Syria ponders filing UN complaint following helicopter attack

Praxius

Mass'Debater
Dec 18, 2007
10,677
161
63
Halifax, NS & Melbourne, VIC
Why should I say that... you mentioned it because you know it is a fact... any Joe schmo can write it!

Well facts are never facts, because in the philosophical sense of everything in the universe, nothing is ever fact, but when more information is supported with logical explinations that the majority believe compared to the counter arguments which hold no substance, one has to use common sense, and thus come to the above conclusions.

believe what you want, in the end the results and reactions will be the truth. Either play it safe and avoid situations you may not want to go through, or just don't give a crap and deal with what comes your way..... if you choose the later, then I have no sympathy for what comes.

1.2 Million... 600,000+... quite a swing huh? I even find it hard that you posted that Prax.

Do you have a problem with understanding the basic concept being presented or do you just like hearing yourself argue? It doesn't matter if it's 1.2 million, 600,000 or a trillion.... too many have died for something that should have never occured.... is it too complicated for you to figure out?

Oh but I guess since the numbers can't be verified to an exact number (Because you guys never bothered to "Keep body counts" cuz it's not good for propaganda) it must be zero and everybody is just fine, is that it?

Obviously it's not, so what's the point of arguing the numbers when the numbers don't actually matter and they wern't the point in the first place?

Oh that's right, to avoid dealing with the actual known truth. :roll:

With numbers that far off...do you think there is some guess work? Fabrication? Biased? Fantasy?

Do you think it's fabrication, bias or fantasy to trivialize and act like nothing is wrong? Cuz that's all you have been doing so far in this thread. You don't want to face that there might actually be something wrong and that it might be wise to try and make things somewhat better..... you just want to argue irrelevent numbers to continue to argue there's nothing wrong.... or that your country has a big part in what is wrong.

Oh a US University... well since our education SUCKS so bad as you keep reminding us... that means our University Surveys and Research must suck too! All the Professors and Students are idiots so their data is a big pile of stupid US junk.

Typical response..... oh and since all of my arguments about your piss poor education in your country have been focused on your elementary and high schools, not your universities, you're still wrong.

Thanks for playing.

Thanks for the help in proving my point.

You have to have a point first before you can prove it.

Yeah there is something out there that refuted the door to door survey. The surveyors were counting EVERY death including illness and old age. I'll try and find it.

I'm sure you will.

Good point...you saved me time.

Yup.... continue to prove my point as always... you get a little challenge so you don't bother, and yet expect others to swallow your tripe without evidence..... nice game you play, but I don't buy it.

Really? Wasn't Saddam Hussein the leader? Is he no longer the mass murderer or did he somehow in death gets absolved of all his sins.

And what does that have to do with your illegal invasion?

Oh yeah, it doesn't. And nobody said he was obsolved of his crimes or that any of his crimes didn't matter..... they pale in comparison to what your country did to Iraq and the ends that have yet to be seen still don't justify your means, no matter how long you guys plan on hanging around there to get blown up.
 

Zzarchov

House Member
Aug 28, 2006
4,600
100
63
Prax, Did you not read what that 655,000 number was?

This many people "might have" been alive if the US hadn't invaded. Thats a worst case scenario number, or rather the best case scenario number if everyone has died in Iraq since 2003 had lived. Heart attack? Maybe hospital times would have been better without an invasion - Mark one death, etc,

but it doesn't take into account the fact that 1.) alot if not all of those people would have died either way (perhaps with better meds the cancer patient would die a year later, but still was going to die) 2.) those who would have died but now live (in Areas like northern Iraq which went from hellhole to stable functioning infrastructure and peaceful life)

You can't blame someone for "may have beens", lets get deaths.
 

Avro

Time Out
Feb 12, 2007
7,815
65
48
56
Oshawa
Prax, Did you not read what that 655,000 number was?

This many people "might have" been alive if the US hadn't invaded. Thats a worst case scenario number, or rather the best case scenario number if everyone has died in Iraq since 2003 had lived. Heart attack? Maybe hospital times would have been better without an invasion - Mark one death, etc,

but it doesn't take into account the fact that 1.) alot if not all of those people would have died either way (perhaps with better meds the cancer patient would die a year later, but still was going to die) 2.) those who would have died but now live (in Areas like northern Iraq which went from hellhole to stable functioning infrastructure and peaceful life)

You can't blame someone for "may have beens", lets get deaths.

Who cares?

If Iraqis' didn't like the situation they were in it was up to them to fix it.

We in the West can't hug everyone to make it better.

Unlike the neo-con agenda I'd like to take care of ourselves rather than the rest.:roll:
 

Praxius

Mass'Debater
Dec 18, 2007
10,677
161
63
Halifax, NS & Melbourne, VIC
Prax, Did you not read what that 655,000 number was?

This many people "might have" been alive if the US hadn't invaded. Thats a worst case scenario number, or rather the best case scenario number if everyone has died in Iraq since 2003 had lived. Heart attack? Maybe hospital times would have been better without an invasion - Mark one death, etc,

but it doesn't take into account the fact that 1.) alot if not all of those people would have died either way (perhaps with better meds the cancer patient would die a year later, but still was going to die) 2.) those who would have died but now live (in Areas like northern Iraq which went from hellhole to stable functioning infrastructure and peaceful life)

You can't blame someone for "may have beens", lets get deaths.

Sure I can, as I just very well did. So you're gonna sit there and tell me most, if not all of those recorded as dead by the invasion would most likely have died of natural causes between 2003 and today, therefore..... what? The US is doing them a favor by air striking their asses to death?

Common sense would tell anybody that natural deaths occur in all kinds of ways everyday..... perhaps you should re-read what exactly I said:

"That is why none of these report's numbers really matter to the bigger picture, which is the fact that the great majority of these deaths wouldn't have occured if your president didn't start this corrupt invasion in the first place."

^ In other words, you sure as hell can't tell me all these civilians would have simply died of natural causes between 2003 and today to simply balance out the actual violent deaths that have occured since 2003 by the US's actions of invading Iraq, plain and simple.

More people have died because of this invasion then there would have if the invasion never occured..... frig a monkey with a chunk of his brain missing could understand this..... why is this so complicated for you?

Oh yes, because you'd hate to possibly think the US or even our nation has some responsibility in their deaths and the violent distabalization that have been there since the invasion.
 

Praxius

Mass'Debater
Dec 18, 2007
10,677
161
63
Halifax, NS & Melbourne, VIC
Who cares?

If Iraqis' didn't like the situation they were in it was up to them to fix it.

We in the West can't hug everyone to make it better.

Unlike the neo-con agenda I'd like to take care of ourselves rather than the rest.:roll:

Listen to how stupid that sounds.....

If Iraqi's didn't like the situation they were in, they should fix it? Well that's all well and good if you guys didn't blow the sh*t out of their resources, military, government and everything else that they used to structure their country..... along with you guys still occupying their nation.

That's like telling the doctor to stich up the patient while you still got your grubby finger poking at their liver.

They can't do a damn thing while you guys are continually blowing them up and trying to force them to assemilate to your way of life.... it ain't gonna happen.

But typical response.... put the blame all on the Iraqi's.... cuz it's their fault the invasion and your image of being a savior went down the crapper.

Oh no.... Iraq got bombed into the stone ages and anybody who they thought were a terrorist or insurgent got killed.... and now that the US has totally turned their nation into an imploding slum, yet it's their responsibility to pick up the pieces, look past all their loved one's killed and forget everything that happened and still is and accept the US as their "Saviors."

Cripes.... I wouldn't swallow that if it was covered in bacon bits.
 

EagleSmack

Hall of Fame Member
Feb 16, 2005
44,168
96
48
USA
Well facts are never facts, because in the philosophical sense of everything in the universe, nothing is ever fact, but when more information is supported with logical explinations that the majority believe compared to the counter arguments which hold no substance, one has to use common sense, and thus come to the above conclusions.

believe what you want, in the end the results and reactions will be the truth. Either play it safe and avoid situations you may not want to go through, or just don't give a crap and deal with what comes your way..... if you choose the later, then I have no sympathy for what comes.

Facts are never facts? Good one.

The last sentence because it reminds me of certain people.


Do you have a problem with understanding the basic concept being presented or do you just like hearing yourself argue?

Oh please. If you don't want to get flack from people then don't post. If you want to debate then fine but if every argument or debate has to resort to this then zip it.

It doesn't matter if it's 1.2 million, 600,000 or a trillion.... too many have died for something that should have never occured.... is it too complicated for you to figure out?

Well if that is your point why even bring the numbers game into it?

Oh but I guess since the numbers can't be verified to an exact number (Because you guys never bothered to "Keep body counts" cuz it's not good for propaganda) it must be zero and everybody is just fine, is that it?

We don't bother to keep body counts because as we found out they are irrelevant and give propaganda to the other side.

Obviously it's not, so what's the point of arguing the numbers when the numbers don't actually matter and they wern't the point in the first place?

Oh that's right, to avoid dealing with the actual known truth. :roll:

Who brought the numbers up?

Truth or opinion?


Do you think it's fabrication, bias or fantasy to trivialize and act like nothing is wrong?

Of course something is wrong...we're in a war.

Cuz that's all you have been doing so far in this thread. You don't want to face that there might actually be something wrong and that it might be wise to try and make things somewhat better..... you just want to argue irrelevent numbers to continue to argue there's nothing wrong.... or that your country has a big part in what is wrong.

Geez...that numbers thing got to you.

No Prax...the US wants this war to go on and on and we want to kill a trillion...mostly women and children first. Feel better?


Typical response..... oh and since all of my arguments about your piss poor education in your country have been focused on your elementary and high schools, not your universities, you're still wrong.

Thanks for playing.

Typical response...was it? You expected that? Doubtful.

Oh so our mostly liberal secondary education system is top notch because they tend to lean towards your thinking. However eveyone of those kids including the proffesors came from our primary education system and suddenly got smart.



You have to have a point first before you can prove it.

Point was proven. You just don't like it.


I'm sure you will.

I would have if you didn't add that anything I send you will disagree with.


Yup.... continue to prove my point as always... you get a little challenge so you don't bother, and yet expect others to swallow your tripe without evidence..... nice game you play, but I don't buy it.

Why bother if you...before I even get the info...are saying you will disagree with whatever I get? I would have bothered but you dismissed the opposing view before being presented with what I was going to send.

Now THAT is typical of you is it not? Have you EVER been swayed in this forum with regards to your opinions on the US?


And what does that have to do with your illegal invasion?

Your opinion...we think different. It is no different than your illegal invasion of Yugoslavia.

Oh yeah, it doesn't. And nobody said he was obsolved of his crimes or that any of his crimes didn't matter..... they pale in comparison to what your country did to Iraq and the ends that have yet to be seen still don't justify your means, no matter how long you guys plan on hanging around there to get blown up.

Saddams crimes pale in comparison?! :lol:
 

Zzarchov

House Member
Aug 28, 2006
4,600
100
63
Actually he's right eaglesmack, in a very important way, facts are almost never facts.

They are a collection of evidence that lends more weight to one viewpoint than another (sometimes monstrously vast weight), but you never can rule out the possibility its wrong. The term reasonable doubt is used for a reason in law.

But for every day common use, excluding philosophy in favour of pragmatism..

yes a fact is a fact is a fact.
 

Praxius

Mass'Debater
Dec 18, 2007
10,677
161
63
Halifax, NS & Melbourne, VIC
Facts are never facts? Good one.

That's your exact mentality you are expressing, it is not I doing the good one on this..... that's your basic excuse as to why you have yet to provide any shred of information to counter anything presented thus far in this thread..... much like many of the other threads in the past.

Oh please. If you don't want to get flack from people then don't post. If you want to debate then fine but if every argument or debate has to resort to this then zip it.

Please indeed..... if you want to actually look like you're doing any form of debate, then back up what you claim... I have done so and more.... I have yet to see you supply on shred of information of evidence for anything you argue for/against.... oh that's right, because you always have an excuse to not supply anything..... probably because you don't have a damn thing to back anything up in the first place.

And what you're giving in this thread isn't anything close to flack but simple straw grasping with nothing to back it up.

After so long when only one person is putting effort into a debate while the other just sits there and doesn't do anything but shout comments from the peanut gallery, it's not a debate, it's just a joke.

Well if that is your point why even bring the numbers game into it?

Um... gee.... to back up the main claims I was focusing on in order to prove the point that what I am stating is overall true.... so I don't sound like you.

We don't bother to keep body counts because as we found out they are irrelevant and give propaganda to the other side.

Exactly. You don't want to keep body counts and be responsible for your actions because it's not good for business and to keep people thinking the war is doing something good..... it's to avoid the actual truth, and when the truth finally comes out, you can attempt to dispute it because you didn't keep records in the first place.

And if you think civilians and thousands of others who have died because of your actions are irrelevent, then that also just confirms more of what I have been saying.

Who brought the numbers up?

Who asked for them?

Truth or opinion?

Opinion based on Truth.

Of course something is wrong...we're in a war.

And who's fault is that?

Geez...that numbers thing got to you.

No Prax...the US wants this war to go on and on and we want to kill a trillion...mostly women and children first. Feel better?

My feelings are irrelevent, but what you explain follows directly along with your nation's current actions, so what is everybody else to believe?

Typical response...was it? You expected that? Doubtful.

Doubt it all you want, it was predictable. I have been shatting all over the education system in the US, Bush's No Child Left Behind BS, the lack of funding, and everything else that has been focused mostly in the elementary/high schools of the US. It was only a matter of time before you attempted to generalize my past comments and try to use them against the above example of a university study done in the US, which had no relation whatsoever to any of my past comments, that I purposely left out my previous comment I was going to add to correct you before you even began.... but I figured I'd just see if you would... and you did.

And now you doubt that I could predict that? Typical Repetitive Responses in past encounters made the prediction quite easy I must say.

Oh so our mostly liberal secondary education system is top notch because they tend to lean towards your thinking. However eveyone of those kids including the proffesors came from our primary education system and suddenly got smart.

That just shows your own education level, as you should have been aware that every year that goes by, more and more forign students are filling in the empty spaces of your universities because in recent years, students have been dropping out, failing their grades and pretty well.... left behind in the last 8 or so years in high school.

And I never said your schools were so dumbed down for decades.... just recently the plans put in place made schools either force people out of school, failed them out of school, or otherwise drop expectations to 0.1 in order to pass more people in the class, thereby getting more funding.... this has just been recent trends in the US, not forever.

You guys were smart, but things are going down hill now.... and it's because of people like Bush who have squandered your education system down the drain. The Universities are not as hard hit, because they're not in the same system and get their money directly from the students coming in.

So once again.... predictable..... and your assumption was still wrong.

Point was proven. You just don't like it.

Um.... no.... you haven't made any point yet, except to argue any commonly accepted information predented to you. You have yet to explain anything worthwhile, let alone to back it up with anything other then your own assumptions.... you haven't even bothered to supply any practical information to refute the existing arguments and information.

So once again, no you haven't proven anything and you haven't presented any point thus far.

I would have if you didn't add that anything I send you will disagree with.

You should read a bit slower.... I said I could hypothetically disagree with anything you say, just as you are doing right now..... but that doesn't mean I will just out of spite. I'm not as stone headed as many may think and many times in the past I have changed my positions and opinions when presented with new, more logical information.

But if you provide nothing, then you get nothing.

Why bother if you...before I even get the info...are saying you will disagree with whatever I get? I would have bothered but you dismissed the opposing view before being presented with what I was going to send.

:roll:

My original response was from when you said this after I actually provided requested information:

"But Prax...those high numbers have been disputed over and over. Some numbers have an extreme percentage of the population killed! Iraqi Bodycount website is a fabricated site with made up numbers to suit THEIR agenda as well. Their agenda is your agenda so you buy into it."

which I responded with:

"Then again, if you have anything valid in regards to counter reports on the numbers and deaths, by all means, provide them to refute these reports.

Then again, anything you provide, I guess (hypothetically) all I have to do is say those sites are biased as well and not reliable.... so it goes both ways in that regard."

^ Notice the both ways? You just brushed off all information I provided as being some form of propaganda that I would simply believe in because it suits what I want apparently by your words..... I then replied with a counter argument showing how stupid that mentality is, because it stops a debate from even progressing because you refuse to face any challenges.

I could brush off any information you provide in the exact same manner as you did to myself..... but I won't, because I am not like you.

So by all means..... provide some of that fancy information you were going to provide before you got scared off.

Now THAT is typical of you is it not? Have you EVER been swayed in this forum with regards to your opinions on the US?

Not until your country's actions match your country's words I won't. I'll point out good things when they come along and agree with some laws, or principles within your nation and way of life, and I will also disagree..... but unless some logical information comes along that makes more sense then what I already believe in, then that's a hard thing to do.

By all means, explain why you guys felt you had a right to cross into yet another country and attack their people? Explain to me what changes or corrections have been made once you guys figured that you're killing too many civilians? Anything? Nothing? Any information to show that you guys actually give a damn?

Is there any evidence that the US actually cares and is trying its best to not harm or kill innocent people?

Is there any evidence that the US respects international laws and borders of sovereign nations?

In any other nation, if they were seeing this much death at their hands, they would be quickly changing tactics or making complete overhauls on their procedures.... either that or they simply don't think they are doing anything wrong and simply will continue doing what they are doing. Which is it?

Your opinion...we think different. It is no different than your illegal invasion of Yugoslavia.

Don't blame Canada, blame NATO.... just as you can blame NATO for why our asses are doing the exact same damn thing in Afghanistan today... if we wern't part of NATO and our leaders actually grew a pair of balls to think for themselves, we wouldn't have been in Yugoslavia or Afghanistan in the first damn place.

But once again, who got the balls rolling? Who's been leading those conflicts? Hmmm..... looking into much of the information, apparently the US had plenty of aircraft doing a good amount of bomb dropping and had a lot of involvement in the conflict as well.... the only difference is that we're open to our involvement, put it under investigation, face our actions, punish those responsible and learn from our past mistakes....

what have you guys done?

Saddams crimes pale in comparison?! :lol:

Yes they do.
 

Zzarchov

House Member
Aug 28, 2006
4,600
100
63
I can explain why the border was crossed Prax, its been pointed out.

People were crossing from Syria to Iraq to kill people. You can either sit there and take it, or follow them accross the border.

If the border doesn't matter to the people you chase down, why should it matter to you?
 

Praxius

Mass'Debater
Dec 18, 2007
10,677
161
63
Halifax, NS & Melbourne, VIC
I can explain why the border was crossed Prax, its been pointed out.

People were crossing from Syria to Iraq to kill people. You can either sit there and take it, or follow them accross the border.

If the border doesn't matter to the people you chase down, why should it matter to you?

And as already explained, if you got a target of someone you want stopped in another country such as Syria, you ask that country to take care of it.

And then this is where you say that Syria hasn't been doing anything about it so the US had to take their own actions.

Then this is where I supply the same information I already supplied showing that Syria has been stepping up their operations to control these cross border raids and they have already clearly stated that if the US wanted someone in paticular they should have contacted them to get them.

And then this is where we get back into another two pages of recycled arguments to avoid that there isn't a real counter argument in the first place and somehow they had no choice but to cross into their borders and kill a family of farmers.... or alleged "Terrorists" as the US has claimed.... but I guess we'll never know since they're dead and can't be put to the courts.

Yes yes.... we've all been down this road two or three times now.

I have yet to see any logical justification.

And then this is where you say that they had to cross the border and attack because they were being attacked and Syria wasn't doing anything about it...... See the cycle yet?
 

Zzarchov

House Member
Aug 28, 2006
4,600
100
63
oh, ask the country to take care of it?

Naive much? If Syria is sending the guys, why on earth would they stop them?

But the problem is solved, just ask the US to stop sending people into Syria then and whipe your hands clean. Apparently people stop shooting at you if you simply ask them not too.

Do you know why India keeps firing into Pakistan? Because Pakistan keeps either sending, or allowing militants into India.

The world has ruled again and again that if you don't control your borders someone else will, and that was decided long before this became an Issue with American forces.

The rules were good enough before America invoked them, they are good enough now.
 
  • Like
Reactions: EagleSmack

Praxius

Mass'Debater
Dec 18, 2007
10,677
161
63
Halifax, NS & Melbourne, VIC
oh, ask the country to take care of it?

Naive much? If Syria is sending the guys, why on earth would they stop them?

Oh fa geezz..... come on, stop being so damn thick headed..... we already talked about this as well.

To Repeat, yet again, Syria is not sending it's own forces, let alone condonning those who do cross the borders and giving them their best wishes.

I suppose you think that Mexico is actually sending people accross the US borders for some agenda as well? I suppose you think it's actually the Pakistan Military coming accross the Afghan border and shooting at us? Face it, things happen outside of a country's control.

If I hypothetically started my own military organization inside Canada to go and blow the hell out of Greenland, by your own logic, our Government would be behind it even if they were trying to control and rid my organization? :roll:

But the problem is solved, just ask the US to stop sending people into Syria then and whipe your hands clean. Apparently people stop shooting at you if you simply ask them not too.

This garbage response does nothing for the debate as it relates to nothing that was said.... continue to try and twist the debate to some other tangent all you want, you're not going to confuse me on what is being talked about.

You want a real solution? Either the US pullout of the middle east as Iraq and just about every other nation wants so that some form of order can be put back in, or the US stop striking other nations they are not at war with and continue to seek these people out through the processes every nation should follow..... or the US continues it's disregard and thereby our and every other nation who should reject these actions, act and begin to cut support to the US until they do, just as the US tries to bind those nations that don't do as they want.

If you want to debate actual problems and find actual solutions, then stop wasting time with dumbass responses like simply asking and expecting something would be done.

Do you know why India keeps firing into Pakistan? Because Pakistan keeps either sending, or allowing militants into India.

I never said that was right either..... nor did I ever say it was right for Israel to bomb the hell out of its neighbors..... it does nothing to solve the situation and it will just continue to happen.

The world has ruled again and again that if you don't control your borders someone else will, and that was decided long before this became an Issue with American forces.

The rules were good enough before America invoked them, they are good enough now.

So since the US can't keep the borders of Iraq stable, and Turkey is now crossing into Iraq and blowing the snot out of everybody, does that mean that perhaps Turkey, Iran or Syria should invade Iraq because the US can't do the job themselves in order to keep themselves secure?

I guess you don't see the big mess that can arise from this situation.

Oh, and besides the fact that Iraq's constitution dictates that the US can not use their land/nation to operate cross border attacks on its neighbors..... yeah.... when you bend the rules for some, expect everybody to take a shot at bending the rules before there is nothing but chaos.

I find it very funny when I see comments from other leaders of nations who look towards the US to keep order and stability on the planet, when they directly break just about every rule and diplomatic approach possible with no ligit explination.

Lead by example I guess.
 

Risus

Genius
May 24, 2006
5,373
25
38
Toronto
oh, ask the country to take care of it?

Naive much? If Syria is sending the guys, why on earth would they stop them?

But the problem is solved, just ask the US to stop sending people into Syria then and whipe your hands clean. Apparently people stop shooting at you if you simply ask them not too.

Do you know why India keeps firing into Pakistan? Because Pakistan keeps either sending, or allowing militants into India.

The world has ruled again and again that if you don't control your borders someone else will, and that was decided long before this became an Issue with American forces.

The rules were good enough before America invoked them, they are good enough now.

Its just some place else the yankees can stick their noses....
 

Zzarchov

House Member
Aug 28, 2006
4,600
100
63
Oh fa geezz..... come on, stop being so damn thick headed..... we already talked about this as well.

To Repeat, yet again, Syria is not sending it's own forces, let alone condonning those who do cross the borders and giving them their best wishes.
.
Thick-headed time on your part again?

Because they don't wear a Syrian Army uniform, nor are receiving official support you think they aren't Syrian?

Oh good news then. America should just use CIA strike teams more then. As then by your definition its not doing anything wrong. They aren't officially US forces and they aren't condonning them in any verifiable way, hell many of them would even by arrested in the US if the wrong people found out about them.

Seriously Prax, I know its hard to believe, but other groups of people in the world do bad things too, even brutal dictators that torture their own citizens, occupy foreign nations and assasinate oppositions leaders. Thats 1/3rd worse than America even!


So since the US can't keep the borders of Iraq stable, and Turkey is now crossing into Iraq and blowing the snot out of everybody, does that mean that perhaps Turkey, Iran or Syria should invade Iraq because the US can't do the job themselves in order to keep themselves secure?

Sure, if American forces are crossing the border go to it. America didn't strike a Syrian Army Base or Government HQ, it just went after the people directly attacking US forces in light of the Syrians refusal or inability to exert sovereignty.

But Turkey DOES strike into Northern Iraq and both Syria and Iran would be more than elligable to strike into Iraq at direct assailants if Iraq could not maintain its own borders.

As I said, this isn't a ruling made special for America, this has been the norm for decades and America is invoking it for the same reason everyone else does.