The entire purpose of this reactionary material was to inflame the passions of the younger members against their elders in a diabolical plan to split the demographic continuity of this great nation. People under forty use more air, water, food and space. They should be taxed accordingly. Being active should carry a heavier associated cost. Certainly cost of living could prevent this problem by helping to ensure fewer old people in the future by applying strict controls on the under forty dumb twots.
I agree with you here, DB. Except I see a possible problem with
"Being active should carry a heavier associated cost."
I see the obese population using this as a means of those active and healthy paying the obese persons way...There may need to be clarification to this.