Self Defence in Canada?

Ron in Regina

"Voice of the West" Party
Apr 9, 2008
29,562
11,096
113
Regina, Saskatchewan
This one’s gonna become political, so I might as well start a thread for it right here.
1756514856553.jpeg
There is outrage in parts of Ontario, after police in Lindsay laid charges against a homeowner after a break and enter on Monday morning. As Megan King reports, the incident is renewing conversations around self-defence laws in Canada.
There’s a mish-mash of information surrounding this in Canada, much of it conflicting, not just my opinion, but how the law is applied regarding this topic.

A case in Lindsay, Ontario is raising questions about the limits of self-defense. A man is facing charges after allegedly assaulting an intruder in his apartment with a knife, leaving the intruder in life-threatening condition. Legal analyst Lorne Honickman joins Candace Daniel to break down the case.
A court document shows a Lindsay, Ont., man facing charges for allegedly breaking into an apartment was carrying a crossbow when he was confronted by a tenant.
(YouTube & Alleged intruder at centre of Ont. self-defence case was armed with a crossbow, court documents show)

The resident, Jeremy David McDonald, is also facing assault charges in the incident on Aug. 18 — a fact that has generated widespread interest in the case.

Police information filed in court alleges that Michael Kyle Breen damaged a window and screen at McDonald’s home and carried a crossbow.

The court document states that the 41-year-old Breen is charged with break and enter, possession of a weapon for a dangerous purpose, mischief under $5,000, and failing to comply with a probation order.

Police have said that Breen, who is scheduled to appear in court for a bail hearing next week, was already wanted for unrelated offences.

McDonald, the 44-year-old resident, was charged with aggravated assault and assault with a weapon after he allegedly “did endanger the life” of Breen.
(YouTube & Lindsay, Ont., home intruder had crossbow, was on probation: court docs | Hanomansing Tonight)

So, what now?
 

Ron in Regina

"Voice of the West" Party
Apr 9, 2008
29,562
11,096
113
Regina, Saskatchewan
The B&E was light. Classically, that's burglary, which is "breaking and entering a building with the intent of committing a felony therein." It's a felony, where B&E is usually a misdemeanor.
I don’t have little kids anymore, but I do have grandkids. Apparently the dude who was the tenant has an apartment that’s on top of other businesses the way that that building is set up.

From what I heard a couple days ago, the guy who broke in, climbed up a fire escape, then broken into the suite through a window window, which turns out to be the window into this guy’s daughter’s room. The daughter wasn’t home, but the guy who came in was carrying a crossbow.

Some kind of confrontation occurred. The tenant had a knife vs the guy breaking in with his crossbow. Both ended up charged.

Admittedly, I know very little beyond this at this point, but if you’re (someone is) breaking into somebody’s home with a weapon in the middle of the night (it was 2 or 3 am, or something like that), chances are you’re not up to any good.

There’s so much conflicting information with respect to self-defence up here, where you’re only supposed to use the force of a reasonable man, and only matching force (you’re not supposed to bring a gun to a knife fight sort of thing), and so on and so forth….

Then the way the law is applied is done with huge variances, & much discretion by law enforcement most of the time with most of the firsthand stories that I’m told.

My neighbour took a knife away from some guy in a Tim Hortons a couple of weeks ago (the guy was threatening staff and customers), then fired him through the front doors out into the parking lot. He (my neighbour) didn’t get a legal spanking, & police told the guy that he was lucky that that’s all that happened to him. Different application of the law in different places.

(Our neighbour only damaged this guy’s arm, and it wasn’t life-threatening, and he didn’t use a weapon himself, and this all took place a block or two from the police station, for some background there)
 

Hoof Hearted

House Member
Jul 23, 2016
4,480
1,173
113
Had a Cop buddy growing up.

Told me he got a call of a guy breaking through a ground-level window. He arrived on the scene to find an old man had clocked the perp with a baseball bat...the guy lying knocked out in the window well.

My buddy told the old man, "You can't do that!" Then he dragged the perp through the old man's front door and said..."Now you're fine."
 

spaminator

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 26, 2009
39,073
3,607
113
according to the news: porcupine is campaigning on blaming the liberals for this but in actuality it was the conservatives that created and supported the punish the victim laws.
 

Tecumsehsbones

Hall of Fame Member
Mar 18, 2013
60,581
9,625
113
Washington DC
When you enter with a crossbow does that change it to a felony? It's now armed robbery.
Depends on what happened inside, if anything. Robbery is "theft by force or threat of force." We don't know from what's presented above whether the burglar managed to get a threat or demand out before the owner clocked him. But I'd say his intent to commit a felony was pretty clear.
 

Tecumsehsbones

Hall of Fame Member
Mar 18, 2013
60,581
9,625
113
Washington DC
By the way, down hereabouts at least the "breaking" in B&E is "any unauthorized action needed to gain access." People have been convicted of "breaking" that consisted of nothing but pushing open a door that was ajar.
 

Tecumsehsbones

Hall of Fame Member
Mar 18, 2013
60,581
9,625
113
Washington DC
Also, generally, self-defence is a common-law concept that has been codified or not in various jurisdictions. Blackstone wrote "self-defence is a right that predates all positive law." The standard is that the accused must have reasonably believed that he was under a threat of imminent bodily harm. If the accused reasonably believed she was under threat of "grievous bodily harm or death," deadly force in self-defence is authorized.

The "castle doctrine" states that if someone is in your home, that person can be presumed to be threatening grievous bodily harm or death. It's more for authorizing deadly force than for simply authorizing self-defence.

Be interesting to see how this plays out.
 

Tecumsehsbones

Hall of Fame Member
Mar 18, 2013
60,581
9,625
113
Washington DC
Aaaand a caveat. . . I'm going with the English common law on this. Various jurisdictions with English common law-derived legal systems have, by legislation or precedents in their own courts, modified the doctrines in various ways.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ron in Regina

Ron in Regina

"Voice of the West" Party
Apr 9, 2008
29,562
11,096
113
Regina, Saskatchewan
Well, Lord only knows how long this will take to play out, and there’s gonna be politicians jumping on the bandwagon and media attention so if this goes to a jury situation, finding an unbiassed selection might be difficult with today’s 24 hour new cycle.
Be interesting to see how this plays out.
We might have to circle back to this thread in about a year or so. The key names for a Google search at that point so far would probably be:
1) Jeremy David McDonald
2) Michael Kyle Breen
3) the term, “Lindsay Ontario Self Defence”

Apparently, these guys lived in the same neighbourhood, & maybe even on the same street, and that may or may not be relevant. The coming through a window in a child’s bedroom at 3am with a crossbow seems somewhat problematic to explain rationally at this point but who knows? Was a knife a reasonable defence against a crossbow? It’ll be interesting.

Why would the police release the information that Mr. McDonald attacked Mr. Breen with a knife to the media, but only after the first court appearance, would it be made known that Mr. Breen had a crossbow? That seemed kind of odd unto itself, but maybe there’s a justifiable reason for that also?
 

Tecumsehsbones

Hall of Fame Member
Mar 18, 2013
60,581
9,625
113
Washington DC
Well, Lord only knows how long this will take to play out, and there’s gonna be politicians jumping on the bandwagon and media attention so if this goes to a jury situation, finding an unbiassed selection might be difficult with today’s 24 hour new cycle.

We might have to circle back to this thread in about a year or so. The key names for a Google search at that point so far would probably be:
1) Jeremy David McDonald
2) Michael Kyle Breen
3) the term, “Lindsay Ontario Self Defence”

Apparently, these guys lived in the same neighbourhood, & maybe even on the same street, and that may or may not be relevant. The coming through a window in a child’s bedroom at 3am with a crossbow seems somewhat problematic to explain rationally at this point but who knows? Was a knife a reasonable defence against a crossbow? It’ll be interesting.

Why would the police release the information that Mr. McDonald attacked Mr. Breen with a knife to the media, but only after the first court appearance, would it be made known that Mr. Breen had a crossbow? That seemed kind of odd unto itself, but maybe there’s a justifiable reason for that also?
All comes down to facts. Was the crossbow loaded? If not, is a crossbow by itself a deadly weapon (as a bludgeon)?

For me, the "child's bedroom at 3 am" is enough. Dust him.

You should also consider that cops tend to over-charge, for various reasons. They can always reduce or drop the charges later.