Robocalls?? Tempest in a Teapot. BIG surprise.

Retired_Can_Soldier

The End of the Dog is Coming!
Mar 19, 2006
12,399
1,371
113
60
Alberta
I don't think anyone is confused about these points.

The report states that these calls did happen and they did mislead and antagonize voters.

The report also states that there is not enough evidence to prove malicious intent.

People on either side of this debate seems to simply disagree on what this means.

Conservative supporters keep claiming that this means that they never did anything wrong and all the scrutiny was wrong and unwarranted.

People who are more critical are focusing on the fact that the report confirms that these calls did take place, and that saying that there is not enough evidence to prove intent is a far cry from proving that nothing wrong took place and that all the scrutiny was unwarranted.

Tempest in a Teapot. Scandal where there was none.

I read the report (their report) there is nothing to suggest the Conservative Party deliberately misdirected voters.
The Liberal party also gave wrong information and I see no scandal there.

But hey, like I said: Harper=Sharks=Lazer Beams on their heads=equals Election Canada buckling under.

Suck it up Princess. Elections Canada has spoken.
 

BornRuff

Time Out
Nov 17, 2013
3,175
0
36
I read the report (their report) there is nothing to suggest the Conservative Party deliberately misdirected voters.

I don't know how to say this more clearly. We agree on the facts, you simply interpret them differently. Repeating the same facts that we agree on over and over again doesn't move this conversation forward.
 

Retired_Can_Soldier

The End of the Dog is Coming!
Mar 19, 2006
12,399
1,371
113
60
Alberta
I don't know how to say this more clearly. We agree on the facts, you simply interpret them differently. Repeating the same facts that we agree on over and over again doesn't move this conversation forward.

What conversation? You don't converse, you argue semantics.
 

BornRuff

Time Out
Nov 17, 2013
3,175
0
36
What conversation? You don't converse, you argue semantics.

Where? Please provide an example?

If the calls took place or not is a factual issue, not a semantic one.

The fact that not being able to prove intent is very different than saying that nobody did anything wrong and this was all a stupid waste of time is not an issue of semantics.
 

FiveParadox

Governor General
Dec 20, 2005
5,875
43
48
Vancouver, BC
How is this conversation still happening? The facts at issue are just that: Facts.


  • The Conservative Party placed misleading calls to electors. This is a fact.
  • The Commissioner of Canada Elections has found insufficient evidence to prove intent.
 

tay

Hall of Fame Member
May 20, 2012
11,548
1
36
Despite Senator Mike Duffy’s testimony that Conservative operatives were behind misleading election eve phone calls in British Columbia in 2008, the Commissioner of Canada Elections has refused to reopen the investigation into the case.

Commissioner Yves Côté said “technological obstacles” and legal constraints prevent his office from reopening the case.

Côté was responding to a request from Saanich-Gulf Islands MP and Green Party leader Elizabeth May, who wanted the case reopened after Duffy's testimony that “black ops group at Conservative headquarters” were behind the calls.

“They used robocalls to misdirect NDP voters, to split the vote and allow Gary Lunn to win,” Duffy testified. He said Lunn didn’t know about the effort.

The office of the Commissioner of Canada Elections investigated complaints about the calls, but failed to discover the source and said investigators couldn’t determine whether the calls had influenced anyone’s vote.

Last December, Duffy — who would be acquitted of 31 charges, many of them involving travel he billed to the Senate — described in court the rationale for a 2009 trip to help Lunn.

“He’d had a close call during the previous election, and it was only through the divine intervention of [late former senator and campaign manager] Doug Finley’s black ops group at Conservative headquarters that he managed to get himself re-elected,” Duffy reportedly told the court.

Lunn wasn’t involved, Duffy testified. “He knew nothing about it, except that they phoned him afterward and said ‘You’re welcome Gary.’ He said ‘What?’ [They said] ‘We got you in.’”

Following Duffy’s testimony, Lunn told the Canadian Press that he never knew who made the misleading calls and never told Duffy that it was Conservative headquarters.

Finley died in 2013 after a long battle with colorectal cancer.

Duffy did not respond to a request for an interview Wednesday.

No Investigation into Duffy’s Allegations of Election Fraud | The Tyee
 

Jinentonix

Hall of Fame Member
Sep 6, 2015
11,619
6,262
113
Olympus Mons
we do not have sophisticated voting public in Canada , just the brain washed.
Well that sure explains the last federal result. And it REALLY explains the last few Ontario results.

This is how stupid some Liberal voters are. There was a news report that got posted to FB about how Ontario's Grade 6 students were sucking hind *** in math. The ONLY party that owns that problem is the Liberals and I pointed it out.
Some Libtard supporter then tried to berate me by stating I'm "biased and obviously not too bright because the Liberals have been in power for less than a year." :lol::lol: