Re: Quebec %^$@&$
It's bad because people don't like to be referred to anything lower than the level of humans. You get the feeling that you're inferior when you are called something like that. Most people don't make the connection that a frog used to be the symbol of French royalty or whatever.
I think when person A calls person B an XYZ, then person B automatically makes a comparison with XYZ and him/herself based on the cultural views on XYZ. If it is deemed that XYZ is lower/inferior/contrary to what they current think of themselves, the comment that person A made will come across as negative.
That's why, in NA at least, people don't like to be to be called a dog, a chicken, a rat, a snake, a cow, a roach... I could go on... easy.
But, evidently, if you call someone a god...
DasFX said:If so, then why is it bad? However I thought the rooster was that symbol?
It's bad because people don't like to be referred to anything lower than the level of humans. You get the feeling that you're inferior when you are called something like that. Most people don't make the connection that a frog used to be the symbol of French royalty or whatever.
I think when person A calls person B an XYZ, then person B automatically makes a comparison with XYZ and him/herself based on the cultural views on XYZ. If it is deemed that XYZ is lower/inferior/contrary to what they current think of themselves, the comment that person A made will come across as negative.
That's why, in NA at least, people don't like to be to be called a dog, a chicken, a rat, a snake, a cow, a roach... I could go on... easy.
But, evidently, if you call someone a god...