Split over Bexit....Chaos in UK.

Blackleaf

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 9, 2004
49,941
1,910
113
 

Curious Cdn

Hall of Fame Member
Feb 22, 2015
37,070
8
36
The smart ones are skidaddling. I don't blame them. Who the hell wants their names to be associated with one of the biggest stupids in British history?
 

Ocean Breeze

Hall of Fame Member
Jun 5, 2005
18,399
95
48
The smart ones are skidaddling. I don't blame them. Who the hell wants their names to be associated with one of the biggest stupids in British history?
Exactly...... Watching this chaos on BBC in the background...... hard to believe that the Brits would have allowed themselves t become so vulnerable.......... via some stupid notion.

Between the American craziness and the UK chaos........... the world is at a fragile statee.
 

White_Unifier

Senate Member
Feb 21, 2017
7,300
2
36
The smart ones are skidaddling. I don't blame them. Who the hell wants their names to be associated with one of the biggest stupids in British history?

Are you saying the Brexiteers were foolish to vote leave without any clear idea of what they were leaving for?

Naah.
 

White_Unifier

Senate Member
Feb 21, 2017
7,300
2
36
a head scratcher..

For sure!

There are many aspects of the USMCA that I dislike, but if I faced a referendum for or against the USMCA with the leave option being just that, leave, with no clear indication as to what we intended to replace it with, I'd vote to stay with the USMCA.

Canada should learn from the UK's example here. If ever Canada had such a referendum, it should never be a for or against referendum since the 'against' option will always be ambiguous. It says what we don't want but says nothing about what we want.

Any such referendum should be a for this or for that referendum, with two reasonably clear and unambiguous options.

Whoever wrote the Brexit referendum question was a total amateur.
 

Bar Sinister

Executive Branch Member
Jan 17, 2010
8,252
19
38
Edmonton
For sure!

There are many aspects of the USMCA that I dislike, but if I faced a referendum for or against the USMCA with the leave option being just that, leave, with no clear indication as to what we intended to replace it with, I'd vote to stay with the USMCA.

Canada should learn from the UK's example here. If ever Canada had such a referendum, it should never be a for or against referendum since the 'against' option will always be ambiguous. It says what we don't want but says nothing about what we want.

Any such referendum should be a for this or for that referendum, with two reasonably clear and unambiguous options.

Whoever wrote the Brexit referendum question was a total amateur.




Considering that the USMCA is little more than NAFTA rebranded I doubt any vote on it is likely.
 

White_Unifier

Senate Member
Feb 21, 2017
7,300
2
36
Considering that the USMCA is little more than NAFTA rebranded I doubt any vote on it is likely.

For the most part, you're right. I see flaws in NAFTA too for that matter, but I still wouldn't trade that in for the unknown like the Brexiteers did.
 

Dixie Cup

Senate Member
Sep 16, 2006
6,330
4,028
113
Edmonton
The question was pretty cut and dried - to stay with the EU or leave the EU. Why would anything else matter. What was wrong with the UK BEFORE it joined the EU? Why would they have to consider other countries? For what?


If I were a Brit, I would have voted leave and expect that my country would go back to the way it was. I would expect that we would do our own trade deals with whomever, get back control of our borders and ensure that our rule of law was followed. Why is everyone complicating things? But, maybe it's just me.....


JMHO
 

Hoid

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 15, 2017
20,408
4
36
USMCA is currently being reviewed and debated in the three national capitals. It is anything but a done deal, given that the national assemblies of each member state need to approve the thing.

That is the referendum: the elected representatives investigating and deciding and voting for and against all matters of public concern.

The Brexiters managed to achieve a suspension of normal procedure in order to achieve their goals.
 

Tecumsehsbones

Hall of Fame Member
Mar 18, 2013
60,387
9,547
113
Washington DC
The question was pretty cut and dried - to stay with the EU or leave the EU. Why would anything else matter. What was wrong with the UK BEFORE it joined the EU? Why would they have to consider other countries? For what?
If I were a Brit, I would have voted leave and expect that my country would go back to the way it was. I would expect that we would do our own trade deals with whomever, get back control of our borders and ensure that our rule of law was followed. Why is everyone complicating things? But, maybe it's just me.....
JMHO

Well, your ancestors were Brits, and they did vote to leave. Britain, that is.
 

White_Unifier

Senate Member
Feb 21, 2017
7,300
2
36
The question was pretty cut and dried - to stay with the EU or leave the EU. Why would anything else matter. What was wrong with the UK BEFORE it joined the EU? Why would they have to consider other countries? For what?
If I were a Brit, I would have voted leave and expect that my country would go back to the way it was. I would expect that we would do our own trade deals with whomever, get back control of our borders and ensure that our rule of law was followed. Why is everyone complicating things? But, maybe it's just me.....
JMHO

Totally ambiguous. To take an example:

Leave for the Norwegian model?

Leave for the Swiss model?

Leave for the CETA model?

Leave to return to WTO rules?

Leave for more protectionism, tariffs, and quotas and isolation?

Leave for unilateral global free trade?

These are just the ones I can come up with off the top of my head. If you read what the question options were, you'll see that the leave option gave no idea of what was to replace EU membership.
 

coldstream

on dbl secret probation
Oct 19, 2005
5,160
27
48
Chillliwack, BC
If Britain waits long enough they'll see the rest of the EU fragment around them.

It's methodically collapsing from its margins inwards. It's two most notable champions of its centre core of Germany and France are being ousted. Angela Merkel is leaving after a series of defeats for her party to the forces of nationalism and populism. Emmanuel Macron's popularity, who sold himself as a revitalizer of the EU, has fallen to an unprecedented 29%. Italy, Poland, Hungary, Portugal, Greece are charting independent, post EU, paths

Britain would be well advised to prepare itself for an EU that forms little but security superstructure made up of sovereign and independent nation states. It'll likely happen within a decade.
 

coldstream

on dbl secret probation
Oct 19, 2005
5,160
27
48
Chillliwack, BC


Maybe this will lead to the reunification of Ireland. Seems the logical outcome since religion seems no longer to be the decisive dividing factor. The Republic of Ireland has repudiated its Catholic character with its legalization of abortion and, homosexual 'marriage' and, election of an openly homosexual Prime Minister. The whole place has gone to hell so what's to keep them apart now. I'm not sure Northern Ireland is a viable state outside Britain.
 

Tecumsehsbones

Hall of Fame Member
Mar 18, 2013
60,387
9,547
113
Washington DC
Maybe this will lead to the reunification of Ireland. Seems the logical outcome since religion seems no longer to be the decisive dividing factor. The Republic of Ireland has repudiated its Catholic character with its legalization of abortion and, homosexual 'marriage' and, election of an openly homosexual Prime Minister. The whole place has gone to hell so what's to keep them apart now. I'm not sure Northern Ireland is a viable state outside Britain.
You'd prefer poverty, starvation, and a nice flock of young victims for the priests?