toole pointed out that many of Trudeau's government's current and ex-senior advisers served in the McGuinty government, or its successor under former premier Kathleen Wynne.
"That was the same crew that brought us the billion-dollar scandal in Ontario," he said.
The RCMP have separately charged a mid-level federal government procurement official with leaking cabinet secrets related to the same shipbuilding deal.
Matthew Matchett is also charged with breach of trust. He is accused of leaking a cabinet memo and slide deck presentation to an Ottawa lobbyist working for one of the shipyards before a meeting on Nov. 19, 2015, while Norman is alleged to have disclosed the results of the secret discussions
O'Toole insisted that Norman was the "only one [that] has been set up as the fall guy."
The opposition motion will be voted on next week
 

Mowich

Hall of Fame Member
Dec 25, 2005
16,649
998
113
75
Eagle Creek
BONOKOSKI: Vice-Admiral Mark Norman and the sinking of the HMCS Trudeau

Seeing as the Trudeau Liberals and their vainglorious leader have been rattled to the gunnels by silly antics, ethics breaches, leaks, miscalculations and scandals, the mere mention of Vice-Admiral Mark Norman’s name must bring on visions of yet another hell on the horizon.

His preliminary hearing in Ottawa for allegedly leaking government secrets to influence cabinet’s decision on a $700 million shipbuilding contract with Quebec’s Davie shipyard has been moving with the slowness of a snail, and will not resume again until May 8.

Admiral Norman, who has denied any wrongdoing, has hired a marquee defence team from Toronto, headed by Marie Henein, best known eviscerating the accusers of former CBC radio star Jian Ghomeshi that saw him acquitted of a lengthy list of sexual assault charges. When and if Justice Heather Perkins-McVey decides whether there is enough evidence to send Norman to trial, that criminal proceeding will occur smack-dab in the middle of the final leg of Justin Trudeau’s run for re-election.

After ethics breaches, illegal holidays, an embarrassing dress-up trip to India, the burning of bridges to vital trade relationships, the bouncing of two key cabinet ministers, the resignation of his best friend and principal advisor, the early retirement of the Clerk of the Privy Council, carbon-tax fights with five very pissed-off premiers and the Lavscam scandal, the last thing Trudeau needs is another bump in the road. But Norman looms large as that bump, just like the trial of an innocent ‘Ol Duff for senatorial expense jiggery-pokery did nothing to help Stephen Harper and the Conservatives during the 2015 election.

Norman is not some ordinary seaman, after all, but the second-in-command of Canada’s entire armed forces, albeit now suspended. Defence counsel is presently focused on outgoing Privy Council Clerk Michael Wernick, who wrote his goodbye Thursday, and how he blew his cover of solicitor-client privilege when he spoke publicly of Norman during the Commons justice committee doing its shallow dive into the Lavscam scandal.

One of Norman’s lawyer, Christine Manville, argued that despite the government claiming privilege for documents by Wernick related to the case, they should be released to the defence because Wernick himself told the justice committee that “the easiest way to deal with the Norman matter was to let the judge decide what is relevant.” The key document the defence wants to get its dubs on is an uncensored copy of the 60-page memo Wernick wrote to Trudeau on the Norman affair, claiming the document is vital to mounting a solid defence for the admiral.

And then, of course, there is the spectre of Scott Brison, the long-timeLiberal cabinet minister with Conservative roots, who suddenly resigned and fled government around the same time Norman went down. Brison, a Nova Scotian, has long been associated with backing the Irving shipbuilding company in Halifax, the rival of Davie shipyard.

Norman’s defence is trying diligently to drag Brison into the mix, citing him as instrumental in the leak-prone cabinet meeting at the heart of the case.

It’s all very toxic with, like Lavscam, Trudeau and his inner circle standing accused of attempting to hold back key evidence that could potentially bring more damage to their already battered brand.

But, day by day, something new seems to surface.

And none of it good for the PM’s fading star.

https://torontosun.com/opinion/colu...rk-norman-and-the-sinking-of-the-hmcs-trudeau
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ron in Regina

spilledthebeer

Executive Branch Member
Jan 26, 2017
9,296
4
36
I'll defend Hoid.

When the check clears.




Typical lawyer!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


All the legal defense you can PAY FOR!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
 

Curious Cdn

Hall of Fame Member
Feb 22, 2015
37,070
6
36
And then, of course, there is the spectre of Scott Brison, ... in the scuppers with the staggers and jags ...