Refugee/Migrant Crisis

spaminator

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 26, 2009
39,914
3,759
113
False asylum claims drive refugee health-care program toward $1B price tag
In 2016, the Interim Federal Health Program cost $60M, covering just over 16,000 claimants. This year, roughly 600,000 people are covered — pushing costs to nearly $1B.


Author of the article:Brian Lilley
Published Feb 12, 2026 • Last updated 21 hours ago • 3 minute read

Roxham Road
Workers demolish the temporary installation for refugee claimants at Roxham Road in St. Bernard-de-Lacolle, Que., Monday, Sept. 25, 2023. Photo by Ryan Remiorz /THE CANADIAN PRESS
A federal program to provide health care to refugees and asylum claimants that a decade ago cost just $60 million a year is expected to cost taxpayers close to $1 billion this year. And according to the Parliamentary Budget Officer, the program will cost more than $1.5 billion annually by the end of the decade.


The sharp spike in costs is the result of the Liberals making the program more generous and the out-of-control increase in asylum claims – most of them false.


Costs soar as asylum claims skyrocket
Back in 2016, the Interim Federal Health Program cost taxpayers just $60 million annually. At that point in time there were just over 16,000 people who had claimed asylum in Canada.

Fast forward to 2024, the last year where full stats are available, and 190,000 people were claiming asylum in Canada. In addition, as of late last year, there was a backlog of unheard claims totalling more than 250,000 people.

The review of the IFHP conducted by the Parliamentary Budget Officer finds that this year there are roughly 600,000 people covered by the program — more than two thirds of them are asylum claimants.

Who is covered under the IFHP?
This program covers overseas settled refugees — these are people brought to Canada from refugee camps around the world to be resettled. This is the smallest group covered by this program and has been for years.


The next group covered are known as “in-Canada resettled refugees,” essentially people allowed into Canada based on persecution in their home country. It can be for factors such as race, religion, political opinion, sexual orientation, and other factors.

The vast majority of those in the asylum claim stream arrived in Canada in one way or another and then claimed asylum. Many flew to Canada thanks to the lack of visa requirements and then claimed asylum once they landed. Others came to Canada on student or temporary work visas and then claimed asylum.

Canada’s lax visa policies drive surge in claims
Canada’s system doesn’t allow for claims to be automatically dismissed based on where the claimant is coming from, we need to treat all claims the same until the hearing.

That’s why in 2025 we had close to 500 Americans declare asylum in Canada. Don’t think it’s all Donald Trump — we had 328 American cases pending at the end of 2024 during the Joe Biden era, but regardless of who is president, we shouldn’t treat American asylum claims as serious.


Same with the 12,891 claims from Mexico in 2024, a number that dropped to just over 4,000 when visa requirements were reinstated.

We had 32,563 Indian nationals declare asylum in Canada in 2024, and at the end of 2025 there is a backlog of roughly 44,000 asylum claims from India. That’s a small city of people from India, a fellow democracy with a growing economy, suddenly declaring asylum.

It didn’t used to be this way.

A decade ago, under the Stephen Harper government, there would be a few hundred Indian nationals per year claiming asylum. It grew to a few thousand a year and then spiked in 2023 as Indian nationals who had come to Canada on student and work visas began declaring asylum rather than go home.

Taxpayers foot the bill
There are real refugees in the world and that is why we have our refugee and asylum system. It is not meant to be abused by people who don’t want to be bothered following the usual immigration rules, yet too often, that is the case today.


And it is you, the taxpayer, who is footing the bill for this through programs like the Interim Federal Health Program, and others, that tens of thousands of people are now taking advantage of for their own benefit.

The Mark Carney Liberals are talking about tinkering with the program to reduce costs. They want to begin asking for a 30% co-pay for services such as dental care, eye care, and mental health services, programs many Canadians don’t get covered at all under their government plan.

Instead of tinkering at the edges, the smart thing to do would be to get the asylum program back on track and stop allowing tens of thousands of people to abuse it each year.

That’s a sure way to reduce costs and put faith back in the system.

blilley@postmedia.com
 
  • Like
Reactions: Taxslave2

Dixie Cup

Senate Member
Sep 16, 2006
6,539
4,124
113
Edmonton
False asylum claims drive refugee health-care program toward $1B price tag
In 2016, the Interim Federal Health Program cost $60M, covering just over 16,000 claimants. This year, roughly 600,000 people are covered — pushing costs to nearly $1B.


Author of the article:Brian Lilley
Published Feb 12, 2026 • Last updated 21 hours ago • 3 minute read

Roxham Road
Workers demolish the temporary installation for refugee claimants at Roxham Road in St. Bernard-de-Lacolle, Que., Monday, Sept. 25, 2023. Photo by Ryan Remiorz /THE CANADIAN PRESS
A federal program to provide health care to refugees and asylum claimants that a decade ago cost just $60 million a year is expected to cost taxpayers close to $1 billion this year. And according to the Parliamentary Budget Officer, the program will cost more than $1.5 billion annually by the end of the decade.


The sharp spike in costs is the result of the Liberals making the program more generous and the out-of-control increase in asylum claims – most of them false.


Costs soar as asylum claims skyrocket
Back in 2016, the Interim Federal Health Program cost taxpayers just $60 million annually. At that point in time there were just over 16,000 people who had claimed asylum in Canada.

Fast forward to 2024, the last year where full stats are available, and 190,000 people were claiming asylum in Canada. In addition, as of late last year, there was a backlog of unheard claims totalling more than 250,000 people.

The review of the IFHP conducted by the Parliamentary Budget Officer finds that this year there are roughly 600,000 people covered by the program — more than two thirds of them are asylum claimants.

Who is covered under the IFHP?
This program covers overseas settled refugees — these are people brought to Canada from refugee camps around the world to be resettled. This is the smallest group covered by this program and has been for years.


The next group covered are known as “in-Canada resettled refugees,” essentially people allowed into Canada based on persecution in their home country. It can be for factors such as race, religion, political opinion, sexual orientation, and other factors.

The vast majority of those in the asylum claim stream arrived in Canada in one way or another and then claimed asylum. Many flew to Canada thanks to the lack of visa requirements and then claimed asylum once they landed. Others came to Canada on student or temporary work visas and then claimed asylum.

Canada’s lax visa policies drive surge in claims
Canada’s system doesn’t allow for claims to be automatically dismissed based on where the claimant is coming from, we need to treat all claims the same until the hearing.

That’s why in 2025 we had close to 500 Americans declare asylum in Canada. Don’t think it’s all Donald Trump — we had 328 American cases pending at the end of 2024 during the Joe Biden era, but regardless of who is president, we shouldn’t treat American asylum claims as serious.


Same with the 12,891 claims from Mexico in 2024, a number that dropped to just over 4,000 when visa requirements were reinstated.

We had 32,563 Indian nationals declare asylum in Canada in 2024, and at the end of 2025 there is a backlog of roughly 44,000 asylum claims from India. That’s a small city of people from India, a fellow democracy with a growing economy, suddenly declaring asylum.

It didn’t used to be this way.

A decade ago, under the Stephen Harper government, there would be a few hundred Indian nationals per year claiming asylum. It grew to a few thousand a year and then spiked in 2023 as Indian nationals who had come to Canada on student and work visas began declaring asylum rather than go home.

Taxpayers foot the bill
There are real refugees in the world and that is why we have our refugee and asylum system. It is not meant to be abused by people who don’t want to be bothered following the usual immigration rules, yet too often, that is the case today.


And it is you, the taxpayer, who is footing the bill for this through programs like the Interim Federal Health Program, and others, that tens of thousands of people are now taking advantage of for their own benefit.

The Mark Carney Liberals are talking about tinkering with the program to reduce costs. They want to begin asking for a 30% co-pay for services such as dental care, eye care, and mental health services, programs many Canadians don’t get covered at all under their government plan.

Instead of tinkering at the edges, the smart thing to do would be to get the asylum program back on track and stop allowing tens of thousands of people to abuse it each year.

That’s a sure way to reduce costs and put faith back in the system.

blilley@postmedia.com
And Canadians wonder why our healthcare system is failing dramatically. It was bad enough B4 excess immigrants came to our shores/crossed the border. Now it's on a deathbed!! Oh gee, what to do....
 
  • Like
Reactions: Taxslave2

pgs

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 29, 2008
28,983
8,392
113
B.C.
And Canadians wonder why our healthcare system is failing dramatically. It was bad enough B4 excess immigrants came to our shores/crossed the border. Now it's on a deathbed!! Oh gee, what to do....
Import more temporary workers of course .
 

Dixie Cup

Senate Member
Sep 16, 2006
6,539
4,124
113
Edmonton
The fact that the feds are in charge of healthcare funding, but the provinces are the ones implementing it, seems contra intuitive. I mean, the feds can do what they want & the provinces are stuck with what they get.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Taxslave2

petros

The Central Scrutinizer
Nov 21, 2008
119,782
14,784
113
Low Earth Orbit
And Canadians wonder why our healthcare system is failing dramatically. It was bad enough B4 excess immigrants came to our shores/crossed the border. Now it's on a deathbed!! Oh gee, what to do....
Biggest part of the problem is the term "free healthcare" not immigrants.Both users and providers have that bullshit front and center.

Shit hit the fan long before immigration upticks. Waaaaay before. Like 1980s before.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dixie Cup

pgs

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 29, 2008
28,983
8,392
113
B.C.
Biggest part of the problem is the term "free healthcare" not immigrants.Both users and providers have that bullshit front and center.

Shit hit the fan long before immigration upticks. Waaaaay before. Like 1980s before.
Like before 1970’s
 
  • Like
Reactions: Taxslave2

Ron in Regina

"Voice of the West" Party
Apr 9, 2008
31,463
11,424
113
Regina, Saskatchewan
Irfan Ahmad arrived in Canada under the “convention refugee abroad” program in 2014, citing his status as a member of the Ahmadi community, a persecuted Muslim minority group in Pakistan.

However, since attaining refugee status, immigration authorities found that Ahmad twice visited the Pakistani consulate in Toronto, both times to receive a passport. Between January 2016 and March 2022, Ahmad returned to Pakistan six times, spending 336 days in the country, the ruling notes.

The RPD, a division of the Immigration Refugee Board of Canada, found Ahmad “voluntarily re-availed himself of the protection of Pakistan” and “had not provided sufficient evidence to rebut the presumption,” the judgment reads. The tribunal found Ahmad’s description “of the agents of persecution ‘evolved depending on his audience,’” shifting between fear of religious extremists and government authorities on different occasions. The RPD found his statements to be inconsistent.

On February 18, Justice Avvy Yao-Yao Go ruled in favour of Ahmad, arguing that the RPD found inconsistencies “where none existed.” The judge added that the tribunal “compounded this error by failing to consider a key precautionary measure that the applicant took against the religious extremists while in Pakistan,” when Ahmad avoided going to a mosque.
 

spaminator

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 26, 2009
39,914
3,759
113
Police probing death of nearly blind refugee after he was dropped off at a Tim Hortons in Buffalo
His body was found five days after U.S. Border Patrol agents left him at a downtown coffee shop

Author of the article:Ling Hui
Published Feb 26, 2026 • Last updated 16 hours ago • 2 minute read

A U.S. Border Patrol agent stands along the boundary marker cut into the forest marking the line between Canadian territory on the right and the United States in Vermont.
A U.S. Border Patrol agent stands along the boundary marker cut into the forest marking the line between Canadian territory on the right and the United States in Vermont. Photo by Joe Raedle /Getty Images
Police are investigating the death of a nearly blind refugee from Myanmar who disappeared after he was released by U.S. Border Patrol agents in Buffalo.


Nurul Amin Shah Alam, 56, was detained by U.S. Border Patrol agents on Feb. 19 and released the same day after spending a year in a county jail, awaiting trial on criminal charges that resulted in a misdemeanour plea deal.


Federal authorities had determined he wasn’t eligible for deportation and dropped him off at a Tim Hortons in downtown Buffalo.

Buffalo Police Department said his body was found Tuesday night near KeyBank Center, the downtown arena where the Buffalo Sabres play.

It was unclear how he got there from the Tim Hortons or when he died.

Mayor slams U.S. Border Patrol agent
Buffalo’s Mayor Sean Ryan, a Democrat, said his death was preventable and that federal agents shouldn’t have left him alone, miles from his home.


“A vulnerable man — nearly blind and unable to speak English — was left alone on a cold winter night with no known attempt to leave him in a safe, secure location. That decision from U.S. Customs and Border Protection was unprofessional and inhumane,” Ryan said in a statement posted online.

Ryan said the man had been wearing orange booties issued by the county holding centre.

U.S. Customs and Border Protection defended its actions in a statement, saying Shah Alam “showed no signs of distress, mobility issues, or disabilities requiring special assistance” when agents dropped him off at the coffee shop.

“Border Patrol agents offered him a courtesy ride, which he chose to accept to a coffee shop, determined to be a warm, safe location near his last known address, rather than be released directly from the Border Patrol station,” the agency said.


Family was waiting for him outside jail
His family had initially expected him to walk out of the county jail when he was released but reported him missing after failing to locate him after being informed of where he was dropped off.

Shah Alam arrived in the United States with his wife and two of his children in December 2024 in search of opportunity for his family, said Imran Fazal, who knows the family and founded a group called the Rohingya Empowerment Community. He had worked in construction for many years previously in Malaysia.

A year ago, he was arrested by Buffalo police over an incident that resulted in minor injuries to two officers.

He was initially indicted on charges of assault, burglary and criminal mischief, but he ended up pleading guilty to misdemeanour charges of trespassing and possession of a weapon, and was scheduled to be sentenced in March, the district attorney’s office said.

His family had posted bail and went to the county jail on Thursday, expecting Shah Alam to be released.

“The family was waiting in the waiting room,” Fazal said. “They were thinking he was just coming out.”

But since federal Border Patrol had lodged an immigration detainer after his arrest, the Erie County Sheriff’s Office followed standard practice and informed the federal agency about his pending release. The Border Patrol arrived at the jail before the release was finalized, according to a statement from the sheriff’s office.

— with files from the Associated Press
 

spaminator

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 26, 2009
39,914
3,759
113
Canadian man in ICE custody sick from contaminated water, poor food in Texas facility
Wright works in the oil and gas sector and is a permanent resident of the U.S.

Author of the article:Denette Wilford
Published Feb 27, 2026 • Last updated 18 hours ago • 3 minute read

Curtis Wright with his daughter pictured in this undated photo. Curtis a Canadian spent months in ICE detention after being arrested by Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents in Texas, even though he's lived in the United States for nearly 30 years. Photo by Kayla Thomsen /The Canadian Press
A Canadian man has been stuck in a detention facility in Texas for months after his arrest by Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents in November.


Kayla Thomsen says her fiancé, Curtis Wright, who was born in Edmonton, Alta., has lived in the United States for nearly 30 years.


But it will be four months next week that he has been detained at ICE’s South Texas Detention Facility in Pearsall, about 90 kilometres southwest of San Antonio, where he has been forced to endure cold, crowded conditions, poor food and water, and long delays to plead his case to a judge, Thomsen claimed.

Why was he detained?
On Nov. 6, Wright, 39, was returning home from a business trip in Mexico when Thomsen received a text from him that he had been taken aside for secondary screening at Houston’s Bush Intercontinental Airport.

“I had all the kids home, and they were so excited to see their dad. We had made dinner. We were all waiting for him,” the woman said.


After radio silence for a couple hours, Wright texted that he was being detained and sent to an ICE facility.

“The water is contaminated at the facility he’s at. He got extremely sick,” she told the Canadian Press.

“I didn’t know what was happening,” she continued. “In my head, I’m thinking he’s been locked up with rapists and murderers. So I was beside myself.”

Thomsen said her fiancé was detained for a drug possession conviction from when he was in high school. He had been in a car with friends and Xanax tablets were found in the back seat, she explained, but added that Wright did community service for his sentence.

Detainees like Wright can self-deport to their home country, Thomsen explained, but moving to Canada would jeopardize the custody he shares of his two sons from a previous marriage.


Wright works in the oil and gas sector and is a permanent resident of the U.S., Thomsen said.

They live in Houston with their 18-month-old daughter and Wright’s two boys.

Curtis Wright and his family pictured in this undated photo. Curtis a Canadian spent months in ICE detention after being arrested by Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents in Texas, even though he’s lived in the United States for nearly 30 years. Photo by Handout - Kayla Thomsen /THE CANADIAN PRESS
Why the delay?
He was supposed to have a virtual court date last month, Thomsen said, but the judge didn’t show up and another date was set — and another trial has yet to be scheduled and no one has answers on how long it will take.

The U.S. Department of Homeland Security did not respond to CP when asked about Wright’s case.

Wright has been moved to different facilities four times, according to Thomsen.

She said Wright has told her it’s cold, detainees have no blankets or jackets, and one of his so-called meals was one frozen waffle in a 24-hour period.

Thomsen is allowed to visit him, and she made the 400-kilometre trek once with their daughter, but won’t again.


“It’s hard to watch her try to grab at him through the glass, and she doesn’t know why she can’t get her dad, you know? And he’s visibly upset and crying because he’s missing his child,” Thomsen said.

“It’s hard on her. It’s hard on me. It’s heartbreaking to see.”


Past arrests
Thomsen revealed that Wright had previous run-ins with the law, including an arrest for impaired driving about eight years ago, and another when police found his ex-wife’s gun in a car during a traffic stop.

But he wasn’t convicted, Thomsen pointed out, and those incidents are not listed as reasons for his current detention.

Wright was also an alcoholic, but he has been sober for five years.

“The amount of men that he has helped and continues helping in Alcoholics Anonymous is amazing. I mean, he really does a lot for the community,” she added.

Thomsen said Wright has also been helping other detainees, adding they aren’t criminals either.

“It doesn’t matter if you’re on a work visa or a school visa or anything like that. They’re just taking everybody,” she said.

“It just doesn’t make any sense.”
 

spaminator

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 26, 2009
39,914
3,759
113
Laken Riley’s father files wrongful death lawsuit against Georgia university system
Laken was out for a run on the University of Georgia campus on Feb. 22, 2024 when Jose Ibarra attacked her

Author of the article:Denette Wilford
Published Feb 27, 2026 • Last updated 18 hours ago • 2 minute read

Laken Riley's parents Jason Riley (C) and Allyson Philips attend Republican presidential candidate and former U.S. President Donald Trump's campaign rally at the Forum River Center March 09, 2024 in Rome, Georgia.
Laken Riley's parents Jason Riley (C) and Allyson Philips attend Republican presidential candidate and former U.S. President Donald Trump's campaign rally at the Forum River Center March 09, 2024 in Rome, Georgia. Photo by Chip Somodevilla /Getty Images
The father of Laken Riley, who was killed on the campus of the University of Georgia in Athens by a Venezuelan man who lived nearby, is accusing the state university system of negligence that he says led to his daughter’s death.


Jason Riley filed a wrongful-death lawsuit against the Board of Regents of the University System of Georgia, as well as several property management companies.


Just over an hour before the 22-year-old nursing student was killed, Ibarra had looked into the window of a graduate student’s on-campus apartment and tried to open the front door before fleeing into a wooded area.

Laken Riley, allegedly killed by migrant while out for a run on University of Georgia campus on Feb. 22, 2024.
Laken Riley (Facebook) Photo by Laken Riley /Facebook
‘Failed in its duty’
The lawsuit filed Monday in Gwinnett County State Court alleges that the Board of Regents “failed in its duty to provide a reasonably safe premises” and failed to notify students and guests on campus of the threat posed by Ibarra that morning.

“Soon thereafter, with no knowledge of the potential assailant and no reason to suspect any danger, nursing student Laken Riley went for her routine morning run near the Intramural Fields on the UGA campus,” the lawsuit reads.


The suit also says the Board of Regents failed to follow its own policies and procedures on screening employees, which resulted in Ibarra’s brother — who, like Ibarra, was in the U.S. illegally — being employed on campus.

The suit also accuses the board of failing to monitor criminal activity on campus.

A Board of Regents spokesperson said the board does not comment on pending litigation.

What happened that fateful morning?
Laken attended Augusta University College of Nursing, which also has a campus in Athens. She was out for a run on the University of Georgia campus on Feb. 22, 2024 when Jose Ibarra tried to rape her.

The Tren de Aragua gangbanger smashed Riley’s head with a rock and asphyxiated her when she fought back.


Ibarra, 28, was convicted of murder and other charges and sentenced to life without parole last year.

Jose Ibarra appears in an Athens-Clark County courtroom, on January 30, 2026, in Athens, Georgia.
Jose Ibarra appears in an Athens-Clark County courtroom, on January 30, 2026, in Athens, Georgia. (Mike Stewart-Pool/Getty Images) Photo by Mike Stewart-Pool /Getty Images
How Riley became the face of immigration reform
Ibarra had entered the U.S. illegally in 2022 and was allowed to stay while he pursued his immigration case.

Riley’s lawsuit alleges negligence on the part of the property management for the apartment complex where Ibarra lived with other people, including two of his brothers.

It alleges the property manager “failed in its duty to properly screen prospective tenants” and allowed Ibarra to live there regardless of the fact that he was in the country illegally and had a criminal history.

Had the property manager “not permitted Ibarra to live in the Apartments in close proximity to the citizens of Athens and students of the University of Georgia, Ibarra would not have had the opportunity to assault and murder Ms. Riley in February 2024.”


The Laken Riley Act was the first piece of legislation President Donald Trump signed into law after returning to the White House.

The bill mandated the federal detention of illegal immigrants accused of burglary, theft, assaulting law enforcement officers, and other violent crimes.

Earlier this year, officials marked the act’s one-year anniversary by announcing that more than 20,000 illegal migrants that were either charged or convicted of crimes have been detained since the bill was signed into law.

Riley’s father is requesting a jury trial. He is seeking compensatory and punitive damages, as well as reimbursement of legal costs.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dixie Cup