A very long but interesting read about  Rcmp    arrogance,power and corruption                                                            
Elite B.C. RCMP spy unit devastated by abuse of power      
In  June 2008, when RCMP Const. Lorraine Bergerman met her new boss,  Staff-Sgt. Travis Pearson, she found his first words strange and  troubling. 
Pearson — a fast-rising, 38-year-old officer candidate  and former professional standards investigator — had just taken over  the elite RCMP surveillance unit known as Special O.
In one of the  unit’s secret Lower Mainland offices, he approached Bergerman, a key  administrator and a 25-year veteran, looked at her seriously and said:  “Where are all the young women?”
It would only get more bizarre.
Launched  in 1974, Special O gathered evidence on all the biggest British  Columbia cases: Robert Pickton; Surrey 6 shooting; Air India terrorists;  former premier Glen Clark, who was suspected of corruption; notorious  juror Gillian Guess; international drug cartel players. All were  targeted by Special O officers — people who don’t look or act like  regular cops, many of them lifelong unit members born with natural  talents for snooping.
Bergerman was put on her guard with Pearson  right away. But she didn’t foresee that “O” would soon degenerate into a  surreal parallel world, in which the nation’s purported top police  spies would begin spying and plotting against each other. 
And  although Bergerman and her colleagues quickly noticed that Pearson  seemed constantly to be furtively texting and dashing out of the office  without warning, they couldn’t know that two young women he ushered onto  the unit would allegedly become on-the-job sex partners who later  claimed they were compelled into relations with Pearson and sexually  assaulted. 
One thing they never could have guessed is that after  complaining to RCMP brass and citing evidence that should have raised  red flags, they would be the ones shunted from the unit while management  stood idle. They say Pearson’s leadership was upheld until August 2009,  when a bombshell allegation of rape on a subordinate officer, Const.  Susan Gastaldo, led to an investigation, a civil lawsuit from the  alleged victim and, finally, a sensational sex misconduct hearing. 
Apart  from wrongfully having sex on the job, however, Pearson has denied all  allegations. “I’m sorry for my disgraceful conduct and I will always be  sorry,” Pearson sobbed during a 30-minute statement in which he begged  forgiveness from the force and his family near the end of the misconduct  hearing.  “. . . my wife believes I should face the allegations before  the board . . . but she will stand by me for the other slander.”
The RCMP disciplinary board found that the sexual relationship with Gastaldo was consensual. 
After  considerable soul-searching, Bergerman and others came forward to The  Province, putting aside fears of RCMP management repercussions, to tell  the public their opinion that Pearson wasn’t just having sex on the job,  but was ruining careers and an elite unit with his scheming, harassment  and abuse of power. “The RCMP is still a great place to work, and I  don’t want to appear like I’m on a rant,” Bergerman said. “But what we  went through, the channels we were supposed to go through, didn’t work.  It can’t keep going on like this. I don’t want this to happen to other  units or other people.” 
‘Disgraceful conduct’
For  the past several months The Province has reported on the disciplinary  case of Const. Susan Gastaldo and Staff Sgt. Travis Pearson, who were  accused of having sex in a police car during work hours and exchanging  intimate messages while Gastaldo worked for Pearson in Special O.
In  May 2009, Gastaldo, who was suffering from an anxiety disorder and off  on sick leave, was sought out by Pearson and brought into a graduated  return to work at Special O under his guidance.
What happened next  was either a consensual affair, or exploitation of a mentally  vulnerable victim, depending on whose testimony you believe.
In  the course of the hearing, Pearson admitted to having sex with Gastaldo  in his covert SUV during work hours, but rejected a number of  allegations in the testimony of Gastaldo and one other employee. That  employee — a former subordinate of Pearson’s in the North Vancouver  detachment — has her identity protected and is referred to as D.B. 
D.B.  testified she and her family felt they were stalked, and the family is  still trying to recover from Pearson’s alleged intrusions. Like  Gastaldo, D.B. claimed she was assaulted and subjected to veiled  threats, and Pearson abused his power to ensnare her. The two women said  they feared the consequences of reporting Pearson because of his  connections with RCMP brass, and his “wingmen” — protected officers that  he seemed to gather around himself.
Gastaldo testified that  Pearson seemed to run a “snoop” network of Mounties and said he could  produce damaging information on high-level B.C. Mounties. D.B. testified  that Pearson said he would make a “shovel call” — what she believed to  be a threat of violence from one of the “wingmen” — if anyone hindered  their relationship.
During the tribunal, Pearson’s lawyer argued  the relationship between D.B. and Pearson was consensual and challenged  the accusations of stalking and implied threats. The tribunal hasn’t  made a ruling on D.B.’s claims. 
‘Little empire’
Former  Special O members told The Province that in their opinion, Pearson  played head games and used “nefarious” schemes, subtle threats, and  abused his power.
“I totally agree with [Gastaldo’s] descriptions  of intimidation and implied threats,” Const. Lynne Jarrett, a 26-year  Special O veteran, said. “I do believe it, because it happened to me.”
“People  say all Susan would have to do is speak up and tell the supervisor,  then everything would be fine,” Jarrett added. “You hear all kinds of  RCMP brass say, ‘Just speak up.’ Well, we tried two years ago, and look  what happened. We were the problem kids. We got shuffled out. That is  why we are speaking now.”
Soon after Pearson arrived at Special O,  he targeted key positions and “slowly went about” replacing experienced  members with hand-picked favourites, according to a number of Special O  members.
“He was connecting himself with people that had some  sort of character flaw,” Const. Bergerman said. It seemed like “he was  building his little empire.” 
According to testimony, one  experienced operation co-ordinator was moved from the office to the road  shift, and an officer who can only be called Cpl. P (because of a  publication ban) was installed in his place.
Gastaldo testified  that Cpl. P engaged in drunk driving and once arrived at her home in  such a vulnerable state that she allowed him to sleep off the booze in a  spare room before driving home to his family.
Sgt. J.D. Martin, referred to in testimony as Pearson’s wingman, was brought into the unit in October 2008. 
A  friend of Pearson’s from their days at the North Vancouver detachment,  Martin had left the Coquitlam detachment, where he was facing a  harassment complaint.
Martin, when confronted by The Province,  confirmed he was facing the complaint when Pearson hired him. He would  not answer what the complaint concerned, but said “it was dealt with.”
Sgt.  John Johnson, the unit leader before Pearson’s arrival, told The  Province that in Special O’s cafeteria on one occasion, Surrey Mayor  Dianne Watts appeared on TV and Martin made a crude comment, referring  to her sexual desirability.
Const. Jarrett said she spent a  significant amount of time with Martin on a training course, and he  frequently made crude remarks about women.
In testimony, Martin  said he was hired to help change the culture of Special O, and his  efforts to get the unit to shape up led to friction.
“I was eager to come over and assist in bringing about some changes in the largest covert unit in the country,” Martin said. 
Const.  Jarrett said, however, that during interviews with Special O members in  the summer of 2009, Pearson’s immediate superior, Insp. Dennis  Erickson, claimed to not know who Martin was, or why he was at Special  O.
‘Bizarre’ 
As concerns over Pearson’s staff moves  and the “bizarre” atmosphere in Special O mounted, the unit’s civilian  financial administrator, Nancy Hirschkorn, decided to take the matter to  RCMP management in Ottawa.
She compiled concerns from a number of  members and detailed Pearson’s alleged policy infractions and  immaturity, plus questionable purchases and staffing moves that  allegedly detracted from the integrity and operational ability of the  unit.
The administrator’s complaint was deferred from Ottawa back  to B.C., according to email records. And in the end, Hirschkorn was  chastised by Pearson’s supervisor, Supt. Lorne Schwartz, and told that  Pearson was doing exactly what they wanted him to do. 
At that point, many Special O members considered the once proud unit a writeoff. 
“We  were being hung out to dry because there was nowhere to go,” Const.  Jarrett said. “The atmosphere was that he could do whatever he wanted  and screw over anyone because he was invincible.”
In a list of  complaints obtained by The Province, one move that seems particularly  troubling is Pearson’s hiring of D.B. — his former subordinate and sex  partner in the North Vancouver detachment — into a high security  position for which she was neither qualified nor given sufficient  clearance, according to Special O members.
D.B. said in testimony  that she agreed to join Special O for several reasons. First, it would  increase cash-flow for her family, and she felt she couldn’t say no or  she would put her family at risk, she testified. According to D.B. the  key, though, was that one of her superiors, Staff-Sgt. Glenn Magark,  told her if she transferred to Special O, Pearson would come under  scrutiny. If Pearson was under the microscope, she said, the  relationship could be ended without her instigating the break.
Sgt. Johnson says that in his first meeting with Pearson in the summer of 2008, Pearson mentioned that he wanted to hire D.B.
“I  said, ‘You can’t pay her more than $30,000 because she is not  qualified, doesn’t have security clearance for the job you want,’”  Johnson said. “And he basically hires her contrary to policy at about  $70,000. He insisted they get a brand new Mazda SUV for her. It was  crazy.”
D.B. testified that she only worked about 11 shifts at  Special O in early 2009 before quitting, because contrary to her  expectations that she and Pearson would be working in separate  locations, he allegedly arranged an on-the-job sexual encounter in his  covert SUV.
RCMP statement
New RCMP Commissioner Bob  Paulson, who has admitted the RCMP suffers from a “culture of bullying  and a legacy of botched investigations,” was not made available for an  interview on claims in this story.
Supt. Ray Bernoties of B.C.’s  E-Division said the division couldn’t comment on specific questions,  such as whether the hiring of Sgt. J.D. Martin while he faced a  harassment complaint was authorized.
In a prepared statement,  Bernoties said “immediately upon hearing the concerns raised by members  in Special ‘O’ in April 2009, an Inspector and S/Sgt began a review …  many measures have been implemented in Special ‘O’ since the summer of  2009, including new leadership, clear mandates and ongoing reviews.”
Special  O members say a series of interviews with Insp. Dennis Erickson  actually did not start until June, when members unsuccessfully tried to  trigger a “management review.”
“Spider-man” 
Looking  back, Const. Jarrett believes her career in Special O basically ended in  her first meeting with Pearson in October 2008, when he asked for her  opinion about a pilot project aimed at shuttling young recruits into  Special O. 
Veterans, including Jarrett, were concerned the move  was just aimed at plugging vacancies to make the unit look good on  paper, while diluting the talent pool of specialized surveillance  officers. Jarrett told Pearson her concerns, and she says he took it  badly.
“He put his head down on his forearms, with this Spider-Man  toy beside him on his desk,” Jarrett says. “It felt like a child  preparing for nap time. I thought, ‘This is how my new boss is handling  my first real conversation with me.’ I think my fate was sealed, because  either you were with him or against him.”
Jarrett and Bergerman  say they eventually moved to new units after conflicts with Pearson  played out in 2009. But they often call each other and start to cry,  talking about how the unit to which they dedicated their careers has  fallen.
The two want to stress that Special O can be salvaged, and the RCMP can, too.
“It  is unfortunate it had to get to this point, but let’s try and fix this  and give people somewhere they can go to talk to people,” Jarrett said.  “I still don’t know what the attraction of management to Travis was, and  why that took precedence over the complaints.”
Outcome
In  late December a board of RCMP adjudicators rejected Gastaldo’s claims  that she was raped and coerced into an ongoing affair, allegedly due to  her fragile psychological state and Pearson’s implied threats and  extreme persistence.
The board ruled Pearson and Gastaldo were in a  consensual affair, and both guilty of disgraceful conduct. In a move  that stunned some, they said Gastaldo could be fired for slandering  Pearson — while Pearson faces only demotion. Pearson, who was removed  from leadership at Special O when Gastaldo launched a criminal complaint  against him in August 2009, will learn his fate when his hearing  resumes in February. Gastaldo is pursuing her civil claim.
scooper@theprovince.com
A LITANY OF COMPLAINTS 
This  is a look at emails and interviews that suggest senior RCMP brass were  presented with complaints regarding Staff-Sgt. Travis Pearson’s  leadership of the Special O unit. RCMP members involved say the  complaints were stifled.
EMAIL: Feb. 24, 2009, FROM: Nancy Hirschkorn, a civilian financial administrator, Special O unit
TO: Chief Supt. Marianne Ryan, of Pacific Region Change Management Team
Pearson  has inappropriately hired a municipal employee and ‘requested her to  have a new SUV and other requests inappropriate for [the position].’
Pearson  made questionable equipment expenditures and funding requests,  including asking for a new, more expensive SUV after already being given  a ‘a brand new Nissan XTerra,’ requesting $30,000 for a new gym for  Special O, buying sports equipment that never gets used.
Hirschkorn  says under Pearson’s leadership the unit “gets more bizarre every day”  and “this information can be verified by any member, except his  “buddies.’”
EMAIL: March 2, 2009
The chief  superintendent asks Hirschkorn if she wants to meet with the officer  responsible for Pearson, Supt. Lorne Schwartz. Hirschkorn says no, since  “Supt. Schwartz … is already aware of these concerns I have raised.” 
She says she wants Ryan to attend, to hear Schwartz’s answers.
EMAIL: March 3, 2009
Schwartz  writes a stern reply to Hirschkorn, establishing ground rules for a  March 23 meeting. He says he will not be put on display and does not  report to Ryan, and: “I am not aware of the concerns you have raised as  you indicate … I am open and willing to meet but I will demand the  appropriate level of respect.”
MEETING: March 23, 2009
Special O colleagues say Hirschkorn was “demoralized” and “shattered” by March 23 meeting results.
According  to former unit head Sgt. John Johnson, members were chilled after  Hirschkorn’s complaint was crushed. “She [Hirschkorn] thought she was  going over to shed light on things that would be appreciated and  investigated. But she was chastised by Lorne and basically told how dare  she even question Travis, because he was doing exactly the job Lorne  sent him to do ...”
OUTCOME: March 25, 2009
After  talking to Hirschkorn, Special O colleague Const. Lorraine Bergerman  sent an email to the chief superintendent, stating “no wonder people  don’t come forward.” The chief superintendent replied: “I can understand  why Nancy is upset, Lorne seems to have a different style of dealing  with these matters but it is his area.”