Using that analogy Britain has the right to steal back one-fifth of the world's land area.
Taking Back a Stolen Homeland - Scotland
- Thread starter tay
- Start date
Using that analogy Britain has the right to steal back one-fifth of the world's land area.
I am afraid, Captain, those "Thin Red Lines" would be blood.
Speaking of Balaclava, the reserves in Canada, and American reservations both belong to Mother Russia, as the blood line can be easily traced to Siberia. Borsch anyone?
Oh, and our Inuit, just here a thousand years. They can be understood in northern Siberia. Goodbye Nunavut!
meanwhile, back in ole caledonia.....
Refer ye to my Great Granny in action...:lol:
Clan O'Galtieri? What Glen they be from , Sassenach?:lol:
Feudal based land systems are inherently bizarre.
And General Washington.
And General Collins.
And General Gandhi.
Amongst others.
Face it, Little England. You lost the Empire because you lost the brains and balls to hold it. You are the inadequate sons of great fathers.
I'd like you to name an empire that lasted for eternity. (If you can).
George Washington was a crap military leader, by the way. And Gandhi was a terrorist.
And some of us marry each other.
After that crap with Scottish landowners, the Irish bluddy well should have, though.
ahhyuh.
That's ok. The Irish don't care what you think either. Kind of two-faced to accuse other people of doing what you'd been doing for many years before. Native North Americans should have been a lot more suspicious of your ilk. Hindsight is 20/20, though. On the other hand, quite a few aboriginals have managed to utilize your shifty methods and used them on you, which is cause for much squawking and flapping amongst you, and have maintained their pride in themselves and their accomplishments. You just can't beat their spirit, so get over it.
Come get some then, Brit.
Anishinaabemowin (that'd be Ojibwe to most Canucks, and Chippewa to most Uhmarcans) has distinct similarities to Apache. Original "Canadians" came from a variety of places.
Like Eli Wallach said in The Good, The Bad, And The Ugly, "If you gonna shoot, shoot. Don't talk". John Wayne in True Grit, "Fill yer hand, you SOB". And I say, "Pitterpatter, let's git at er".
None have, which just goes to show that empire builders are too stupid to realize they are fighting a losing battle.
Irrelevant, right? I mean the USA isn't part of the UK, and Ghandi had a vastly more moral cause than just acquiring real estate and goodies.
Not really. Don't forget that the Americans lost more battles than they won in the War of Independence. We kicked YOUR ****.
That's like saying "we had more shots on goal than you did."
Final score is what counts.
Face it, Tunbridge Wells. You are a client state of your former colony. Your only significance in the world is to provide an inadequate, incapable military contingent to provide us with the illusion of internationalism when we decide to go to war.
I'll never deny you were once great. Then again, so was Italy. And Egypt. And Greece.
You didn't really win, though, did you?
You only "won" because the American colonies were relatively unimportant to Great Britain and she had more pressing concerns than fighting a bunch of farmers with pitchforks - namely Old Boney's nefarious activities in Europe. So we just gave you your independence so we could deal with the more important matter of defeating Boney.
It's lucky for you that Boney did what he did. Or you would never have won the War of Independence.
Still, we came back in 1812 and kicked you arses in that war. We also did the White House good and proper.
Speaking of battles won, how is it the Yanks won five of six single-ship engagements in Mr. Madison's War?
I'm sure Little Englander history teaches that y'all won that war. Any sensible person'd call it "inconclusive."
As I said before, y'all were great once. The mightiest empire in history. Now you're the client of your former colony.
I calculate it's because British men were once like Lord Cochrane and Tommy Watson, and now they're like you.