Aren't you assuming that she hasn't already investigated all the possibilities? She may well have and assessed the risks and then made her decision. Honestly, I don't dispute alternative treatments, I do think there are many out there that can do a lot of good (and some out there that are practiced by charlatans and scam artists too) but one thing that makes me wary is any 'doctor' using the word 'cure' along with 'stage 4 cancer'. Cancer does not get cured....cancer goes into remission.
Apparently not those under his care - they don't go into remission but are actually cured. Now how high his success rate is, I don't know. I just recently heard about his story (and other physicians who practice wholistic medicine (along with conventional medicine)
and who are often targets of the FDA. I don't know the full story, obviously, but I thought it was really interesting, for sure!
I understand that the FDA has taken this Texas Doctor to court several times despite him having produced survivors of his treatments to testify on his behalf. The fact that hundreds of individuals are well and were initially given only months to live or were literally on their death beds, but are still surviving after anywhere from 3 to 8 plus years after undergoing his treatments apparently is not relevant to the FDA..
Guess the pharma's have their influence (aka $$) in the FDA. Protecting consumers is one thing; rejecting treatments that might benefit consumers because there's no money in it is another.
There are those who go into remission had chemo and radiation only to have the cancer return more aggressively than before which happened to a friend of mine - she was in remission and, hopefully had conquered it but it came back so aggressively she died literally weeks afterwards.
The survivors of this doctor's treatments (apparently) have been actually "cured".
I have to admit though, that if I didn't have the alternatives, I would want to "go" my way, for sure and I wouldn't want anyone to suffer the consequences of my decision.
JMHO