Sea life relocating fast in response to climate change

[coldstream]

It seems these 'scientists' are on the wrong side of history.. as more and more real scientists retrench and rebel against the blind support of AGW and the suffocating orthodoxy imposed by universities and grant giving foundations.

The fact of the matter is that not only is their no Anthropogenic Global Warming.. but there's no Global Warming period.. only the normal regional cycles of climate over the small time scale (let's say a millennium).

I've gone back to referring this as Global Warming.. which the Climate Cult is now desperately trying to re-brand as Climate Change.. as it becomes quite clear the earth is not warming. That way they can take credit for ANYTHING that happens.... storms, hot or cold spells, floods, droughts, or nothing at all. They've been forced into that since their 'Climate Models' have never been able to predict anything.. period.

I suppose there is still money to be made by pandering to a completely discredited political agenda.. by putting out selectively sorted junk psuedo science.. but i wouldn't confuse this with the real thing.

 

[Tecumsehsbones]

The fact of the matter

The BS-to-English translator renders this as "my unsupported opinion."

 

[petros]

Life doesn't evolve any more?

 

[L Gilbert]

Typical CBC drivel.

Yeah. More "climate change" claptrap.

Spoken like true impotents ("impotent" meaning unable to support their opinion).

 

[gerryh]

Spoken like true impotents ("impotent" meaning unable to support their opinion).

You sure "can't get it up so they can't get it off" doesn't apply?

 

[L Gilbert]

Oh, nonsense! All you greenie-weenies scream "climate change!" whenever anything happens. You fools would blame climate change for UFO sightings.

They're easier to see in a cold atmosphere.

Clearly this is a simple case of social mobility among sealife. As some species improve their positions through hard work and thrift, they can afford better neighbourhoods.

And move from their nice tropical paradises? What planet you from again? lol

So, I'm curious how a tax will 'fix' this problem and return the seas/oceans back to where they were 10, 20 or 50 years ago.

Won't happen.

The claptrap that is the reference point in this debate relates to the non-solutions that are perpetually forwarded in addition to the multiple scandals that plague the environaut lobbies that are feverishly trying to find a way to tax the problem.

Well, ya know, the theme is "profit over people and planet".

Yup! And some people like the small of their own excrement.


I thought it was the lefties who were perpetrating the AGW myth. Personally, I'm of the "Eat the Rich" fan club.

Oh, gross. I dislike fat. Let them eat each other.

It seems these 'scientists' are on the wrong side of history.. as more and more real scientists retrench and rebel against the blind support of AGW and the suffocating orthodoxy imposed by universities and grant giving foundations.

The fact of the matter is that not only is their no Anthropogenic Global Warming.. but there's no Global Warming period.. only the normal regional cycles of climate over the small time scale (let's say a millennium).

I've gone back to referring this as Global Warming.. which the Climate Cult is now desperately trying to re-brand as Climate Change.. as it becomes quite clear the earth is not warming. That way they can take credit for ANYTHING that happens.... storms, hot or cold spells, floods, droughts, or nothing at all. They've been forced into that since their 'Climate Models' have never been able to predict anything.. period.

I suppose there is still money to be made by pandering to a completely discredited political agenda.. by putting out selectively sorted junk psuedo science.. but i wouldn't confuse this with the real thing.

lmao You're just plumb fulla unsupported "facts", ain'tcha? You must be funny to watch playing Trivial Pursuit. lol.

 

[petros]

Life is a parasite that eats dead star materials. It's all good. Life is simply composting the universe all nice and green like. Life will go on and evolve to fill any gaps.

 

[L Gilbert]

Life doesn't evolve any more?

Yes, it does. It prefers to do so at its own pace, though.

Life is a parasite that eats dead star materials. It's all good. Life is simply composting the universe all nice and green like. Life will go on and evolve to fill any gaps.

Not at the rate we make the gaps.

 

[petros]

Are you sure? 1500 newbies found every year.

 

[L Gilbert]

Are you sure? 1500 newbies found every year.

Those newbies may have simply been around for ages and we hadn't noticed them before. Speciation apparently doesn't happen THAT frequently. And it's likely that extinction happens a LOT more frequently, like 30 times as frequently by the last guess I saw.

 

[petros]

We have no idea if it does or doesn't. In humans, adaptation happens in just one or two generations.

 

[L Gilbert]

We have no idea if it does or doesn't.

Irrelevant. You made a claim with an open-ended argument.
And it's likely that extinction happens a LOT more frequently, like 30 times as frequently by the last guess I saw.

 

[petros]

We lost plenty of life from the last natural climate change too. Have you seen any sabre tooth tigers,hairy pachyderms or giant sloth lately?

 

[WLDB]

BTW, there are a few Conservatives who believe in conservation and alternative energy, there's money in it..

Like Teddy Roosevelt. Any alive though?

 

[petros]

Like Teddy Roosevelt. Any alive though?

National Parks.

Go Roughriders! Oops Rough Riders

What was the real reason for establishing National Parks and Forest Reserves?

To pay for the Spanish American War.

Loans are taken out against those properties and the massive resources they contain.

It's still done today. Harper did it last summer in Yellowknife to pay for a much need bridge and highway because there is gold in them thar hills that were set aside.

We did it in Saskatchewan a few years back. Saskatchewan and Canada created Grassland Nation Park and the $50B in natural gas and oil that sit under it paid for the Rafferty/Alameda Dam and Shand Power Station which are Crown assets like the bridge in NWT.

The worst part of all, when they created the Grassland National park, they also created Elizabeth May when she caught on.

We've even had to default on loans and lost some of our collateral to the World Bank. Banff and Jasper are now UNESCO.

Canadian Rocky Mountain Parks - UNESCO World Heritage Centre

Yeah. We really have a lot to thank Teddy for.

 

[Tecumsehsbones]

National Parks.

Go Roughriders! Oops Rough Riders

What was the real reason for establishing National Parks and Forest Reserves?

To pay for the Spanish American War.

Loans are taken out against those properties and the massive resources they contain.

It's still done today. Harper did it last summer in Yellowknife to pay for a much need bridge and highway because there is gold in them thar hills that were set aside.

We did it in Saskatchewan a few years back. Saskatchewan and Canada created Grassland Nation Park and the $50B in natural gas and oil that sit under it paid for the Rafferty/Alameda Dam and Shand Power Station which are Crown assets like the bridge in NWT.

The worst part of all, when they created the Grassland National park, they also created Elizabeth May when she caught on.

We've even had to default on loans and lost some of our collateral to the World Bank. Banff and Jasper are now UNESCO.

Canadian Rocky Mountain Parks - UNESCO World Heritage Centre

Yeah. We really have a lot to thank Teddy for.

Damn that Teddy Roosevelt establishing Canadian national parks!

 

[petros]

The idea spread quickly.

 

[Tecumsehsbones]

The idea spread quickly.

Is Canada like the girl who "cain't say no?" She spread quickly too.

 

[petros]

Queen Vicky was no sl*t. They are Crown Assets.

 

[L Gilbert]

We lost plenty of life from the last natural climate change too. Have you seen any sabre tooth tigers,hairy pachyderms or giant sloth lately?

Irrelevant. Different time, different circumstances. It's usually the ones that cannot adapt quickly enough that don't survive. Evolution of species has its own time rate for each specie. Increasing the rate gives the ones with a slower adaptation rate is pretty much the electric chair for them even if it takes decades or a couple centuries. Take a look at African elephants, for instance; used to be herds of them. But there also used to be more foliage for them. Start cutting down their larder and killing them for ivory, isn't exactly what I'd call giving them a chance. (Basic evolutionary theory from about gr. 10).
Got any more red herrings?