Quit picking on Obama……

Walter

Hall of Fame Member
Jan 28, 2007
34,888
126
63
While many right wing delusionals continue to call Obama the ''food stamp president", the fact remains that more Americans got food stamps under Bush than under him:
BHO says the economy has improved during his tyranny. If things have improved why are more people than ever using SNAP (food stamps)?
 

EagleSmack

Hall of Fame Member
Feb 16, 2005
44,168
96
48
USA
Funny how the forum right wingers eagerly endorse fact check when its numbers attack Obama but not when they support him.

The Broken Record card never stops playing here ....


Funny how there are more people on food stamps under Obama than ever before.


Just the facts
 

gopher

Hall of Fame Member
Jun 26, 2005
21,513
66
48
Minnesota: Gopher State
and just the facts says it was your hero Bush

by the way, corporate welfare in the form of war profits from Bush's two wars exceed the numbers paid off in food stamps



BROKENRECORDBROKENRECORDBROKENRECORD
 

EagleSmack

Hall of Fame Member
Feb 16, 2005
44,168
96
48
USA
 

pgs

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 29, 2008
28,534
8,139
113
B.C.
and just the facts says it was your hero Bush

by the way, corporate welfare in the form of war profits from Bush's two wars exceed the numbers paid off in food stamps



BROKENRECORDBROKENRECORDBROKENRECORD
How much corporate welfare is going out covering Obama's seven wars ?
 

gopher

Hall of Fame Member
Jun 26, 2005
21,513
66
48
Minnesota: Gopher State
How much corporate welfare is going out covering Obama's seven wars ?


Seven? Some of your fellow right wing pals want more war in Syria & other parts of that region. In fact they blame ISIS's rise to Obama because he supposedly did nothing to stop them.


As for food stamps, as I wrote before "14.7 million were added to the rolls during his time in office, and 14.3 million were added during Obama’s" - Obama’s Numbers (April 2015 Update)


In other words, the number are "higher" under Obama because they have been added to Bush's numbers because those people remain in the SNAP program.


BROKEN RECORD, reprise
 

tay

Hall of Fame Member
May 20, 2012
11,548
1
36
President Obama Demands Critics Tell Him What's Wrong With TPP; Of Course We Can't Do That Because He Won't Show Us The Agreement






President Obama is apparently quite annoyed by the fact that his own party is basically pushing against his "big trade deals" (that are not really about trade). Senator Elizabeth Warren has been pretty aggressive in trashing the TPP agreement, highlighting the fact that the agreement is still secret (other than the bits leaked by Wikileaks). In response, President Obama came out swinging against the critics of TPP arguing that "they don't know what they're talking about."

He insists that it's unfair to compare TPP to NAFTA because they're different deals:
“You need to tell me what’s wrong with this trade agreement, not one that was passed 25 years ago.”
Well, Mr. President, I would love to do that, but I can't because you and your USTR haven't released the damn text. It takes an insane lack of self-awareness for the guy who once declared his administration "the most transparent in history" to demand people tell him what's wrong with his trade agreement, when that agreement is kept entirely secret.

Furthermore, multiple experts concerning things like the corporate sovereignty ISDS provisions and the intellectual property chapters have gone into great detail as to why the leaked versions have problems. They're not complaining about NAFTA. They're actually complaining about the latest drafts -- but the USTR won't acknowledge them because they're talking about leaked versions.


I'm a critic. I can't walk over today and read the text of the agreement. Obviously, President Obama is only talking about elected members of Congress. But that's not what they're complaining about. They're complaining about the fact that the American public cannot see the text of the document or discuss the specifics of what's in there. And that's absolutely true.

And even the fact that members of Congress can actually see the document is tremendously misleading. Yes, members of Congress are allowed to walk over to the USTR and see a copy of the latest text. But they're not allowed to take any notes, make any copies or bring any of their staff members. In other words, they can only read the document and keep what they remember in their heads. And they can't have their staff members -- the folks who often really understand the details -- there to explain what's really going on.

And it all comes back to the point that Senator Warren has been making for a long time: that former USTR Ron Kirk has admitted that a big reason why they keep the document secret is that when they tried being more transparent in the past, the agreement failed. As Warren says, if being transparent with the American public means the agreement will fail, then the problem is with the agreement, not the public.


Here's a little test: can we see the current TPP documents today? No? Then it's secret. Claiming otherwise is what's dishonest.




https://www.techdirt.com/articles/2...-that-because-he-wont-show-us-agreement.shtml
 

pgs

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 29, 2008
28,534
8,139
113
B.C.
Seven? Some of your fellow right wing pals want more war in Syria & other parts of that region. In fact they blame ISIS's rise to Obama because he supposedly did nothing to stop them.


As for food stamps, as I wrote before "14.7 million were added to the rolls during his time in office, and 14.3 million were added during Obama’s" - Obama’s Numbers (April 2015 Update)


In other words, the number are "higher" under Obama because they have been added to Bush's numbers because those people remain in the SNAP program.


BROKEN RECORD, reprise
I don't want any wars . Period .
So Bush had America involved in four wars . Obama has America involved in seven but you still blame Bush and republicans .
Talk about broken records .
 

gopher

Hall of Fame Member
Jun 26, 2005
21,513
66
48
Minnesota: Gopher State
I don't want any wars . Period .
So Bush had America involved in four wars . Obama has America involved in seven but you still blame Bush and republicans .
Talk about broken records .



I don't want any wars at all and said from the beginning that we had no business being there or even attempting to expand the wars that exist there. The instability in Iraq occurred because of Bush, not Obama as you and everyone else knows. Blaming Obama for that or for ISIS or for the long existing problem in Yemen is the same old horseshtt broken record.