The good die young, that's gods way, every body knows that. The better you are the faster you're outta here and the less taxes you have to pay.
Should Governments rescind the noble lie of religions?
- Thread starter French Patriot
- Start date
It's about time some of us did.... religions had their centuries free to do so, maybe it's Atheist's turn to see if they can do better ;-)
But I do love it how Atheists are expected to remain silent about any wrong doings they may see, thus allowing those wrong doings to continue.
I mean, how dare they, right?
Ah, you mistake what I complain about atheists in regards to, with disagreeing with their right to speak. everyone has a right to belief, everyone has a right to speak. But, Christian, atheist, muslim alike, I will point out when people are being hypocritical, or crossing the line into trying to force their views on others.
The problem with that is they let govt off the hook. Volunteer work is work, they ought to get paid. "Charities" in Canada not like they used to be, they are big biz, so treat them like a biz to cut down on corruption. Too many high salaries and nice offices, end the corporate welfare here.
Only when we completely stop funding abortion.
That's a scary concept that our rights are man-given. That only means they can be taken away by man. Communist, and if I were to be unabated, Communist-atheist countries come to mind, China, North Korea, Soviet Union, etc.
Can you please provide evidence or proof that God's existence is a lie?
But, but, that would leave less money for charity, food banks, clothing bins, orphans etc.
The God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob.
No, no, no, this is all wrong. An imaginary thing can't give you a new heart, with new desires, inward peace, and hope for the future. Don't be silly.
Um, no again. It's actually God who created free will and bestowed it to us, so all though approximately 2000 false religions are capable of doing wrong by lying, we also have the ability to spread the Truth, which is salvation through Jesus Christ. Amen! (Governments don't bestow rights, they're only suppose to serve to protect them.)
If you object to the things God has done, then please tell me on what objective standard you base your moral objection on. Remember, if you tell me your standard is "What I think" or "How I feel" that would be your opinion only and not an objective standard. (Opinion counts for jack.)
Regards,
IBM
Actually, the problem is if the government of Quebeque can take the truth and rescind homo-bishops nailing choir boys choking them secret upon threat of hell in the middle of Harper getting his nuts kicked off if more than 50% of Canadians can have intelligence enouch to read Wiki for 20 minutes to see who to vote for.
Pretend there's an interstellar spaceship design like what's-is-place in Montreal could come up with.
Pretend I'm so idealistic that Americans dream about having fathers of confederations like me.
Explain to me how you could be so ****-holew thinking honour could be achieved by jerking off as low as Chicago with your sponsorship scandal.
Time to get over it.. You Franko's were that cause of it, and your heart is broken as we discover the last remanent descendent of the French crown to do a political mating with ... I am told the Queen will offer damn-near anything to shut you up, up to and including finding some dumb-stupid French-Quibequopis bitch to ring her up, take some egg cells, and establish a Canadian monarchy able to hold to to position enough to stop TO types trying to be NY to become theior onn sort of newley depressing king as if we had not seen that already before.
Last edited:
Yes, that's exactly what it means, which demonstrates that they're man-given. Look around the world at all the places where basic human rights are denied to people, and ask yourself who did that. You might be able to make the case that some deity defines what they are, though I think that'd be fairly easy to knock down just by pointing at rights we have that are mentioned nowhere in any religious writings, like voting, but who gets them and who doesn't depends on human decisions.
So, basically, you have one group that believes that they know THE TRUTH, and based on that knowledge, they would be doing the rest of the populous a favour by forcing them to believe the same things that they do.
I wonder if that's ever been tried before.
I wonder if that's ever been tried before.
Check post 13
The right to belief translates into the right to the actions you see there.
Institutionalized abuse.
Regards
DL
Correct. Yours proves it.
TED Blog | The real difference between liberals and conservatives: Jonathan Haidt on TED.com
Regards
DL
Yes. You describe all religions.
Regards
DL