Ten things we learned in 2004 about 9/11

Stretch

House Member
Feb 16, 2003
3,924
19
38
Australia
The Evidence Filter
Any scenario constructed to account for the events of September 11, 2001 must pass a
graduated test, as embodied in the following items. These fall into three classes:

Suspicious circumstances
1. Four of the named hijackers were not in the United States.
2. The WTC towers collapsed without adequate heat stress.
3. Smaller aircraft accompanied Flights 77 and 93.
4. Most of the alleged hijackers were rather poor pilots.
5. Evidence of the alleged hijackers developed too quickly.
6. Westward excursion of Flights UA93 and AA77 are inexplicable as terrorists hurrying to targets."

Anomalies
1. The US Air Force failed to intercept any of the flights.
2. The hijackers' names did not show up on passenger lists.
3. The hijackers' faces did not appear on boarding gate videos.
4. Black boxes were missing from all but one flight.

Contradictions
1. The Pentagon was not struck by a large passenger aircraft.
2. Cell phone calls alleged to have been made by passengers were essentially impossible

http://www.linkcrusader.com/9-11WTC+NWOinfo.htm
 

Stretch

House Member
Feb 16, 2003
3,924
19
38
Australia
yes mate I do believe there are other life forms in the universe.

I was giving my opinion re the underground bases
Nothing surprises me anymore

and sadly, "the end justifies the means"
 

Stretch

House Member
Feb 16, 2003
3,924
19
38
Australia
yes mate I do believe there are other life forms in the universe.

I was giving my opinion re the underground bases
Nothing surprises me anymore

and sadly, "the end justifies the means"
 

Stretch

House Member
Feb 16, 2003
3,924
19
38
Australia
yes mate I do believe there are other life forms in the universe.

I was giving my opinion re the underground bases
Nothing surprises me anymore

and sadly, "the end justifies the means"
 

Rick van Opbergen

House Member
Sep 16, 2004
4,080
0
36
The Netherlands
www.google.com
But that's not an answer right? Look what your links about the Pentagon plane described was very interesting, but in that case I'm just wondering what happened to the Boeing 757 passengers. Is that question however unanswerrable? So far it has not been answered, to my opinion. The possibility that they have been taken to certain underground bases is as far credible as any other assumption, not? I'm not saying that the allegations given in your links concerning the Pentagon crash are rubbish - but it's essential for me to know what happened to these passengers if I want to believe these links. Don't you feel the same?
 

Rick van Opbergen

House Member
Sep 16, 2004
4,080
0
36
The Netherlands
www.google.com
But that's not an answer right? Look what your links about the Pentagon plane described was very interesting, but in that case I'm just wondering what happened to the Boeing 757 passengers. Is that question however unanswerrable? So far it has not been answered, to my opinion. The possibility that they have been taken to certain underground bases is as far credible as any other assumption, not? I'm not saying that the allegations given in your links concerning the Pentagon crash are rubbish - but it's essential for me to know what happened to these passengers if I want to believe these links. Don't you feel the same?
 

Rick van Opbergen

House Member
Sep 16, 2004
4,080
0
36
The Netherlands
www.google.com
But that's not an answer right? Look what your links about the Pentagon plane described was very interesting, but in that case I'm just wondering what happened to the Boeing 757 passengers. Is that question however unanswerrable? So far it has not been answered, to my opinion. The possibility that they have been taken to certain underground bases is as far credible as any other assumption, not? I'm not saying that the allegations given in your links concerning the Pentagon crash are rubbish - but it's essential for me to know what happened to these passengers if I want to believe these links. Don't you feel the same?