RCMP raising concerns about Liberals' changes to criminal background checks - Politic

Colpy

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 5, 2005
21,887
847
113
69
Saint John, N.B.
The RCMP is taking issue with changes the Liberal government made to criminal background checks and the pardons system, pointing to cases of people with "disturbing" records applying to work with vulnerable individuals, CBC News has learned.
The force's concerns were summarized in a briefing note prepared by public safety staff to update Public Safety Minister Ralph Goodale on the changes to the system.
The issue is how criminal background checks conducted by police for people applying to work with individuals considered "vulnerable" — children and the elderly, for example — are handled in cases where a person has received a record suspension, commonly known as a pardon.
A record suspension helps give a past offender a clean slate when it comes to renting an apartment or applying for a job. But the offence isn't completely erased, just set aside. Criminal background checks required under vulnerable sector regulations do turn up those record suspensions, mainly previous sex offences.
The federal public safety minister has the final say when it comes to disclosing someone's past criminal record under vulnerable sector regulations — even if they've had an offence suspended.



The Criminal Records Act calls on the minister to take a number of factors into consideration in such cases, including whether the suspended offence involved violence, children or a breach of trust.
'Undeniably, these offences are disturbing.' - Memo to Public Safety Minister Ralph Goodale​
If the disclosure is approved, a copy of the suspended record is returned to the applicant and the police service that oversaw the request. If it's denied, the background check is returned as having found "no record."
Conservative government disclosed more

Starting in 2016, the Liberal government made changes to the process to weigh the act's provisions alongside new evidence and research.
Public safety officials prepared a briefing notefor Goodale on the status of the changes at the end of 2017. It says the government should take "into account current research findings demonstrating that sex offenders who have remained crime-free for 20 years or more have a similar or lower risk to reoffend than the general population."
Research also shows that sex offenders who were 24 years old and younger "could be considered immature at the time and less likely to reoffend," says the briefing note.
As a result of the changes, there have been fewer disclosures of pardoned criminal records under the Trudeau government.
Public Safety Minister Ralph Goodale has called the criminal pardons system 'punitive.' (Justin Tang/Canadian Press)

Former Conservative public safety minister Vic Toews delegated his signing power over to the department's director general of crime prevention in 2011.
"Between 2011 and 2015, almost all vulnerable sector requests seeking disclosure of a pardoned record were approved," the briefing note says. In 2015, for example, 95 per cent of all vulnerable sector disclosures were approved.
But in 2016, the year changes were made, only 38 per cent of disclosure requests were approved.
"The RCMP has expressed their concern with this approach," Goodale was told in the briefing note.
RCMP working to 'ensure the integrity' of system

For months, the RCMP have been sending Public Safety information to support approving more disclosures of suspended records. At one point, RCMP flagged three cases up for disclosure.
The details of the cases were redacted in the Access to Information Request, but Public Safety acknowledged their severity in the briefing note.
"Undeniably, these offences are disturbing and this information is important to have in assessing [vulnerable sector] disclosure requests," it reads.
Kim Pate, who has spent most her life fighting for the rights of women in prison, says background checks aren't the only way to stop abuse. (Colin Perkel/Canadian Press)

Despite flagging the issue to the department, the RCMP refused to comment on the specifics in the briefing note.
"The RCMP has provided Public Safety in the past further information on the nature of the offence with respect to individual cases. However, this type of information often does not reside in the RCMP's information holdings and may or may not still be held by the police service originally involved in the handling of the offence," said spokesperson Sgt. Marie Damian.
"The RCMP continues to work very closely with Public Safety to ensure the integrity of the vulnerable sector regime in the context of the privacy rights of Canadians and community safety."
A spokesperson for Goodale said the government's decision process still sticks to the criteria laid out in the Criminal Records Act.
"Vulnerable sector checks provide essential information to employers, school administrators and others responsible for vulnerable groups so that they can make good decisions about potential employees and volunteers. These checks help keep our most vulnerable safe," Scott Bardsley said.
"The RCMP has been providing additional information to better support these determinations."
Background checks not a catch-all: senator

Independent Sen. Kim Pate, the former head of the Canadian Association of Elizabeth Fry Societies, said background checks aren't the only way to protect daycares and nursing homes from those wishing to do harm.
"Of course we want to see protections. What we know, though, is criminal record checks (are) not the most effective way to prevent those kinds of abuses," she said.
"The majority of people who have committed offences, whether it's sexual offences or others, are in fact not even sometimes reported, certainly not prosecuted."
The Senate is reviewing Bill C-66, which gives the Parole Board of Canada jurisdiction to order, or refuse to order, the expungement of convictions for any of a list of past Criminal Code offences that includes gross indecency, buggery and anal intercourse. It was introduced when Prime Minister Justin Trudeau apologized to LGBT Canadians for "systematic oppression."
Pate said she's been talking about the need for a more robust conviction review scheme that would allow some convictions to expire.


RCMP raising concerns about Liberals' changes to criminal background checks - Politics - CBC News

This is insane!
The old system was bad enough.
When I was trainer for an armoured car company, I returned from a delivery run one day to be handed a list of new trainees. To my horror, on it was a guy I had known in my past .........a thief, a drug dealer (unconvicted), a guy who had served prison time for manslaughter, a violent individual.
He had obtained a pardon. He passed our background check.
I consulted with my boss, told him I refused to train him. He asked for a letter explaining my reluctance, so I gave him one. I only remember the last line.
"It is not a question if XXXXX will rob us with violence, it is only a question of when".
This is a job in which you are in contact with millions in cash, and always carry guns.
Now they have increased the erasure of records for employment inquiries?
Just insane.


We have got to get rid of the Liberals in 2019.
 

Decapoda

Council Member
Mar 4, 2016
1,682
801
113
This is just part of the Liberals overall strategy to be more "principled" when it comes to criminal reform. Apparently the past Conservative Government's move to bring in measures that hold criminals accountable was mean-spirited and punitive. Trudeau was very upfront during the last election campaign that he would undo this apparent social travesty.

Liberal justice: Experts expect less punitive, more principled approach to crime

Under Stephen Harper's watch, Canada underwent a fundamental shift from being a principled, human rights-based system to an "ideological grab bag of repression and meanness," Campbell said. The system moved from an international model to one "swimming against the tide."

"The Conservatives had a bit of a vision, but it was just a sentiment of nastiness"


This is how Liberals apparently view accountability...something that is repressing, mean and nasty. Maybe this is why Trudeau has such a difficult time taking personal accountability for any of his actions....perhaps he's freeing himself from repression.
 

bill barilko

Senate Member
Mar 4, 2009
5,868
493
83
Vancouver-by-the-Sea
A record suspension helps give a past offender a clean slate when it comes to renting an apartment
Ummm....No-no one undergoes a record check when renting an apartment this article is full of factual errors and should be considered worth the paper it's written on.
 

Hoid

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 15, 2017
20,408
3
36
The only possible way to get rid of the Liberals in 2019 would be to elect a liberal/Green/NDP coalition led by the NDP.

The Conservatives are unelectable.
 

pgs

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 29, 2008
26,663
6,998
113
B.C.
The only possible way to get rid of the Liberals in 2019 would be to elect a liberal/Green/NDP coalition led by the NDP.

The Conservatives are unelectable.
OK You an vote for wh9 you want .
 

Hoid

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 15, 2017
20,408
3
36
Also in terms of pardons you can be completely pardoned in Canada of something like a marijuana possession charge as a 16 year old, and have it expunged from your record, and still have it prevent you from entering the USA.

The US government has all our criminal records and they do not expunge them.

Thank you Steven Harper.
 

Curious Cdn

Hall of Fame Member
Feb 22, 2015
37,070
6
36
. It says the government should take "into account current research findings demonstrating that sex offenders who have remained crime-free for 20 years or more have a similar or lower risk to reoffend than the general population."

Whether that is true or not and personally doubt that it is correct, we have no business as a society taking the chance that a couple of researchers might have misinterpreted their data. The consequences of letting sex offenders near the vulnerable are too grave and the gamble is too great.

Why would a supposedly "reformed" sex offender seek out having a PRC, anyway? What "right" do they believe is being infringed by being kept away from those that they used to target for sexual exploitation?

Not buying this. The government must re-think.
 

pgs

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 29, 2008
26,663
6,998
113
B.C.
Also in terms of pardons you can be completely pardoned in Canada of something like a marijuana possession charge as a 16 year old, and have it expunged from your record, and still have it prevent you from entering the USA.

The US government has all our criminal records and they do not expunge them.

Thank you Steven Harper.
Yet we are legalizing marijuana with one of the reasons being young people being stigmasized for life due to drug charges at the same time trying to criminalize the use of marijuana in certain circumstances , which in effect will criminalize a different group of people .

. It says the government should take "into account current research findings demonstrating that sex offenders who have remained crime-free for 20 years or more have a similar or lower risk to reoffend than the general population."

Whether that is true or not and personally doubt that it is correct, we have no business as a society taking the chance that a couple of researchers might have misinterpreted their data. The consequences of letting sex offenders near the vulnerable are too grave and the gamble is too great.

Why would a supposedly "reformed" sex offender seek out having a PRC, anyway? What "right" do they believe is being infringed by being kept away from those that they used to target for sexual exploitation?

Not buying this. The government must re-think.
Wacktheir peepee .
 

White_Unifier

Senate Member
Feb 21, 2017
7,300
2
36
I remember watching a documentary showing how many US child molesters, after being released from prison, are forced to transfer to a mental-health hospital where they must prove that they are reformed before they can gain release. Some have undergone chemical or even surgical castration to try to prove themselves, and even then they are sometimes denied release if they don't actively participate in group therapy since the medical staff recognize that even castration itself, while it might help and significantly reduces the risk, does not guarantee that the offender won't re-offend.

It would seem reasonable to me that for child molestation and certain other types of sex crimes, that the offender must agree to surgical castration and at least one year of individual or group therapy as a prerequisite for release.

I can certainly sympathize with a pedophile, with his spiritual struggles and the discrimination he might face even though he might not have hurt anyone, and I do think we need to empathize more with them.

That said, there's a whole world of difference between pedophilia and child molestation. Pedophilia just occurs in a person's head and heart, child molestation translates that into the physical world to hurt another person.

If a woman molests a boy, she should be released only on condition that she agree to surgical castration too.

Beyond that, rather than shame a non-molesting pedophile, we should applaud his honesty and effort in seeking the therapy he needs before he molests. But again, once he or she molests, the rules change.