Scotland: ‘Pound is as much ours as it is yours’

Dexter Sinister

Unspecified Specialist
Oct 1, 2004
10,168
539
113
Regina, SK
I think Blackleaf is right about this. The EU's experience with the euro ought to make it plain that you can't really share a currency without a political union. It'd be like Canada trying to use the U.S. dollar, or Quebec trying to use the Canadian dollar as an independent country. You have no control over your fiscal and monetary policy, and thus can't really be independent. Scotland's issue isn't really independence anyway, it's local control, for which the obvious solution is a degree of devolution and a federal state.
 

Blackleaf

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 9, 2004
49,906
1,905
113
Scotland to switch to driving on the right if independence given green light

Current road signage system would also be scrapped under scheme nationalists say helps show country is 'part of Europe'


Bruce Roberts
The Guardian
Tuesday 1 April 2014




Link to video: Scottish roads plan explained


Scottish nationalist leaders will attempt this week to give the trailing yes campaign a boost by revealing a series of measures aimed at showing what an independent country would look like.

Seeking to capitalise on the arguments this week about "bullying" England and keeping the pound, they will unveil an ambitious scheme to scrap the current - English inspired - road signage system. M for motorway will be replaced with a new S – for Scotland - and the A trunk roads will become N roads – for Nationalist - in honour of the new country. Blue will be the predominant backing colour.

The scale of the scheme is enormous: Scotland has 2,174 miles of road, including the 273-mile long A9 stretching from Edinburgh to John O'Groats – known as the "spine of Scotland".

It is estimated that 58,000 signs will have to be replaced – scrapping the famous road sign font known as "Transport" with a new Celtic-tinged typeface, Proclaimer. And it could be that they may take the opportunity to renumber all of Scotland's roads, beginning at one.

Independence strategists are believed to have sought advice on the plan from the Stirling University professor of transport semiotics, Lana Gocaireachd. "It's exciting, it gives us a clear difference from the English and is a tangible manifestation of a new, vibrant and independent nation," said one official close to the scheme. "A more conscious uncoupling, perhaps."

Speaking on condition of anonymity, he revealed that if the proposals were seen to swing the needle towards the yes camp then the next stage would be revealed: switch driving on the left of the road to the right – from the first day of independence in 2017.


Road names will change to reflect independence, with M (motorway) becoming S (Scotland) and A roads becoming N roads (nationalist). Photograph: Stephen Finn/Alamy

To ease the transition, Scottish transport planners, under strict conditions of secrecy, have begun drawing up plans for a series of spiral interchanges at the major border transport nodes. These will transition drivers to the correct side of the road – whether travelling south–north or north-south – and avoid cross-border crashes – "a PR disaster worse than horsemeat in haggis", according to one planner.

The campaigners take their inspiration from what Sweden – a much larger country than Scotland – was able to do in a single weekend in September 1967. Adopting the Swedish model, Scotland would need all signs ready, an intensive information campaign, and temporary speed restrictions. Backers say it would be more than symbolic – it would let Paris, Berlin and Brussels know that Scotland was serious about an EU role.

"It sends out an explicit signal: we are part of Europe," said one of the brains behind the scheme. "The little Englanders who want out of Europe are the only ones driving on the left-hand side. We've been the smaller relative dominated and having to copy their ridiculous ways for too long. No more. Just think, this will be an indignity for little England – isolated in Europe and pootling along in the slow lane on the left," he added.

They are concerned, however, that opponents of the move to the right might mobilise under the emotive slogan: "Proud to be left." Some fear that when the plans go public, the charismatic MP George Galloway would not be prepared to stand on the sidelines but would launch his own appeal: "Stay left, hard left."

It is understood that another proposal involving traffic light sequencing has been rejected. Instead of red, amber, green, it would have become red, amber, blue. But there was a fear that this would be adopted south of the border by the Conservatives and so lose any distinctiveness.

Scotland to switch to driving on the right if independence given green light | Politics | The Guardian
 

Blackleaf

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 9, 2004
49,906
1,905
113
Bad news for the Scottish nationalists.

Scotland's nationalist First Minister Alex Salmond begins the most crucial week yet in the battle for Scotland’s future – without the hoped-for Commonwealth Games ‘bounce’ in favour of independence.

Three days before Mr Salmond’s live TV debate with anti-independence campaign leader Alistair Darling, the former Chancellor, a poll for The Mail on Sunday revealed no boost for the ‘Yes’ campaign from the Games in Glasgow.

The Survation survey, the first of Scottish voters to be conducted since the Games began, puts the pro-independence ‘Yes’ vote on 40 per cent – down one point on last month – and ‘No’ unchanged on 46 per cent.

The outcome will be a bitter disappointment for Scottish Nationalists, who had hoped that scheduling the independence referendum on September 18 on the back of the Glasgow Commonwealth Games would lead to a surge of votes to break up the UK.

It also flies in the face of reports that a feel-good factor at Glasgow’s success in staging the Games and Scotland’s record haul of medals would provide a so-called ‘Braveheart bounce’ and revitalise the ‘Yes’ campaign.

The Survation poll found that more than 80 per of voters say the Games have made no difference to how they were likely to vote. Only 12 per cent said they were more likely to vote ‘Yes’, with some voters (7 per cent) even saying it would actually make them more inclined to vote AGAINST independence.


Commonwealth Games fail to deliver ‘Braveheart bounce’ to Salmond’s YES drive in favour of Scottish independence


First poll of Scottish voters conducted since the Games began puts ‘Yes’ vote on 40% – down one point on last month

Those in favour of keeping the Union remain static on 46%


Nationalists hoped Games would lead to surge of anti-UK votes

By Brendan Carlin
3 August 2014
Daily Mail

Alex Salmond begins the most crucial week yet in the battle for Scotland’s future – without the hoped-for Commonwealth Games ‘bounce’ in favour of independence.

Three days before Mr Salmond’s live TV debate with anti-independence campaign leader Alistair Darling, a poll for The Mail on Sunday revealed no boost for the ‘Yes’ campaign from the Games in Glasgow.

The Survation survey, the first of Scottish voters to be conducted since the Games began, puts the ‘Yes’ vote on 40 per cent – down one point on last month – and ‘No’ unchanged on 46 per cent. The outcome will be a bitter disappointment for Scottish Nationalists, who had hoped that scheduling the independence referendum on September 18 on the back of the Games would lead to a surge of votes to break up the UK.


Unaware: As Mr Salmond's campaign for an independent Scotland stalls - which includes being booed by shipbuilders in Rosyth during the naming ceremony of the new aircraft carrier HMS Queen Elizabeth, who fear losing their jobs if Scotland became independent - was mocked by an England fan waving a St George's Flag behind his head during a Commonwealth Games diving event at the Royal Commonwealth Pool in Edinburgh on Friday


Daniel Wallace of Scotland celebrates winning the gold in the Men's 400m Individual Medley Final

It also flies in the face of reports that a feel-good factor at Glasgow’s success in staging the Games and Scotland’s record haul of medals would provide a so-called ‘Braveheart bounce’ and revitalise the ‘Yes’ campaign.

But the survey does show that Scottish First Minister Mr Salmond is a clear favourite to win Tuesday night’s debate – the first head-to-head contest between the two campaign leaders.

The charismatic Scottish Nationalist leader is backed by 37 per cent of voters to come out on top, with barely one in ten predicting that dour ex-Labour Cabinet Minister Mr Darling will triumph.

The result will heap pressure on Mr Darling, the chairman of the anti-independence Better Together campaign, who faced criticism that he is too lacklustre to take on ‘showman’ Mr Salmond.


Opponents: Alex Salmond (left) wants an independent Scotland while former Chancellor Alastair Darling (right), a Scot, wants a Union. The two clash in a TV debate on Tuesday night

The televised debate, before a studio audience of 300 drawn from ‘Yes’, ‘No’ and undecided voters, is seen as crucial if Mr Salmond is to overhaul a stubborn anti-independence lead in the polls.

Yesterday, it emerged that Mr Salmond has been having performance lessons from a lifestyle coach ahead of the showdown.

But in an article for The Mail on Sunday Danny Alexander, the MP for Inverness, backs Mr Darling to present the ‘clear, unvarnished’ case for staying in the UK, in contrast to the ‘verbal acrobatics’ of Mr Salmond. David Cameron has faced criticism for refusing to take on the First Minister himself in a TV debate. And the poll reveals nearly half of Scottish voters brand the Prime Minister a coward.


The UK Coalition Government's Danny Alexander, the Chief Secretary to the Treasury and the Liberal Democrat MP for Inverness, backs former Chancellor Mr Darling to present the ‘clear, unvarnished’ case for staying in the UK

However, more than one in three agree that he was sensible to leave Mr Darling – as a Scot – to tackle Mr Salmond.

The Survation poll found that more than 80 per of voters say the Games have made no difference to how they were likely to vote. Only 12 per cent said they were more likely to vote ‘Yes’, with some voters (7 per cent) even saying it would actually make them more inclined to vote against independence.

A spokesman for the Yes campaign said the poll was ‘very encouraging’ and matched evidence that the result was too close to call. A spokesman for Mr Salmond said: ‘This poll makes clear that Scots believe David Cameron is afraid to take part in a debate with the First Minister.’

Read more: Commonwealth Games fail to deliver 'Braveheart bounce' to Salmond's YES campaign | Mail Online
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook
*******************************************

Danny Alexander, the Liberal Democrat MP for Inverness and the UK coalition government's Chief Secretary to the Treasury, is probably the most famous Scot in Cameron's Cabinet.

Here he speaks out against an independent Scotland....


Keep William Wallace out of it says Danny Alexander


3 August 2014
Daily Mail



I am a Highlander. I spent my early years on Colonsay in the Hebrides, then moved to Lochaber and went to high school in Fort William. One of the most powerful memories of this time was seeing the Commando memorial at Spean Bridge twice a day from the school bus.

This imposing monument commemorates the role played by young men from all over the UK in protecting our freedom during the Second World War.

It’s a sight I have in mind as we approach the decision next month on whether Scotland should break away from the UK and become independent.

That memorial, a tribute to the extraordinary strength of our family of nations, is something I will think of when I watch this week’s TV debate between Alex Salmond and Alistair Darling.

It’s not often you’ll see a Liberal Democrat rooting for an ex-Labour Cabinet Minister like Darling. But now, more than ever, with only a few weeks until the referendum, is a time to lay down party political differences and stand up for the interests of Scotland – and the UK.

Expect fireworks, rhetorical flourishes and verbal acrobatics from the Scottish First Minister.

But expect the truth from Darling, nothing flamboyant – just the clear, unvarnished facts that Scotland is better off staying inside the UK. These dry facts overwhelmingly prove that we are better together. Better in terms of being able to continue to use the pound sterling, better by being part of a larger and recovering economy, better by being part a family of nations with a place on the global stage.

By remaining part of the UK we are more financially and internationally secure and the detailed analysis shows that every man, woman and child in Scotland benefits by £1,400 each and every year as a result of being part of the UK family.


Much as Alex Salmond (left) would like it to be, it is a travesty to try to reduce this to a trite William Wallace (right) style vote ‘from the heart’ for independence versus a ‘stay in the UK’ vote after a sober-minded look at the facts

This is no ‘head versus heart’ debate. Much as Salmond would like it to be, it is a travesty to try to reduce this to a trite William Wallace-style vote ‘from the heart’ for independence versus a ‘stay in the UK’ vote after a sober-minded look at the facts.

In fact, I will vote head and heart to keep Scotland and England, and the other parts of the UK, together.

Our family of nations is bound by the most extraordinary history – and it’s that history, of more than 300 years, that makes us the family we are.

While our fellow citizens in other parts of the UK don’t have a vote, they are increasingly finding their voice on this issue.


Scottish hero William Wallace

People from across the UK tell me Scotland and our place in the UK is valued and, indeed, loved.

Combine this with the fact so many people in Scotland cherish their role in the wider UK, it tells a story – that we are family of nations which doesn’t want, need, or have cause for divorce.

I’m proud to be a Highlander, a Scot and British too.

Why, with all our shared history, with all the evidence overwhelmingly showing that we are better together, when we are part of the most successful family of nations the world has ever seen, would we want to break apart?

My heart says no. My head says no. And that monument in Spean Bridge says no, too.
 
Last edited:

Blackleaf

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 9, 2004
49,906
1,905
113
ANOTHER SETBACK FOR THE CAMPAIGN FOR AN INDEPENDENT SCOTLAND


Scotland's nationalist First Minister Alex Salmond, who is hoping the Scots vote for an independent Scotland in his September 18th referendum, took on former UK Chancellor of the Exchequer Alistair Darling, a fellow Scot and leader of the anti-independence Better Together campaign, in a debate last night which was shown live on Scotland's ITV channel STV and on the internet.

Charismatic Salmond was the favourite by the bookies to win, but it was actually first blood to dour Darling and the Better Together campaign.

Darling had Salmond - who at stages was actually BOOED by the Scottish audience - on the ropes, leaving the First Minister to babble on about the risk of alien attacks and pandas.

Mr Darling shed his reputation for being a dull, dour Scot (MPs used to fall asleep in the Commons when he delivered his Budget speeches) to go on the attack, branding plans to keep the pound 'stupidity on stilts' and accusing the Yes campaign of being based on 'guess work, blind faith and crossed fingers'.

But people trying to watch the historic head-to-head were dismayed after the STV website crashed under the intense demand from millions of people worldwide who wanted to watch it.

Mr Salmond repeatedly complained that independence was the only way to prevent a future Tory government while Mr Darling insisted Scotland was stronger as part of the UK.

As the political temperature rose, Mr Darling accused Mr Salmond of 'scrabbling around', claiming the First Minister has 'lots of good lines but no answers'.

Voters in Scotland will make their big decision on independence in the historic referendum on September 18.

Last night's debate took place in front of an audience of 350 at the Royal Conservatoire of Scotland in Glasgow. The audience was split between those wanting independence and those against it,

A snap exit poll by ICM for the Guardian of more than 500 viewers found that 56 per cent believed Mr Darling won, with just 44 per cent backing the SNP leader.

The No campaign has been consistently ahead in the opinion polls, despite months of intense debate, impassioned pleas and trading of facts and figures.

The latest IpsosMORI poll shows support for independence at 40%, with support for the Union at 54%.

But one of the biggest threats to the Yes campaign has been growing doubts about the currency an independent Scotland would use.

After ditching the idea of adopting the euro, the SNP has claimed it would enter a currency union with the UK and continue to use the pound.

However the Tories, Labour and Lib Dems have all made clear they would block a deal, whoever wins the next general election.

Amongst Scottish celebrities in favour of independence are The Proclaimers; comedian Kevin Bridges; actor Alan Cumming; and former James Bond actor Sir Sean Connery (who professes to love Scotland so much yet lives in tax exile abroad).

Scottish celebs that are against independence include singers Rod Stewart and Susan Boyle; Trainspotting and Star Wars actor Ewan McGregor; comedians Billy Connelly and Wee Jimmy Krankie; and Scotland and Great Britain cyclist Sir Chris Hoy.

Those keeping quiet include Eurythmics singer Annie Lennox; actor James McAvoy; and tennis star Andy Murray.

But with him being beaten in a TV debate by the leader of the anti-independence campaign, and with polls showing that the Scots will, as things stand, vote against independence, it seems that Salmond has an awful lot to do to persuade Scots to vote for independence on September 18th.

First blood to the No campaign: Salmond flounders in explosive TV debate as Darling tears into his plans for Scottish independence - but millions FAIL to see it after STV website crashes


First Minister and ex-Chancellor took part in live two-hour debate on STV

Salmond under pressure over currency an independent Scotland would use

On the ropes, First Minister talks about risk of alien attacks and pandas

STV website crashes as millions worldwide try to watch debate online

Snap exit poll after debate ended says 56% of viewers thought Darling won

Voters to decide Scotland's fate in historic referendum on September 18

New IpsosMORI poll puts No campaign on 54% but Yes campaign on 40%

Up to half a million people are still undecided with just weeks to go

No campaign has received £2.6million, ahead of £1.5million for Yes camp

Cameron, Clegg and Miliband sign joint declaration promising tax powers

By Matt Chorley, Mailonline Political Editor
6 August 2014
Daily Mail


Alex Salmond took a pounding last night as he came under pressure to explain how his dream of independence would work in practice.

The First Minister was defeated by former Chancellor Alistair Darling in the first TV debate of the referendum campaign, floundering when questioned about a future currency and labelled 'snide' by audience members.

Better Together leader Mr Darling shed his reputation for being dull to go on the attack, branding plans to keep the pound 'stupidity on stilts' and accusing the Yes campaign of being based on 'guess work, blind faith and crossed fingers'.

But people trying to watch the historic head-to-head were dismayed after the STV website crashed under the intense demand from viewers worldwide.

Former Chancellor Alistair Darling (right) had Scotland's First Minister Alex Salmond on the ropes over what currency an independent Scotland would use, dismissing the idea of keeping the pound as 'stupidity on stilts'. A snap poll after the debate found that 56% of people believed Darling won the debate, with 44% believing Salmond had won

The two men repeatedly clashed over whether Scotland would be better remaining in the UK or becoming an independent country

Mr Salmond repeatedly complained that independence was the only way to prevent a future Tory government while Mr Darling insisted Scotland was stronger as part of the UK.

As the political temperature rose, Mr Darling accused Mr Salmond of 'scrabbling around', claiming the First Minister has 'lots of good lines but no answers'.

Voters in Scotland will make their big decision on independence in the historic referendum on September 18.

Last night's debate took place in front of an audience of 350 at the Royal Conservatoire of Scotland in Glasgow.

A snap exit poll by ICM for the Guardian of more than 500 viewers found that 56 per cent believed Mr Darling won, with just 44 per cent backing the SNP leader.

The No campaign has been consistently ahead in the opinion polls, despite months of intense debate, impassioned pleas and trading of facts and figures.


But one of the biggest threats to the Yes campaign has been growing doubts about the currency an independent Scotland would use.

After ditching the idea of adopting the euro, the SNP has claimed it would enter a currency union with the UK and continue to use the pound.

However the Tories, Labour and Lib Dems have all made clear they would block a deal, whoever wins the next general election.


Some 350 people were chosen to be in the audience at the Royal Conservatoire in Glasgow, with balance between those for and against independence

The debate swung between detailed points and aggressive personal attacks between the two men


In a withering attack on the lack of a back-up plan, Mr Darling told his opponent: 'I want you to do something that is really difficult. I want you to contemplate for one minute you might be wrong. What is Plan B? Please tell us, we need to know.'

As the audience heckled him, Mr Salmond fought back, repeatedly insisting: 'We will keep the pound, it is our pound as well as England's pound.

'This is Scotland's pound. It doesn't belong to George Osborne, it doesn't belong to you. It has been built up by Scotland for a long time.'

But Mr Darling dismissed the idea of a currency union as 'stupidity on stilts'.

He added: 'Any eight-year-old can tell you the flag of a country, the capital of a country and its currency.

'I presume the flag is the Saltire, I assume our capital will still be Edinburgh, but you can't tell us what currency we will have. What is an eight-year-old going to make of that?'

Mounting a sustained attack on Mr Salmond, he said that without a currency union, Scotland would be left using the pound 'like Panama or Ecuador uses the dollar'.

'That would be ruinous for our financial services industry, is that your fall back position, is that plan B?'

He also had Mr Salmond on the ropes over his infamous claim to have legal advice about joining the European Union which he later admitted did not exist.

Winding up his arguments at the end of the two-hour clash, Mr Darling declared: 'Far too much of this debate has been characterised by guesswork, blind faith and crossed fingers.'

At the start of the debate, Mr Salmond urged voters in Scotland to seize the opportunity of independence with both hands.

He said: 'It should be a shared position tonight that Scotland could be a successful independent country.

'My case this evening is this: no one, no one will do a better job of running Scotland than the people who live and work in this country.

'On September 18 we have the opportunity of a lifetime. We should seize that opportunity with both hands.'

But Mr Darling warned 'the future of our country' was now at stake. He added: 'There are times that for the love of our family and the love of our country it's sometimes best to say No, not because we can't, but simply because it's not the best thing to do.

'In six weeks time we will make the biggest decision we've ever made here in Scotland and remember this, if we decide to leave there is no going back, there is no second chance.

'So let's say with confidence, let's say with pride, let's say with optimism No thanks to the risks of independence, and let's say let's have the best of both worlds not just for us but for generations to come.'

A new IpsosMori poll released as the debate got underway suggested the race is tightening, but the Yes vote still trails by about 14 points.

Of those 'absolutely certain' to vote, 54 per cent said they intend to vote No, unchanged since June, 40 per cent would vote Yes, up four percentage points, while six per cent are undecided, down by four points.

When undecided voters were removed from the figures, 58 per cent of those certain to vote would vote No, down by two points, while 42 per cent would vote Yes, up by two points.

However, the poll showed a large gender gap in how men and women intended to vote. Some 47 per cent of men said they were planning to vote Yes, but only 33 per cent of women planned to vote yes.

Mr Salmond's team hoped the success of the Commonwealth Games in Glasgow would bolster nationalist sentiment, with a strong showing in the medal table.

The debate over Scotland going it alone has gone global, with celebrities including Shrek star Mike Myers (who was born in Canada to British parents), singer David Bowie and even Kermit from The Muppets issuing please to preserve the UK.

Mr Salmond initially refused to take part in the debate, insisting he would only face Prime Minister David Cameron.

But Mr Cameron said it was right that the issues were thrashed out between Scots, and Mr Darling is the leader of the Better Together campaign.

Mr Salmond complained that policies such as the bedroom tax were being imposed by Westminster

Mr Darling said those calling for independence had no 'plan B' for how to run Scotland's economy


As the debate got underway, the STV website crashed as millions of people around the world tried to log on to watch the debate

The latest IpsosMORI survey released as the debate began suggests the race is narrowing slightly, but the No campaign still has a 14 point lead


ANALYSIS: HOW MR BORING BEAT SALMOND THE SHOWMAN BY SOWING THE SEEDS OF DOUBT

By Matt Chorley, MailOnline Political Editor

Alex Salmond went into the showdown as the bookies favourite to win. It was the showman against Mr Boring.

The Yes campaign was pinning its hopes on the First Minister delivering the knockout blow needed to build momentum ahead of polling day.

But Alistair Darling didn’t need to win last night’s clash, he just had to make sure Salmond didn’t secure victory.

He mocked Salmond’s arrogance, challenging him to ‘contemplate for one minute you might be wrong’.

The lines on the currency were damning, pointing out that an eight-year-old knows the flag, capital and currency of a country, but nationalists could not say what Scots would have in their wallets after independence.


The currency question is crucial, and speaks to wider doubts about what independence would mean in reality.

Voters will be asking themselves: If Salmond doesn’t know what will happen to the pound, has he really thought this through?

There were times when the First Minister put Darling on the spot: notably on whether he agreed with David Cameron that Scotland could be a successful independent country.

But more often he looked desperate, digging up old quotes and jokes to claim the No campaign was Project Fear
claiming independence would mean Scots would have to drive on the right or be more at risk from alien invaders.

No-one believes that, and it looked ridiculous when there are big question marks hanging over how his figures add up.

Few will have changed their minds after this 105-minute showdown, which suits the No campaign just fine.

The problem is Salmond already thinks he is the King of Scotland. His biggest porkie came when he declared a majority of Scots voted for him in 2011 (it was 45 per cent).

He repeatedly boasted independence would mean never again would the Tories rule over Scotland.

But democracy doesn’t always go your way Alex, as you could be about to find out.

Mr Salmond received performance advice from a lifestyle coach and happiness guru during his preparations.

Claire Howell, who runs a psychological coaching firm in Nottingham, has previously advised former footballer Stan Collymore.

She has banned the SNP from using 'Braveheart' words, such as 'freedom'. Instead she has urged Mr Salmond and his SNP MSPs to use words such as 'exciting', 'historic' and 'transformational'.

Mr Darling, meanwhile, had to build on his reputation as a number-crunching accountant, and display some passion about why Scotland should remain in the UK.

Time and again the debate returned to money, and how the figures for independence would add up. Mr Darling insisted the country was better off in the UK.

'Money has flowed both ways over the last 30 years, but in the last 22 years Scotland has spent more than it has put in, so we have benefited from being part of the United Kingdom,' Mr Darling said.

'We have higher public spending here per head than they do in the rest of the United Kingdom.

'As someone who is fiercely proud of being Scottish I am not unhappy that from time to time we tackle problems in Liverpool, in Manchester, in Norwich, in Newcastle, because as well as being Scottish I regard myself as being part of something bigger.

'But we benefit from being part of the UK at the moment.'

Mr Salmond, however, insisted: 'In each one of the last 33 years, Scotland has paid more in tax per person than the average of the UK. Over the last five years we have £8 billion more into the treasury than we have had out of it, in relative terms. that is £1,500 a head for every man, woman and child in Scotland.'

Better Together campaign director Blair McDougall said the debate would 'prove to be a huge, possibly decisive, moment in the referendum campaign'.

He claimed: 'Alistair Darling asked the questions Scotland needed answers to. The First Minister's failure to offer basic answers was there for all to see.'

But Blair Jenkins, chief executive of the pro-independence Yes Scotland group, insisted the debate had resulted in a 'clear win for the Yes campaign' with a 'positive, optimistic and visionary case presented by the First Minister against another dose of negativity and scaremongering from Mr Darling'.

Last night's debate was hosted by STV's political editor Bernard Ponsonby.

Under the rules agreed after intense negotiations, Mr Ponsonby quizzed both Mr Salmond and Mr Darling, the pair then cross examined each other, before being questioned by members of the audience.

Ahead of the clash, the No campaign got a major boost with the news it received more than double the donations given to the Yes camp last month.

New figures from the Electoral Commission show the No campaign has been given £2.7million, compared to just £1.5million given to the Yes campaign

AUDIENCE ROUNDS ON 'SNIDE' SALMOND FOR BEING 'NOT NICE'

Some audience members rounded on Alex Salmond for his personal attacks and petty point-scoring.

A businessman said he had attended to find out what the impact of independence would be on industry.

'I am disappointed with you,' the man told Mr Salmond.

'As a politician of some note, some of your remarks have been snide and not very nice, coming from the leader of the Scottish Parliament.

'If this is what we are going to have in independent Scotland, then obviously we are in for trouble.'

The Electoral Commission reported four pro-Union groups received donations of £151,248 between June 27 and July 24.

But two pro-independence groups were given just £65,000, the second pre-poll donations and loans report for the Scottish independence referendum reveals.

It means that since December, to No campaign has been given a total of £2,657,723, well ahead of the £1,524,120 donated to nationalists.

Both sides have boosted by seven figure donations, with Harry Potter author JK Rowling giving the No campaign £1million and Euromillions winners Chris and Colin Weir the biggest backers for the Yes campaign.

In an attempt to head off support for independence, David Cameron, Nick Clegg and Ed Miliband yesterday issued a rare joint declaration promising Scotland more powers – including setting income tax – if it stays in the UK.

The Tory, Lib Dem and Labour leaders hope the prospect of more devolution, without severing ties with England, will persuade undecided voters to choose to preserve the Union.

The three leaders backed the joint statement declaring: 'We support a strong Scottish Parliament in a strong United Kingdom and we support the further strengthening of the Parliament's powers.'

The three go on to promise to 'strengthen further the powers of the Scottish Parliament, in particular in the areas of fiscal responsibility and social security'.

Mr Clegg said the declaration is a 'significant statement of common purpose from the parties that have shaped Scotland's home rule journey'.

Mr Miliband said: 'We will introduce a new Scotland Act with more powers for the Scottish Parliament over tax, welfare and jobs.'

Chancellor George Osborne said the cross-party commitment gave Scotland an opportunity to have the 'best of both worlds'.

But Canon Kenyon Wright, who chaired the Scottish Constitutional Convention which spearheaded the campaign for a devolved assembly in the 1990s, said: 'The latest 'offer' of more powers from the unionist parties looks suspiciously like a rather desperate bribe - but it is not an answer to Scotland's needs.

'The central issue at stake in the referendum is simple: Where should the ultimate power to make decisions that affect the lives of people in Scotland lie - at Westminster or in Scotland?'

Mr Salmond's team hope the success of the Commonwealth Games in Glasgow would bolster nationalist sentiment, with a strong showing in medal table

A number of major companies have sounded the alarm about the impact of independence on their business, raising the prospects of jobs moving south in Scotland goes it alone.

Pensions and savings company Standard Life yesterday said it remained in the dark over 'material issues' surrounding Scottish independence.

Six months ago the firm, which has been based in Scotland for 189 years, issues a plea to Mr Salmond for clarity over what independence would mean for its four million customers, its shareholders and staff.

But in its half-year results today, the company warned: 'We do not believe that further clarity has been provided on any of these issues since our 2013 annual report and accounts was published on 27 February 2014.'

The company, which employs about 5,000 people in Scotland out of a total headcount of 8,500, has around £254 billion of assets under administration.

BP boss Bob Dudley has warned all businesses would face 'big uncertainties' particularly over the future currency if voters back independence.

Defence giant BAE Systems, which employs 37,000 people in the UK, says Scotland remaining in the 300-year-old union offers 'greater certainty and stability for our business'.

Lloyds Banking Group, Barclays, Standard Life, Royal Bank of Scotland, the Macfarlane Group and Breedon Aggregates have all listed independence in their risk management sections of their annual reports.

People around the world trying to watch the debate were greeted with blank screens, as servers struggled to cope with demand

DARLING'S TOP OF THE TWEETS: EX CHANCELLOR'S QUESTIONING GETS BIGGEST RESPONSE ONLINE

Alistair Darling's repeated questioning of Alex Salmond's currency plans for an independent Scotland got Twitter users most excited during last night's debate, according to figures from the social media website.

More than 2,000 tweets were sent during that point of the first live television debate on the referendum, with a total of 186,267 sent overall throughout the show on STV.

While a Guardian/ICM poll after the debate seemed to show Better Together campaigner Mr Darling to be the winner by a margin of 12%, the Yes campaign garnered more than double the number of tweets over the course of the day.

Twitter said 72,000 tweets were made about the Yes campaign, and 31,000 about the Better Together campaign.

Broadcaster STV faced criticism tonight after online viewers reported problems trying to watch the head-to-head debate on Scottish independence.

While television viewers in Scotland could watch the clash between the country's First Minister Alex Salmond and former Chancellor Alistair Darling, a surge in demand online across the rest of the UK caused STV's livestream to crash.

On Twitter, STV said: 'For those having problems with the STV Player at the moment we are aware of this and are working hard to fix it.'

Later it added: 'We're still working on fixing the live stream. The debate will be available online in full a few hours after the programme has finished.'

A number of viewers expressed their frustration on Twitter.

Labour MP Diane Abbott wrote: 'Finally watching £indyref debate after struggling for 40 minutes with dead STV Iplayer.'

Broadcaster Andrew Neil added: 'Trying to watch Salmond v Darling on STV iPlayer. But system seem overwhelmed. Any thoughts?'

Claire Stewart tweeted: 'An independent Scotland needs better equipped public broadcasters. £stvcrash £ScotDecides.'

Labour MP Tom Watson said: 'It may not be of interest to many but you would have thought a debate on the future of the union would be broadcast UK wide.'

The two-hour long clash was being broadcast on STV, on ITV Borders Scotland via Freeview and online at STV | Scottish television | Scotland's digital media company.

HOW THE STARS ARE LINING UP

FOR INDEPENDENCE

Sir Sean Connery

Actor Sir Sean Connery: 'The people of Scotland are the best guardians of their own future'.

Actor Alan Cumming : 'The world is waiting for us. I know Scotland is ready.''

The Proclaimers: 'Scotland has huge national resources, with its people, its wave power – all the possibilities that this country has...we need to take charge of our own affairs'

Comedian Kevin Bridges: 'If the referendum was tomorrow, I'd probably vote yes.'

AGAINST INDEPENDENCE

David Bowie

David Bowie: 'Scotland, stay with us.'

Singer Rod Stewart : 'I'd hate to see the Union broken after all these years — and I don't think it will happen.'

Cyclist Sir Chris Hoy said: 'I've said numerous times how proud I am to be Scottish and how proud I have been to compete for Britain too. I don't think these two things necessarily have to be mutually exclusive.'

Ewan McGregor: 'I'm a Scotsman and I love Scotland with all my heart. But I also like the idea of Great Britain, and I don't know that it wouldn't be a terrible shame to break it all up.'

Susan Boyle: 'I am a proud, patriotic Scot, passionate about my heritage and my country. But I am not
a nationalist.'

Billy Connolly: 'I don't believe in having more layers of government that ordinary people will have to pay for. I think it's time for people to get together, not split apart.'

Wee Jimmy Krankie aka Janette Tough: 'Alex Salmond can sod off 'cos I don't want it. We don't live in Scotland so we won't get to vote and I don't think it's fair.'

KEEPING QUIET

Andy Murray

Singer Annie Lennox: 'It will be taken by the citizens of Scotland themselves, who need to seriously weigh up the pros and cons, as the responsibility lies wholeheartedly upon their shoulders.'

Tennis player Andy Murray: 'It's very difficult to have an opinion these days because half the people will agree with you and half of the people will think you're an absolute idiot'

Actor James McAvoy: ''I won't be getting involved at all. It's just counter-productive to my job, it's not what I do, and I don't think it's helpful to have me involved in it.'




 
Last edited:

Nuggler

kind and gentle
Feb 27, 2006
11,596
141
63
Backwater, Ontario.
"would be a lot of time required if Iceland were to float their own currency"

Good one Captain. May I use that ?.............ice.............float..........ah never mind.:lol:


It's so much, just so MUCH fun, to get Blackdork pissed off and watch him cut and paste every newspaper & internet site in the UK.
Pound this, pound that.
carry on Blackie.
someone's rootin fer ya.

If Sean Connery is on board for Independence, I'd say it's a done deal that they will be separating.

I thought they'd already had the vote and had cast loose bow and aft. But then, many things to do. Scotland's independence - well it's just about freakin time, so that news doesn't get read too often .
Good luck to them.
I want my goddamn croft and me sheep returned and soon.
Me great great great great grandads pipes should be lying about somewheres. Hope I ken find em.
Fukkin Brits. Arrogant, hostile, inbred, bad toothed bastards.............cept the one I married eh.
 

damngrumpy

Executive Branch Member
Mar 16, 2005
9,949
21
38
kelowna bc
As someone of Scottish background I hope the English occupation ends after centuries
of being lumped in with the rest. I am counting on the new horizon for Scotland
As for the currency this argument is always present. Remember Quebec said they would
use the Loony It later turned out we couldn't really stop them from doing so.
All this is being done for the self interest of the English who don't want to look bad when
its over. I hope they go their own way and in this case take their oil with them
 

Blackleaf

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 9, 2004
49,906
1,905
113
If Sean Connery is on board for Independence, I'd say it's a done deal that they will be separating.

The polls consistently support a victory for those wanting Scotland to stay in the Union in the 18th September referendum.

If anything, "Sir" Sean saying he supports independence will put Scots off voting for independence.

Most Scots are pissed off with hypocritical "Sir" Sean because he professes to love Scotland and claims to be a patriotic Scot yet he lives in tax exile abroad and has paid little in the way of Scottish taxes for the last twenty years or so.

As someone of Scottish background I hope the English occupation ends after centuries
of being lumped in with the rest.

As someone with an English background I hope the Canadian occupation of Newfoundland ends after 65 years of being lumped in with the rest and it is returned to Britain forthwith.

Put it this way - You know as much about the history behind Scotland joining the Union which has served it well over the years, the most successful political union in history, than a dog knows about string theory, so I think it's only best for you not to comment on this particular topic.

All this is being done for the self interest of the English who don't want to look bad when
its over.
If Scotland becomes independent it has to start standing on its own two feet and England has to start looking after her own affairs and her own interests and not those of Scotland.

An independent Scotland will NOT be using the pound. Not as it is doing now with its currency controlled by the Bank of England. The British Government has made it clear it will block such a thing from happening. Scottish independence means just that - Scottish independence. That includes Scotland getting its own currency. You only need to look at the Euro to see that such a currency union does not work. As a result, the Scots Nats are at a loss to tell the Scots what currency an independent Scotland would use and this is playing right into the hands of the Better Together campaign.

The pampered Scots have had it their own way for far too long now, what with English taxpayers paying for Scottish freebies like free university courses, free medical prescriptions, etc, all things which are denied to the English, who have to pay for those things. So the English won't be too pleased if England still keeps pampering the Scots if they vote to go their separate ways.

I don't know why all this debate is going on anyway. An independent Scotland, should it join the EU as a new member state (a newly independent Scotland would find itself outside the EU and would have to join a queue to get back in), would have to join the euro at some point. It would have to do this despite most Scots being AGAINST joining the euro. And that is what will happen should Scotland become independent and it joins the EU as a new Member State. So this is something else the Scots will be thinking of come 18th September. All EU member states - with the exception of the UK and Denmark - have to join the euro at some point.

I hope they go their own way and in this case take their oil with them
"Their" oil is running out. Production peaked in 1999 and it's been in terminal decline since. It won't last forever.

And two groups of people who may have something to say on this matter are the Orkney Islanders and the Shetland Islanders who, despite their islands politically being a part of Scotland, don't consider themselves to be Scottish - they are Nordic, and therefore much more closely related to the English than to the Celtic Scots. In fact, they don't like the Scots very much. Most of the islanders are rabidly against Scottish independence and, in the unlikely event of the Scots voting for independence, Shetland and Orkney may decide to secede from Scotland and remain in the UK. This is a very real possibility (it's similar to Northern Ireland remaining in the UK when the rest of Ireland seceded in 1922). This would be a big problem for the Scots because Orkney and Shetland have a huge number of North Sea oil fields in their waters, so that oil would remain in UK waters should Orkney and Shetland remain in the UK.
 
Last edited:

captain morgan

Hall of Fame Member
Mar 28, 2009
28,429
148
63
A Mouse Once Bit My Sister
The polls consistently support a victory for those wanting Scotland to stay in the Union in the 18th September referendum.

There is only one poll that counts, everything else is speculation

Most Scots are pissed off with hypocritical "Sir" Sean because he professes to love Scotland and claims to be a patriotic Scot yet he lives in tax exile abroad and has paid little in the way of Scottish taxes for the last twenty years or so.

The question on my mind is how much of the Scottish taxes are paid to England?

If Connery doesn't support that payment, it makes perfect sense to opt-out of the system as a whole
 

Blackleaf

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 9, 2004
49,906
1,905
113
There is only one poll that counts, everything else is speculation

And the polls show that the Scots Nats are on course to lose.

The question on my mind is how much of the Scottish taxes are paid to England?
No. The question should be how much English taxes go to Scotland, paying for things like their free medical prescriptions; free care for the elderly; free university courses and other freebies, which are denied to the English, who have to pay for all of those things in England?

Look at the plethora of brand-spanking new buildings being put up all around Scotland, which you will find in no English city outside of London, all of which are being paid for by the English taxpayer.

English money is paying for the Scots to live a life of luxury.

Scotland takes more from the UK Treasury than it puts in, and has done for years. It's a drain on UK monetary resources and that's why there are many in England praying for Scotland to leave.
 

Blackleaf

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 9, 2004
49,906
1,905
113
You piss and moan all about how the Scots are a drag on Britain but go on to promote why they should not separate.

Don't make no sense


They shouldn't separate because if they did Scotland will become an irrelevant little cold, mountainous, empty, rocky backwater with no relevance on the world stage surviving only on dwindling reserves of North Sea oil with nothing but whisky and shortbread to export.

There's no way the Scots are going to want to be weaned off England's breast.
 

Blackleaf

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 9, 2004
49,906
1,905
113
After Alex Salmond is defeated by Better Together leader Alistair Darling in their televised head-to-head...

In 2003, Mr Salmond told me Scotland would be independent in 20 years. After that debate I doubt it

By Stephen Glover
7 August 2014
Daily Mail


Diminished in stature: The wily, charming Alex Salmond, Scotland's First Minister, was easily beaten in the debate by the supposedly boring, bank managerish Alistair Darling

During the 2003 Scottish elections I found myself walking around the back streets of Dundee with Alex Salmond. He was not then leader of the Scottish Nationalists, though he had been (1990-2000), and would soon be again. I remember him as an amiable and rumpled figure.

At one of our pit-stops he said something that chilled my blood. He told me that in 20 years, if not before, Scotland would be an independent country. He asserted this so calmly and confidently that it was hard to disbelieve him.

I wonder whether Tuesday evening’s debate with Alistair Darling will mark the point when Mr Salmond and the rest of the world began to realise that his prophecy of an independent Scotland has been confounded, at any rate for a generation.

And I also wonder whether the debate might remind Labour that Mr Darling (still only 60) is a considerable but often underrated politician who in most respects stands head and shoulders above the party’s present leader, Ed Miliband.

The debate had been billed as a contest between the wily, charming Mr Salmond, and the boring, bank managerish Mr Darling. Some supporters of the Union had had so many qualms about the former Chancellor that there had been private talk of replacing him with the more pugnacious John Reid, a Cabinet minister in the Blair administration.

In the event, though, it was the supposedly plodding Mr Darling who easily won the day. An instant Guardian/ICM poll after the debate gave him victory by 56 per cent to 44 per cent. It is hard to find anyone even in the Yes camp who thinks their man did well.

By the way, let me say how outrageous it was that the contest could not be viewed south of the border except online, and even then the picture was often interrupted. These two men were discussing the future of our country, Britain, and yet most citizens of the United Kingdom were excluded from the debate.

Part of the explanation for Mr Darling’s success was that he seemed so much more energised than usual without being aggressive. Mr Salmond, by contrast, was less than his normal chirpy self. He seemed strangely depleted.

We were reminded that Mr Darling is a battle-hardened politician who learned to stand up to Gordon Brown, and was Chancellor when Britain was battered by the Great Depression. As First Minister Mr Salmond is a titan among the pygmies of Scottish politics, but he appeared less formidable alongside a figure of stature.

But the real reason for the former Chancellor’s triumph was that he skewered his opponent at his most vulnerable point. Mr Salmond declined at least five times to outline what he would do if Westminster refused to agree to a sterling union, as the three main parties have said they would. As he thrashed around, the First Minister was booed and heckled.

All he could say was that the pound belongs to Scotland as much as it does to England. This is plainly true now, but it would not be if the Scots voted for independence. Mr Salmond does not have a ‘Plan B’ on the pound. Nor is he able to guarantee Scotland’s continued membership of the European Union.


More energised then usual: We were reminded that Mr Darling is a battle-hardened politician who learned to stand up to Gordon Brown, and was Chancellor when Britain was battered by the Great Depression

There is a very great irony in all this. For Mr Salmond’s sinuous approach has been to offer the Scots a version of independence calculated not to frighten them. The Queen —once a bugbear to many Scottish Nationalists — would be retained as head of state. Ancient Scottish regiments would not lose their names.

And the familiar pound, which the Scots Nats once wished to dump in favour of the euro, would be kept as another reassuring piece of evidence that in many respects life would go on as it had.

Now this strategy of ‘independence lite’ has blown up. A go-it-alone Scotland can keep the Queen, though possibly not the regiments. But it might, for a time at least, find itself outside the EU. And it certainly can’t hang on to the pound.

In other words, Mr Salmond’s frankly underhand attempts to persuade the Scots that independence would represent a relatively small and unscary step are being exposed as deeply misleading. Mr Darling brilliantly tightened the screw on Tuesday evening.

Despite the occasional wobble, almost every opinion poll continues to show a robust majority for the No camp. The latest poll, released to coincide with the debate, showed that of those who have made up their minds, 58 per cent plan to vote No, compared to 42 per cent choosing Yes.

Although Mr Salmond tried to rig the outcome by insisting that 16-year-olds should have a vote, there is at least some anecdotal evidence that the ruse is backfiring, as the young turn out to be less nationalistic than he had hoped.

The First Minister is a clever and resourceful man. He has spent his whole political life campaigning for Scottish independence. I’m sure he hasn’t given up yet. But he must know in his heart that, barring a miracle, he is going to lose the vote on September 18.

I think that may explain why, despite his best efforts, there was something lacklustre about his performance on Tuesday evening. The truth is that the Yes camp has the more powerful arguments over the pound and Scotland’s membership of the EU. Independence is too big a jump into the dark for most Scots.


Face off: Mr Salmond’s frankly underhand attempts to persuade the Scots that independence would represent a relatively small and unscary step are being exposed as deeply misleading

However, we Unionists should not be counting our chickens yet. One careless remark by a Tory Cabinet minister in Westminster could inflame anti-English sentiment. A No vote may seem highly probable, but it isn’t certain.

And that is why we should be grateful that Alistair Darling is leading the ‘Better Together’ campaign. He demonstrated on Tuesday that he is a substantial politician who did not deserve the brickbats that have been thrown at him. He should acquit himself well when he engages with Mr Salmond again on August 25 in a debate the BBC will broadcast outside Scotland.

Although the ex-Chancellor is thought not to want to return to front-line politics, there are surely few, if any, who can match him on the Opposition front bench at Westminster. Wouldn’t Labour benefit from his experience, moderation and good sense? Mightn’t he be a better leader than Mr Miliband?

As for Mr Salmond, he will probably survive a No vote, though his life’s work will be in ruins. He and the Scots Nats will have to accept a kind of halfway house in which a semi-detached Scotland remains part of the United Kingdom.

On Tuesday, David Cameron Nick Clegg and Ed Miliband published joint declaration offering the Scottish Parliament me powers over tax and social security if voters reject independence. This is intended to woo ‘don’t know’ voters into the No camp.

After the referendum the three main parties can hardly withdraw their pledge, which probably concedes more than is necessary. One way or another, Scotland will go on growing away from England — while England continues to pick up the bill.

If that is very far from ideal, at least it is preferable to the break-up of the United Kingdom, and the end of Britain. Watching Alistair Darling impale Alex Salmond on Tuesday evening, it’s now possible to be pretty confident that this is not going to happen.


Read more: STEPHEN GLOVER: In 2003, Mr Salmond told me Scotland would be independent in 20 years. After that debate I doubt it* | Mail Online
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook
 
Last edited: