Bush and Blair unleash horror and violence against the People of Iraq and now occupy the country they devastated. The People of Britain reelected this warmonger. Why would they be exempt from the evils they support reigning on other?
Terrorist attack in London
- Thread starter HOCK
- Start date
Yup!
It didn't take long for these things to start popping up now did it.
Failure of the US... failure of Bush... Israel Cover-up... Christian Fudamentalist... need I go on.
Dipping the flag of hatred in the Blood of England's Sons and Daughters.
Shame
It didn't take long for these things to start popping up now did it.
Failure of the US... failure of Bush... Israel Cover-up... Christian Fudamentalist... need I go on.
Dipping the flag of hatred in the Blood of England's Sons and Daughters.
Shame
Re: RE: Terrorist attack in London
Answer: The inspectors were on-site and finding nothing. Saddam brought nothing on. He was head of a sovereign Nation and should not have to capitulate to the extent that the U.S. sought. He was lied to be the American ambassator when he sought to stop Kuwait from slant drilling into Iraqi oil fields. He and his country were victims of two massive invasion. And now Bush is trying to claim the highground. Not one Iraqi attacked the U.S. Stop perpitrating war and perhaps others will not attempt to carry war into your backyard. I applauded the Chenznians bringing their war to Moscow and I would support the Iraqis visiting that war upon the invaders.
Jay said:
Answer: The inspectors were on-site and finding nothing. Saddam brought nothing on. He was head of a sovereign Nation and should not have to capitulate to the extent that the U.S. sought. He was lied to be the American ambassator when he sought to stop Kuwait from slant drilling into Iraqi oil fields. He and his country were victims of two massive invasion. And now Bush is trying to claim the highground. Not one Iraqi attacked the U.S. Stop perpitrating war and perhaps others will not attempt to carry war into your backyard. I applauded the Chenznians bringing their war to Moscow and I would support the Iraqis visiting that war upon the invaders.
Re: RE: Terrorist attack in London
I'm sure you do applaud that....you sound like a terrorist.
Saddam was fooled into thinking we wouldn't attack them over Kuwait? We gave him what, a month to pull out? What ever....
Saddam was even criticized by An Arab leader for not stepping down, he alone (being a dictator and everything) caused his problems...and PS it was a UN action that brought him to his knees.
PoisonPete2 said:
I'm sure you do applaud that....you sound like a terrorist.
Saddam was fooled into thinking we wouldn't attack them over Kuwait? We gave him what, a month to pull out? What ever....
Saddam was even criticized by An Arab leader for not stepping down, he alone (being a dictator and everything) caused his problems...and PS it was a UN action that brought him to his knees.
Jay Saddam was told he could invade Kuwait by the US goverment I can find the links if you want :wink:
mrmom2 said:
Fair and unbiased links?
I did not know that the US and Iraqis were in discussion of the invasion of Kuwait. So from what you say the conversation went something like this...
"Do you have any problem with me sending my army into Kuwait?" asked Saddam
"Not at all. You can invade Kuwait." answered the US.
A group calling itself "The Secret Organization of al-Qaida in Europe" posted a claim of responsibility for Thursday's blasts in London, saying they were in retaliation for Britain's involvement in Iraq and Afghanistan.
Hmmm --- sounds like the legendary "Vanguard of the Second Army of Mohammed" that supposedly attacked the UN compound in Baghdad and killed Minister De Mello (known by many as the biggest enemy of USA imperialism in the world before his assassination). Prior to this strange attack, in which a huge unmarked truck was allowed into the UN area without having been stopped even once unlike every other vehicle around, no one ever heard of that organization. Interestingly, it has not been heard from ever since, either.
Spain's Islamic authority has declared war on al-Qaeda and knows its whereabouts in Europe better than any other organization or nation. How strange it is that they did not tip off # 10 Downing Street that an attack was imminent. That is, assuming it was done by al-Qaeda and not by anyone else with a pro-war agenda in mind. No population in Europe is more anti-war than are the British. So ask yourself, why would anyone or any group try to attack a population that is so openly anti-war???
One thing more --- former al-Qaeda allies such as Barzani, Talebani, and Jafiri control Iraq. They would know more than anyone else is a splinter group would attack Europe. That is, assuming it was such a group that committed this act.
Seems to me that Middle Easterners have had a real easy time of making sympathetic friends in the UK. Why anyone from the ME would want to make the British pro-war is beyond all reason. That's what makes me think this "attack" doesn't sound like it came from a ME source.
Hmmm --- sounds like the legendary "Vanguard of the Second Army of Mohammed" that supposedly attacked the UN compound in Baghdad and killed Minister De Mello (known by many as the biggest enemy of USA imperialism in the world before his assassination). Prior to this strange attack, in which a huge unmarked truck was allowed into the UN area without having been stopped even once unlike every other vehicle around, no one ever heard of that organization. Interestingly, it has not been heard from ever since, either.
Spain's Islamic authority has declared war on al-Qaeda and knows its whereabouts in Europe better than any other organization or nation. How strange it is that they did not tip off # 10 Downing Street that an attack was imminent. That is, assuming it was done by al-Qaeda and not by anyone else with a pro-war agenda in mind. No population in Europe is more anti-war than are the British. So ask yourself, why would anyone or any group try to attack a population that is so openly anti-war???
One thing more --- former al-Qaeda allies such as Barzani, Talebani, and Jafiri control Iraq. They would know more than anyone else is a splinter group would attack Europe. That is, assuming it was such a group that committed this act.
Seems to me that Middle Easterners have had a real easy time of making sympathetic friends in the UK. Why anyone from the ME would want to make the British pro-war is beyond all reason. That's what makes me think this "attack" doesn't sound like it came from a ME source.
EagleSmack said:
Answer: Very close. The Iraqi mission brought proof to the American Ambassador of Kuwait's drilling. The American ambassador told the Iraqis that it was a 'regional matter' and that the U.S. would not interfere. Should remind you that Kuwait was a breakaway state from Iraq and remains under absolute rule. There is no democracy it Kuwait.
Somebody in a Forum like this post's and says it was Al Qaida and thats the proof so far 8O Well if thats the case I say It was the Military industrial complex that planned this and carried it out they stand to gain the most from this horrible event :wink:
RE: Terrorist attack in L
Whoever did this, and the Police Service is still saying that they don't know, were amateurs. If they had been professionals, it would have been a lot worse.
Some thing very positive about the British reaction...nobody in charge is running around pointing fingers at likely suspects. Instead they are waiting for facts and measuring their words very carefully.
Whoever did this, and the Police Service is still saying that they don't know, were amateurs. If they had been professionals, it would have been a lot worse.
Some thing very positive about the British reaction...nobody in charge is running around pointing fingers at likely suspects. Instead they are waiting for facts and measuring their words very carefully.
Your right Rev did you hear the police say there going to create order out of chaos 8O NWO rhetoric to a tee :wink:
Re: RE: Terrorist attack in London
I'm sorry Pete, but that argument is so shallow and vindictive that, frankly, it's beneath contempt. You don't know the first thing about the victims of these bombings, or the families that will be devastated by this. You don't know their ages, their religion, their political views. You don't know who they voted for. You don't even know their nationalities. You don't know who they are or were, just like the psychopaths who carried out this atrocity. And yet you feel able to judge them, and imply that "they" somehow how deserved to be killed and maimed. There's a great deal of resistance to the so-called 'war on terror' in the UK, and you can bet that many of those killed and injured were just as opposed to it as you or I. Many people will blame the government for this, but nobody in their right minds can blame the unknown occupants of the number 30 bus to Marble Arch, or the 08:10 train to King's Cross. i've heard of simplistic, but that's just plain simple. To condemn Blair as a warmonger, and then spout bile like that, borders on hypocrisy. Take a look at yourself, Pete.
The death and devastation in Iraq is wrong, but that doesn't make this right.
PoisonPete2 said:
I'm sorry Pete, but that argument is so shallow and vindictive that, frankly, it's beneath contempt. You don't know the first thing about the victims of these bombings, or the families that will be devastated by this. You don't know their ages, their religion, their political views. You don't know who they voted for. You don't even know their nationalities. You don't know who they are or were, just like the psychopaths who carried out this atrocity. And yet you feel able to judge them, and imply that "they" somehow how deserved to be killed and maimed. There's a great deal of resistance to the so-called 'war on terror' in the UK, and you can bet that many of those killed and injured were just as opposed to it as you or I. Many people will blame the government for this, but nobody in their right minds can blame the unknown occupants of the number 30 bus to Marble Arch, or the 08:10 train to King's Cross. i've heard of simplistic, but that's just plain simple. To condemn Blair as a warmonger, and then spout bile like that, borders on hypocrisy. Take a look at yourself, Pete.
The death and devastation in Iraq is wrong, but that doesn't make this right.
Well said Henry I'm glad to see you back How was Stongehenge?Have the authorities over there released any of the survielance tapes from the camera's in the area?