Please, look this picture.
- Thread starter socratus
- Start date
'Gentlemen, start your engines, the Demo Derby has began.
Infinity defies human capacity.
My conclusion:
1 - gravity is the weakest ''force'' in nature
2 - gravity is about 10^36 times weaker than EM force
3 - ''gravitational waves'' distort space only by about a factor of 10^-20
4 - gravity is only a local effect in the universe
5 - the concept ''Gravity'' cannot be used to the universe as whole
(for example:
Gravity cannot gather all matter of universe into ''singular point'' for
''big-bang'' as ''modern philosophy of science'' teach us today)
========
1 - gravity is the weakest ''force'' in nature
2 - gravity is about 10^36 times weaker than EM force
3 - ''gravitational waves'' distort space only by about a factor of 10^-20
4 - gravity is only a local effect in the universe
5 - the concept ''Gravity'' cannot be used to the universe as whole
(for example:
Gravity cannot gather all matter of universe into ''singular point'' for
''big-bang'' as ''modern philosophy of science'' teach us today)
========
GRT - 1915 / my opinion /
===
The basis of modern cosmology is Einstein's GRT
GRT equations predict:
1- in the early moment the entire universe was contained in
a ''singularity'', where the mass was enormous, the volume was zero,
the density was infinite.
2 - somehow this ''singularity'' was ''expanded'' to the sizes of a star
3- the gravity-masses of star distorted the absolute ''spacetime'' of the universe.
4 - the quantum particles change their straight way moving near star's masses.
5 - all billion stars in billion galaxies obey Einstein's ''GRT'' scheme.
6 - all billion and billion galaxies are only about 5% of all mass/energy
in the absolute ''spacetime'' continuum.
======
===
The basis of modern cosmology is Einstein's GRT
GRT equations predict:
1- in the early moment the entire universe was contained in
a ''singularity'', where the mass was enormous, the volume was zero,
the density was infinite.
2 - somehow this ''singularity'' was ''expanded'' to the sizes of a star
3- the gravity-masses of star distorted the absolute ''spacetime'' of the universe.
4 - the quantum particles change their straight way moving near star's masses.
5 - all billion stars in billion galaxies obey Einstein's ''GRT'' scheme.
6 - all billion and billion galaxies are only about 5% of all mass/energy
in the absolute ''spacetime'' continuum.
======
If everything was started from ''singularity'' then we need
to pay more attention on concept ''singularity''.
#
''Singularity'' is not only ''a point''.
''Singularity'' is also ''a place''.
''A place'' where the mass is enormous, the volume is zero,
the density is infinite, and the time is zero.
Somehow this ''singularity place'' was ''expanded''
Who ''expanded'' this ''singularity place'' ?
In my opinion, it can be only a Zero point energy.
======
to pay more attention on concept ''singularity''.
#
''Singularity'' is not only ''a point''.
''Singularity'' is also ''a place''.
''A place'' where the mass is enormous, the volume is zero,
the density is infinite, and the time is zero.
Somehow this ''singularity place'' was ''expanded''
Who ''expanded'' this ''singularity place'' ?
In my opinion, it can be only a Zero point energy.
======
We know.
===
1 - we know: the early universe started from '' a hot singularity'',
where mass is enormous, the volume zero, the density infinite
and time is zero.
2 - we know: more than 95% of substance in the universe is a
dark energy / matter.
3 - we know : only about 5% of matter is contained in a ''big bang''
4 - we know: ''a hot singularity'' (with less than 5% of matter in
the universe) is a basis for modern philosophy of science.
5 - we know: psychologists tell us we use only about 10%
of our brain power.
6 - we can understand : ≈ 10% of our brain power can discover
only less than 5% of matter in the universe
7 - we know: modern scientific / philosophical knowledge
doesn't obey our everyday common logic.
======
===
1 - we know: the early universe started from '' a hot singularity'',
where mass is enormous, the volume zero, the density infinite
and time is zero.
2 - we know: more than 95% of substance in the universe is a
dark energy / matter.
3 - we know : only about 5% of matter is contained in a ''big bang''
4 - we know: ''a hot singularity'' (with less than 5% of matter in
the universe) is a basis for modern philosophy of science.
5 - we know: psychologists tell us we use only about 10%
of our brain power.
6 - we can understand : ≈ 10% of our brain power can discover
only less than 5% of matter in the universe
7 - we know: modern scientific / philosophical knowledge
doesn't obey our everyday common logic.
======
Last edited:
I know.
===
1 - i know: Newton's gravity describes that two objects with mass
feel toward each other.
2 - i know: Einstein's gravity describes that a single object with mass
distorts the space and time around it in such a way that causes
light in the vicinity to curve toward that object.
3 - i know: Newton's and Einstein's matter are less than 5% in the universe
4 - i know: these ≈ 5% of matter can bend only ≈ 5% of universe's space
5 - i know: the rest space of the universe (+ 95%) is flat continuum.
6 - i know: this simple arithmetic is hard to adopt.
============
===
1 - i know: Newton's gravity describes that two objects with mass
feel toward each other.
2 - i know: Einstein's gravity describes that a single object with mass
distorts the space and time around it in such a way that causes
light in the vicinity to curve toward that object.
3 - i know: Newton's and Einstein's matter are less than 5% in the universe
4 - i know: these ≈ 5% of matter can bend only ≈ 5% of universe's space
5 - i know: the rest space of the universe (+ 95%) is flat continuum.
6 - i know: this simple arithmetic is hard to adopt.
============
Attachments
-
FLAT.jpg
Gravity: Spinning Galaxies and Dark Matter
==
Measurements showed that the galaxies were spinning
faster than was predicted by how many stars they contemned.
In other words, the stars should be flying off the edges of the
galaxies -- the gravity law should not be working.
In order to explain the high rotation speed (and save the gravity law
in each galaxy) astronomers needed to add a huge amount of
''dark matter'' to each galaxy in their calculation so all the stars
held together.
Dark matter helps normal matter clump together.
Dark matter saves gravity law in each galaxy.
Without dark matter gravity law doesn't work in galaxy.
#
Question remains: what is dark matter made of ?
Short answer: we have no idea.
=========
==
Measurements showed that the galaxies were spinning
faster than was predicted by how many stars they contemned.
In other words, the stars should be flying off the edges of the
galaxies -- the gravity law should not be working.
In order to explain the high rotation speed (and save the gravity law
in each galaxy) astronomers needed to add a huge amount of
''dark matter'' to each galaxy in their calculation so all the stars
held together.
Dark matter helps normal matter clump together.
Dark matter saves gravity law in each galaxy.
Without dark matter gravity law doesn't work in galaxy.
#
Question remains: what is dark matter made of ?
Short answer: we have no idea.
=========
Attachments
-
Galaxy.jpg
Empty space cannot be expanded distorted packaged painted illuminated, time is an unmovable concept. Please define gravity, in english, don,t use any knumbers.
16:58
Dark matter is needed to add so all the stars held together.
Dark matter helps normal matter clump together.
Dark matter saves gravity law in each galaxy.
Without dark matter gravity law doesn't work in galaxy.
#
In other words, there are two kinds of gravity in each galaxy:
a) normal (Newton - Einstein ) matter gravity and
b) dark matter gravity.
Dark matter gravity supports keep balance of matter in
each gravity system.
=====
Big Bang Dead – Electric Dark Matter to the Rescue? | Space News
: Astrophysicists today are resorting to new conjectures to try to preserve the big bang story. The latest irreconcilable data comes from scientists’ attempt to analyze the so-called Cosmic Dawn, a period about 200 million years after the Universe’s hypothetical beginning when the earliest stars are thought to have started …
Continue reading
sschirott June 12, 2018 multimedia Dark Matter? No. Birkeland Currents? Yes! | Space News
In our previous episode, we introduced a potential scientific breakthrough that could have profound implications for all of cosmology, eliminating the perceived need for dark matter. In a new scientific paper entitled Birkeland Currents and Dark Matter, scheduled for publication in April of this year, Dr. Donald E. Scott proposes …
Continue reading
sschirott February 22, 2018 multimedia Forecast Gets Darker for Dark Matter | Space News
In this episode, physicist Eugene Bagashov analyzes additional recent studies that raise even further doubt of the dark matter hypothesis, and he explores the growing scientific case for dark matter alternatives. In a recent Space News episode, we reported on two 2016 scientific studies that each serve potentially fatal blows …
Continue reading
: Astrophysicists today are resorting to new conjectures to try to preserve the big bang story. The latest irreconcilable data comes from scientists’ attempt to analyze the so-called Cosmic Dawn, a period about 200 million years after the Universe’s hypothetical beginning when the earliest stars are thought to have started …Continue reading
sschirott June 12, 2018 multimedia Dark Matter? No. Birkeland Currents? Yes! | Space News
In our previous episode, we introduced a potential scientific breakthrough that could have profound implications for all of cosmology, eliminating the perceived need for dark matter. In a new scientific paper entitled Birkeland Currents and Dark Matter, scheduled for publication in April of this year, Dr. Donald E. Scott proposes …Continue reading
sschirott February 22, 2018 multimedia Forecast Gets Darker for Dark Matter | Space News
In this episode, physicist Eugene Bagashov analyzes additional recent studies that raise even further doubt of the dark matter hypothesis, and he explores the growing scientific case for dark matter alternatives. In a recent Space News episode, we reported on two 2016 scientific studies that each serve potentially fatal blows …Continue reading
Gravity: Dark matter + Antimatter
=
1 - dark matter is 27% in universe
2 - normal matter is 5% in universe,
it means anti-matter must be also 5%.
So, dark-matter cannot be anti-matter
#
1 - dark matter has stuff and therefore
must feel gravity (takes part in gravity process)
But it doesn't reflect light or give off light
It means dark matter doesn't have electromagnetic
force (doesn't have electric charge)
2- we don't know what kind of particles it is made of
3 - anti-matter is made of anti-particles
Anti-particles have their own pure electric charge.
So, dark-matter cannot be anti-matter
#
1 - if dark matter doesn't have electric charge (neither normal,
nor anti-normal) then it is passive stuff
2 - the gravity-matter is the weakest force
(it is about 10^36 times weaker than the EM force)
3 - antimatter force is also 10^36 stronger than dark-matter
It means, anti-force has enough power to manipulate
with passive dark-matter to create black - gravity effect
#
To create ''normal-gravity'' is needed energy and matter
Antimatter is source of energy and dark-matter is source of mass
Their interaction can (with logW of probability) create black- gravity effect
With time black-gravity evolves into normal-gravity effect
===
=
1 - dark matter is 27% in universe
2 - normal matter is 5% in universe,
it means anti-matter must be also 5%.
So, dark-matter cannot be anti-matter
#
1 - dark matter has stuff and therefore
must feel gravity (takes part in gravity process)
But it doesn't reflect light or give off light
It means dark matter doesn't have electromagnetic
force (doesn't have electric charge)
2- we don't know what kind of particles it is made of
3 - anti-matter is made of anti-particles
Anti-particles have their own pure electric charge.
So, dark-matter cannot be anti-matter
#
1 - if dark matter doesn't have electric charge (neither normal,
nor anti-normal) then it is passive stuff
2 - the gravity-matter is the weakest force
(it is about 10^36 times weaker than the EM force)
3 - antimatter force is also 10^36 stronger than dark-matter
It means, anti-force has enough power to manipulate
with passive dark-matter to create black - gravity effect
#
To create ''normal-gravity'' is needed energy and matter
Antimatter is source of energy and dark-matter is source of mass
Their interaction can (with logW of probability) create black- gravity effect
With time black-gravity evolves into normal-gravity effect
===
Attachments
-
Gravity.jpg
The universe is infinite therefore you have absolutely no way to calculate amounts of matter dark, anti, or real. Your science fiction speculations are very interesting nonetheless. You must be a mainstream university professor of cosmology to have acquired such a daft
idea of the real nature of the material objects in space. Plasma rules and gravity does not exist as a discrete force at all.
Well, the universe that we inhabit is finite, starting with a "big-bang" and ending with a big chill. If that is going on inside yet another universe and that within another, maybe it approaches the infinite but what we know about it now is that the Universe had a discrete beginning, is time limited and entropy will run it down to naught.The universe is infinite therefore you have absolutely no way to calculate amounts of matter dark, anti, or real. Your science fiction speculations are very interesting nonetheless. You must be a mainstream university professor of cosmology to have acquired such a daft
idea of the real nature of the material objects in space. Plasma rules and gravity does not exist as a discrete force at all.
It is not apparently infinite.
Cosmology: two ideas
The ''big bang'' idea explains how hot singularity
created billions hot stars when the rest of the universe
is extremely cold
Big bang says nothing about where did ordinary matter
come from (it says: chickens come from eggs and eggs
come from chickens: singularity <---------> big bang )
This idea contradict ''dark matter - antimatter'' idea
#
To save gravity as universal law for galaxies the dark matter
was invented
Dark matter is extremely cold stuff
Dark matter is passive / neutral stuff (doesn't have electric charge)
This cold stuff is much more in universe than normal matter
Dark matter is seed of normal matter and of formation of stars.
#
To create gravity (stars) needs not only matter but also energy.
Quantum antiparticles ( antimatter) are cold stuff that carry itself
enormous pure energy (according to Dirac: -E=Mc^2)
Each antiparticle 10^36 times stronger than dark matter particle
(graviton) and therefore each antiparticle can manipulate with
huge stuff of dark matter
Antiparticles (through so called ''quantum fluctuations'' ) involve
dark matter in process which was ended by creation of all visual
stars, galaxies . . . etc
/ my opinion /
======
The ''big bang'' idea explains how hot singularity
created billions hot stars when the rest of the universe
is extremely cold
Big bang says nothing about where did ordinary matter
come from (it says: chickens come from eggs and eggs
come from chickens: singularity <---------> big bang )
This idea contradict ''dark matter - antimatter'' idea
#
To save gravity as universal law for galaxies the dark matter
was invented
Dark matter is extremely cold stuff
Dark matter is passive / neutral stuff (doesn't have electric charge)
This cold stuff is much more in universe than normal matter
Dark matter is seed of normal matter and of formation of stars.
#
To create gravity (stars) needs not only matter but also energy.
Quantum antiparticles ( antimatter) are cold stuff that carry itself
enormous pure energy (according to Dirac: -E=Mc^2)
Each antiparticle 10^36 times stronger than dark matter particle
(graviton) and therefore each antiparticle can manipulate with
huge stuff of dark matter
Antiparticles (through so called ''quantum fluctuations'' ) involve
dark matter in process which was ended by creation of all visual
stars, galaxies . . . etc
/ my opinion /
======
Attachments
-
Big Questions.jpg
The universe is a one off (UNI) and eternal and infinite.
Sep 11, 2018 The Universe is not only in motion. Galactic evolution occurs because large-scale plasma discharges form coherent filaments that exhibit electrodynamic behavior. Since the Universe is an electrical system that is constantly charging and discharging, instead of a gravitational system that is constantly contracting and expanding, gravity is…Continue reading
Frigid Fires
Apr 18, 2019 Even the coldest dust radiates light. The European Space Agency launched the Herschel Space Observatory on May 14, 2009 with the largest spaceborne mirror ever constructed. Herschel was sent into orbit around LaGrange point L2 in order to protect its helium-cooled infrared detectors. Its coolant system lasted…
Last edited: