Yes Genocide does fit the bill - But when it is perpetrated on a small scale as it is in many countries, over an extended period of time, decades - The world looks away - I mean the West in particular - The selection by an Iranian Police official to bring charges against a small number of Bahia with the resulting tortured confession, show trials, long prison term or execution would not meet the broad standards that are defined by Genocide. yet the practice of terrorizing Bahia - Heretics according to the Shia faith and Govt - If you can as is happening in the Mid East in particular, convince many to emigrate over decades, by the use of what I have described in the thread topic, I do not believe it would meet the standards of Genocide - It would be impossible to prove in a Court of Law -
Oh come on. While I do agree that we have to do something to protect the oppressed in these countries, I think it's a little rich of us to not criticize ourselves at the same time. For crying out loud, just last provincial election, the issue of discrimination in the school system came up, and those candidates who stood up to it stood not a chance. The party that won the most seats was the one that had defended the injustice most vocally. Those who voted for them are now the same ones screaming about injustices abroad. Just a little rich, don't you think? Oh yes, and we're still occupying native lands that don't belong to us as per treaty. But let's stay mum on that, shall we.
Let's put it this way: while I can agree with what you say in principle, how about we be equally critical of ourselves. In other words, criticism of other countries should not come at the expense of living up to human rights standards at home. Also, pointing to worse offenses abroad does not sanctify our lesser offenses at home, especially when the population overwhelmingly and democraticaly efends these injustices!
Now just to clarify: if we had the support of the international community behind us to fight a legal war against Iran for its human rights violations, and that this war would be careful not to hurt my friends in Iran (I have many Baha'i friends, and they have family members in Iran, capich, so it's a little more personal for me there), I could certainly go for it. With international backing and UN approval, we could ensure a much wider international support for the war, thus preventing Iran from finding allies, sympathisers, or neutral states ready to defend it or at least turn a blind eye. This would mean the entire world would permit this war against Iran and would respect any sanction against it, just as was the case with Afghanistan. However, it would have to be a war directed specifically against the government and not the people, and with a clear exit stratey at the beginning. Again, I'm not opposed to the idea as long as it's a just war and a legal war in the eyes of international law.
What pisses me off though is how Canadians can so smugly cry out against injustices abroad and then actively support, promote and defend them in our own laws and constitution. It's makes a hypocrite of our country.