Ten things we learned in 2004 about 9/11

moghrabi

moghrabi

House Member
May 25, 2004
4,508
4
38
Canada
Re: RE: Ten things we learned in 2004 about 9/11

Rick van Opbergen said:
moghrabi, I know you have presented them before, but do you still have the same links about the hijackers who were reportedly to be still alive?
Click to expand...

I think they are posted here somewhere. Any google search on live 9/11 hijackers should give you some results.
 
moghrabi

moghrabi

House Member
May 25, 2004
4,508
4
38
Canada
Re: RE: Ten things we learned in 2004 about 9/11

Rick van Opbergen said:
moghrabi, I know you have presented them before, but do you still have the same links about the hijackers who were reportedly to be still alive?
Click to expand...

I think they are posted here somewhere. Any google search on live 9/11 hijackers should give you some results.
 
moghrabi

moghrabi

House Member
May 25, 2004
4,508
4
38
Canada
Re: RE: Ten things we learned in 2004 about 9/11

Rick van Opbergen said:
moghrabi, I know you have presented them before, but do you still have the same links about the hijackers who were reportedly to be still alive?
Click to expand...

I think they are posted here somewhere. Any google search on live 9/11 hijackers should give you some results.
 
Stretch

Stretch

House Member
Feb 16, 2003
3,924
19
38
Australia
yes I do...... to believe that we are the only creatures in the universe is rather ummmmm arrogant, dont you think?
 
Stretch

Stretch

House Member
Feb 16, 2003
3,924
19
38
Australia
yes I do...... to believe that we are the only creatures in the universe is rather ummmmm arrogant, dont you think?
 
Stretch

Stretch

House Member
Feb 16, 2003
3,924
19
38
Australia
yes I do...... to believe that we are the only creatures in the universe is rather ummmmm arrogant, dont you think?
 
Stretch

Stretch

House Member
Feb 16, 2003
3,924
19
38
Australia
THE CLUE
First Clue -- Few Passengers On The Four Flights: Many have remarked about the short passenger lists on the four 911 jets. You might get a low turnout for a 767 or 757 now and then, but four coast to-coast flights taking off from the East inside of a few minutes of each other, all with short passenger lists? Nuts. That's your first clue.

Second Clue -- First Report of First WTC Crash: The second clue comes from the first New York eyewitness on NBC. She had no question about what she saw. You could hear it in her voice. If she was the state's witness, the defense team would have their heads between their knees before she stopped talking.

What did she say? She heard an airplane coming in low and looked up. She saw a small private jet, and watched it fly into the first WTC tower, the North tower. She was certain in her description -- most people know the difference between a big round-nose commercial jet and a smaller plane.

http://www.public-action.com/911/bumble.html
 
Stretch

Stretch

House Member
Feb 16, 2003
3,924
19
38
Australia
THE CLUE
First Clue -- Few Passengers On The Four Flights: Many have remarked about the short passenger lists on the four 911 jets. You might get a low turnout for a 767 or 757 now and then, but four coast to-coast flights taking off from the East inside of a few minutes of each other, all with short passenger lists? Nuts. That's your first clue.

Second Clue -- First Report of First WTC Crash: The second clue comes from the first New York eyewitness on NBC. She had no question about what she saw. You could hear it in her voice. If she was the state's witness, the defense team would have their heads between their knees before she stopped talking.

What did she say? She heard an airplane coming in low and looked up. She saw a small private jet, and watched it fly into the first WTC tower, the North tower. She was certain in her description -- most people know the difference between a big round-nose commercial jet and a smaller plane.

http://www.public-action.com/911/bumble.html
 
Stretch

Stretch

House Member
Feb 16, 2003
3,924
19
38
Australia
THE CLUE
First Clue -- Few Passengers On The Four Flights: Many have remarked about the short passenger lists on the four 911 jets. You might get a low turnout for a 767 or 757 now and then, but four coast to-coast flights taking off from the East inside of a few minutes of each other, all with short passenger lists? Nuts. That's your first clue.

Second Clue -- First Report of First WTC Crash: The second clue comes from the first New York eyewitness on NBC. She had no question about what she saw. You could hear it in her voice. If she was the state's witness, the defense team would have their heads between their knees before she stopped talking.

What did she say? She heard an airplane coming in low and looked up. She saw a small private jet, and watched it fly into the first WTC tower, the North tower. She was certain in her description -- most people know the difference between a big round-nose commercial jet and a smaller plane.

http://www.public-action.com/911/bumble.html
 
R

Rick van Opbergen

House Member
Sep 16, 2004
4,080
0
36
The Netherlands
www.google.com
Stretch, you can not prove your own story when you ask me to prove otherwise? I asked you what the base is of the allegation that the passengers of the Boeing 757 were taken to underground bases in the US. I haven't received any answer.

And is "... to believe that we are the only creatures in the universe is rather ummmmm arrogant ..." your only reason to believe there are other forms of life in the universe?

Ah I see, this is the link you presented some time ago, moghrabi:

http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/hijackers.html
 
R

Rick van Opbergen

House Member
Sep 16, 2004
4,080
0
36
The Netherlands
www.google.com
Stretch, you can not prove your own story when you ask me to prove otherwise? I asked you what the base is of the allegation that the passengers of the Boeing 757 were taken to underground bases in the US. I haven't received any answer.

And is "... to believe that we are the only creatures in the universe is rather ummmmm arrogant ..." your only reason to believe there are other forms of life in the universe?

Ah I see, this is the link you presented some time ago, moghrabi:

http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/hijackers.html
 
R

Rick van Opbergen

House Member
Sep 16, 2004
4,080
0
36
The Netherlands
www.google.com
Stretch, you can not prove your own story when you ask me to prove otherwise? I asked you what the base is of the allegation that the passengers of the Boeing 757 were taken to underground bases in the US. I haven't received any answer.

And is "... to believe that we are the only creatures in the universe is rather ummmmm arrogant ..." your only reason to believe there are other forms of life in the universe?

Ah I see, this is the link you presented some time ago, moghrabi:

http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/hijackers.html
 
Stretch

Stretch

House Member
Feb 16, 2003
3,924
19
38
Australia
The Evidence Filter
Any scenario constructed to account for the events of September 11, 2001 must pass a
graduated test, as embodied in the following items. These fall into three classes:

Suspicious circumstances
1. Four of the named hijackers were not in the United States.
2. The WTC towers collapsed without adequate heat stress.
3. Smaller aircraft accompanied Flights 77 and 93.
4. Most of the alleged hijackers were rather poor pilots.
5. Evidence of the alleged hijackers developed too quickly.
6. Westward excursion of Flights UA93 and AA77 are inexplicable as terrorists hurrying to targets."

Anomalies
1. The US Air Force failed to intercept any of the flights.
2. The hijackers' names did not show up on passenger lists.
3. The hijackers' faces did not appear on boarding gate videos.
4. Black boxes were missing from all but one flight.

Contradictions
1. The Pentagon was not struck by a large passenger aircraft.
2. Cell phone calls alleged to have been made by passengers were essentially impossible

http://www.linkcrusader.com/9-11WTC+NWOinfo.htm
 
Stretch

Stretch

House Member
Feb 16, 2003
3,924
19
38
Australia
The Evidence Filter
Any scenario constructed to account for the events of September 11, 2001 must pass a
graduated test, as embodied in the following items. These fall into three classes:

Suspicious circumstances
1. Four of the named hijackers were not in the United States.
2. The WTC towers collapsed without adequate heat stress.
3. Smaller aircraft accompanied Flights 77 and 93.
4. Most of the alleged hijackers were rather poor pilots.
5. Evidence of the alleged hijackers developed too quickly.
6. Westward excursion of Flights UA93 and AA77 are inexplicable as terrorists hurrying to targets."

Anomalies
1. The US Air Force failed to intercept any of the flights.
2. The hijackers' names did not show up on passenger lists.
3. The hijackers' faces did not appear on boarding gate videos.
4. Black boxes were missing from all but one flight.

Contradictions
1. The Pentagon was not struck by a large passenger aircraft.
2. Cell phone calls alleged to have been made by passengers were essentially impossible

http://www.linkcrusader.com/9-11WTC+NWOinfo.htm
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom