supporting our troops??

Jay

Executive Branch Member
Jan 7, 2005
8,366
3
38
Re: RE: supporting our troops

aeon said:
Mogz said:
Eh, it's kind of like the cortez/beaver thing for me. I generally just skim their posts, but every now and then I feel the need to comment, just to keep myself fresh in their minds. Helps them learn who their betters are ;)

Cue the retaliatory posts.


You havent skim anything at all with me, kind of guy like you and ITN, are just too easy to put down, you guys have absotly no opinion on nothing, u just repeat what the media told you.

It's better than just making it up like you guys do.
 

I think not

Hall of Fame Member
Apr 12, 2005
10,506
33
48
The Evil Empire
Re: RE: supporting our troops

aeon said:
You havent skim anything at all with me, kind of guy like you and ITN, are just too easy to put down, you guys have absotly no opinion on nothing, u just repeat what the media told you.

This from a person that sees conspiracies around every corner. :roll:
 

aeon

Council Member
Jan 17, 2006
1,348
0
36
Re: RE: supporting our troops

Jay said:
aeon said:
Mogz said:
Eh, it's kind of like the cortez/beaver thing for me. I generally just skim their posts, but every now and then I feel the need to comment, just to keep myself fresh in their minds. Helps them learn who their betters are ;)

Cue the retaliatory posts.


You havent skim anything at all with me, kind of guy like you and ITN, are just too easy to put down, you guys have absotly no opinion on nothing, u just repeat what the media told you.

It's better than just making it up like you guys do.


Point out where i make up stories or facts, good luck!
 

aeon

Council Member
Jan 17, 2006
1,348
0
36
Re: RE: supporting our troops

I think not said:
aeon said:
You havent skim anything at all with me, kind of guy like you and ITN, are just too easy to put down, you guys have absotly no opinion on nothing, u just repeat what the media told you.

This from a person that sees conspiracies around every corner. :roll:


Which conspiracies??
 

Jay

Executive Branch Member
Jan 7, 2005
8,366
3
38
Re: RE: supporting our troops

aeon said:
Jay said:
aeon said:
Mogz said:
Eh, it's kind of like the cortez/beaver thing for me. I generally just skim their posts, but every now and then I feel the need to comment, just to keep myself fresh in their minds. Helps them learn who their betters are ;)

Cue the retaliatory posts.


You havent skim anything at all with me, kind of guy like you and ITN, are just too easy to put down, you guys have absotly no opinion on nothing, u just repeat what the media told you.

It's better than just making it up like you guys do.




Point out where i make up stories or facts, good luck!

How about the part where you said GWB orchastrated 911.
 

aeon

Council Member
Jan 17, 2006
1,348
0
36
Re: RE: supporting our troops

Jay said:
How about the part where you said GWB orchastrated 911.


I didnt make that up,since there is no evidence that alquada was behind 9-11, since all the terrorist attack made by alquada are simple(blowing bus, bars, train),since the bush administration obstruct independant comission to be formed, since it took them 432 days to get a bi-partisan comission on 9-11, since they covered up, and distorted evidence regarding 9-11, since they needed 9-11(according to the PNAC web site) to get their agenda going ( military mobilization in middle east- growing military budget- ressource in middle east), the only left that makes sense, is that 9-11 was an inside job.
 

Mogz

Council Member
Jan 26, 2006
1,254
1
38
Edmonton
1. Learn to spell; it's AL-QAEDA. Do you honestly expect us to take you seriously if you can't even spell the subject at hand?

2.
I didnt make that up,since there is no evidence that alquada was behind 9-11, since all the terrorist attack made by alquada are simple(blowing bus, bars, train),

The hell? All hijackers were confirmed members of Al-qaeda. They were traced back to an Al-qaeda staging house in Germany. What more do you want? Urine smaples?

Simple attacks? So what? We automatically dismiss Al-qaeda as they've never committed a large act before? That's tantamount to saying that "Mr. Bloggins never murdered anyone in his life before, so there is no way he could have murdered his ex-wife".

3. Inside job? To what avail? Their economy crashed post 9-11. They hurt the air industry, not to mention the U.S. tourism industry. 9-11 hurt the U.S. more than it could have ever helped them.
 

aeon

Council Member
Jan 17, 2006
1,348
0
36
Re: RE: supporting our troops??

Mogz said:
1. Learn to spell; it's AL-QAEDA. Do you honestly expect us to take you seriously if you can't even spell the subject at hand?

We in quebec(french peoples in case you don t know) spell al quada like this.


Mogz said:
2.
The hell? All hijackers were confirmed members of Al-qaeda. They were traced back to an Al-qaeda staging house in Germany. What more do you want? Urine smaples?

That doesnt change anything, 5 hijacker were alive and well after the event, and no one at the white house cared about it, and never mention mention anything on it, same for the 9-11 comission.

The white house came on the 17th of september( cond rice) and said, we will bring evidence of alquada in due time, and never came back with anything at all.But even less than 2 days after the attack, we all knew the faces of 19 hijackers. how come??

Then we all saw the non-sense(lies) sorrounding iraq, and at the same time, alquada was suddenly replace by saddam hussein.



Mogz said:
Simple attacks? So what? We automatically dismiss Al-qaeda as they've never committed a large act before? That's tantamount to saying that "Mr. Bloggins never murdered anyone in his life before, so there is no way he could have murdered his ex-wife".

Do you think there is a difference beetween stealing a sophisticated bank, and a convience store??

Which one do you think needs more preparations??

Mogz said:
3. Inside job? To what avail? Their economy crashed post 9-11. They hurt the air industry, not to mention the U.S. tourism industry. 9-11 hurt the U.S. more than it could have ever helped them.

Their economy would have been worst withouth going to iraq, a letter from the PNAC( most of the bush administration today) was written to bill clinton in 1998, saying iraq was the best alternative for the american economy, signed by Richard perle, donald rumsfeld, jeb bush and dick cheeney.
 

I think not

Hall of Fame Member
Apr 12, 2005
10,506
33
48
The Evil Empire
Mogz

We've been down this road with aeon before, he can get hit in the head with 40,000 pounds of documents showing him how, what and why and he will still believe what he wants to believe.
 

elevennevele

Electoral Member
Mar 13, 2006
787
11
18
Canada
RE: supporting our troops

It depends on who gets hurt and who gets helped. Oil company's have scored the highest profits ever on skyrocketing prices due to the uncertainties with oil rich countries. Defense contractors/suppliers, Cheney's friends at Haliburton, etc. have all benefited tremendously. People who ironically seem to travel within Bush’s social circle.

War profiteering is out of control.

It can also be argued that 911 profoundly helped Bush's presidency and his ability to pass his agenda for the country up until now.
 

Jay

Executive Branch Member
Jan 7, 2005
8,366
3
38
I've already explained it's about the sheep....why doesn't anyone listen to me?
 

aeon

Council Member
Jan 17, 2006
1,348
0
36
I think not said:
Mogz

We've been down this road with aeon before, he can get hit in the head with 40,000 pounds of documents showing him how, what and why and he will still believe what he wants to believe.


And strangely , you never show anything at all to prove that i am wrong, just never.
 

I think not

Hall of Fame Member
Apr 12, 2005
10,506
33
48
The Evil Empire
aeon said:
I think not said:
Mogz

We've been down this road with aeon before, he can get hit in the head with 40,000 pounds of documents showing him how, what and why and he will still believe what he wants to believe.


And strangely , you never show anything at all to prove that i am wrong, just never.

I've tried the common sense route, I've tried the scientific route and I have tried the process of elimination route, and all you ever come back with are links to $12 websites. And then you claim everybody else except you listens to the media and we are told what to think. Do a search and go find what I posted, all you ever do is engage in demagoguery.
 

aeon

Council Member
Jan 17, 2006
1,348
0
36
I think not said:
I've tried the common sense route, I've tried the scientific route and I have tried the process of elimination route, and all you ever come back with are links to $12 websites. And then you claim everybody else except you listens to the media and we are told what to think. Do a search and go find what I posted, all you ever do is engage in demagoguery.


Absotly not, all you did, is repeating what cnn and fox news says,i never use $12 website, when in fact you use that kind of web site to proved how evil are the muslims, get real for once.
 

I think not

Hall of Fame Member
Apr 12, 2005
10,506
33
48
The Evil Empire
aeon said:
Absotly not, all you did, is repeating what cnn and fox news says,i never use $12 website, when in fact you use that kind of web site to proved how evil are the muslims, get real for once.

I know what I did, and it has nothing to do with what you just said. For example, I give you an explanation on how steel loses 60% of its strength at 1000 degrees farenheit and then you ask me why the people several floors above the impact zone didn't burn to death. And you actually believe you're making a point. :roll:
 

aeon

Council Member
Jan 17, 2006
1,348
0
36
I think not said:
I know what I did, and it has nothing to do with what you just said. For example, I give you an explanation on how steel loses 60% of its strength at 1000 degrees farenheit and then you ask me why the people several floors above the impact zone didn't burn to death. And you actually believe you're making a point. :roll:

What you just said was explained in fox, cnn, msnbc,cbs, and so on.

Steel lose 60% of his streng at 1000degree farenheit, but the problem it never reach 1000 degree, otherwise people wouldnt have survived in the building near the impact, secondly, the impact was in the top of the building, the collapse last 10 sec each tower, at the same speed of a free falling object, suggesting there was explosive that was planted strategically, police reports, firefighters witnesses, wtc employes statement , and seismic records from columbia university support the fact that the world trade center were brought down by explosives..
 

Mogz

Council Member
Jan 26, 2006
1,254
1
38
Edmonton
ITN, I just read his posts and chuckle. Then I picture him sitting in his parents basement building himself a tinfoil crown to keep the "spy waves" out. Did you know that in the middle ages, "idiots" of the era were used as a source of entertainment. They'd just let them wander around a market square and jabber to themselves to make the common folk laugh. I've taken to seeing aeon as our slobbering fool. Sure it's all text, but if you use your creative noddle you can have a laugh every now and then. Try it some time :)