The ideologues have Ford.
That's all they need.
Nothing else matters. Not their principles. Not their credibility. Not the truth. Not the constituents. Not democracy.
Nothing.
Just attack Ford, at all costs.
To be honest Durka, I don't disagree with you.To be honest Bear, I hated Miller and Ford is basically the right wing version of him. It's the "my way or the highway attitude that plagued them both. Also, it's not just the left that has a problem with Ford, he's alienated the middle and some on the right. Toronto mayors are buffoons, regardless of their political sway.
To be honest Durka, I don't disagree with you.
But then again, you don't sell out your own principles to fabricate outrage, just because he isn't a Miller clone.
In short, YOU are not an ideologue.
I couldn't agree more. There's nothing like adding an extended dysfunctional family to the already dysfunctional family.Can't really win with any of them. I believe amalgamating all the Toronto councils was a big mistake. Too large of a city to be represented in the way it is now.
To be honest Bear, I hated Miller and Ford is basically the right wing version of him. It's the "my way or the highway attitude that plagued them both. Also, it's not just the left that has a problem with Ford, he's alienated the middle and some on the right. Toronto mayors are buffoons, regardless of their political sway.
The Usual Suspect and the rest of the ideologues, don't have any credibility.Certainly Ford has not exactly been model mayor material. He certainly has disappointed on some stuff. But attack him for when he does actually do something stupid not for failing to lose weight in a weight loss challenge or for recinding a stupid Miller law. Attacking on issue B when you have an issue with him on issue A loses any credibility you have on issue A.
The Usual Suspect and the rest of the ideologues, don't have any credibility.
Certainly Ford has not exactly been model mayor material. He certainly has disappointed on some stuff. But attack him for when he does actually do something stupid not for failing to lose weight in a weight loss challenge or for recinding a stupid Miller law. Attacking on issue B when you have an issue with him on issue A loses any credibility you have on issue A.
Based on what? There are products out there that biodegrade in weeks as opposed to years, if that's what the consumer wants.