iARTthere4iam said:Far from being some sort of national disgrace, the Foreign Minister has shown himself capable and every time he speaks this canadian stands up a little more straight.
Beats the hell out of "A proof is a proof. What kind of a proof? It's a proof. A proof is a proof. And when you have a good proof, it's because it's proven"
iARTthere4iam said:Beats the hell out of "A proof is a proof. What kind of a proof? It's a proof. A proof is a proof. And when you have a good proof, it's because it's proven"
Count me in too. JonB2004 may have crossed the line a bit with the personal insults but he's dead on with the Karlin "bombs".Hank C said:I have to side with JonB'04 and his assessment of Karlins post.![]()
Caleb-Dain Matton said:Mckay is a frickin' retard.
First, his betrayal to Orchard.
Second, his lame "terrorism" rhetoric (plagerizing Bush).
Third, his stripping Palestinian farmers, teachers and children of Canadian aid.
Fourth, his whiny Israeli stance.
Therefore, Mckay is a frickin' retard, and I would love for that guy to come visit Sarnia, Ontario so I can tell him to his face, since he doesn't like to respond to my kind emails.
Colpy said:Caleb-Dain Matton said:Mckay is a frickin' retard.
First, his betrayal to Orchard.
Second, his lame "terrorism" rhetoric (plagerizing Bush).
Third, his stripping Palestinian farmers, teachers and children of Canadian aid.
Fourth, his whiny Israeli stance.
Therefore, Mckay is a frickin' retard, and I would love for that guy to come visit Sarnia, Ontario so I can tell him to his face, since he doesn't like to respond to my kind emails.
One at a time.
1. I agree there was some idiocy in this event. McKay panicked when he had everything sewn up, and made a deal with Orchard that was the absolute epitome of stupidity.......unless you wanted Canada to become a corrupt Liberal one-party state a'la Mexico from 1920 to about 2000.
2. Terrorism exists, or have you been asleep for the last 5 years.....no 45 years?
3. What a shame. Canada will no longer be paying for the head terrorists' villas, or filling their numbered bank accounts, or paying the families of suicide bombers, or paying for textbooks in which the maps don't show Israel, or buying posters for the school that idolize murderers............I'm heartbroken.
4. Whiny? We were whiny when we spent so much time walking the neutrality line that we lost the ability not only to recognize the threat of those that hate our way of life, but the ability to discern evil.
Personally, I think in a battle of wits with Mr. McKay, you are unarmed.
Colpy said:Funny, I never heard anyone complaining when the Liberals held a MAJORITY with considerably less than 40% of the vote.
Hang around Buddy. You'll find out exactly how un-naive I am.
iARTthere4iam said:The canadian government cannot fund hamas because it is a terrorist organization and it is illegal under canadian law to fund a terrorist organization. It's not McKay's fault the palestinians elected a terrorist group.
Canada blacklisted Hamas as a terrorist group in 2002, so funding it would violate Ottawa’s own Anti-Terrorism Act.
Since 2000, CIDA’s annual allocation to the West Bank and Gaza, Palestinian refugees in the region and other “regional initiatives” has included $10 million a year toward the general budget of UNRWA – the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees – to provide basic health, education and social services.
In October 2004, Canada said it would continue to fund UNRWA even after its head admitted that some of its employees were Hamas members.
Last May, Martin promised $12.2 million to Mahmoud Abbas during the PA president’s visit to Ottawa. In September, Martin offered his congratulations on the Israeli pullout from Gaza and pledged an additional $24.5 million to the PA.
Both those pledges are now being reassessed.
Caleb-Dain Matton said:iARTthere4iam said:The canadian government cannot fund hamas because it is a terrorist organization and it is illegal under canadian law to fund a terrorist organization. It's not McKay's fault the palestinians elected a terrorist group.
They are democratically elected. They have a right to self-determination. Therefore, they are not a terrorist state. U.S. has used various terrorist methods of extracting Castro from power. Would you consider America terrorists? If not, don't be a hypocrite. I hate hypocrites.
Colpy said:[Adolph Hitler was democratically elected......with 44% of the vote.
That made him the bona fide representative of the German people.
Caleb-Dain Matton said:Colpy said:[Adolph Hitler was democratically elected......with 44% of the vote.
That made him the bona fide representative of the German people.
Actually, Hitler was appointed, so no he wasn't the bona fide representative of the German people. Just ask members of his council who tried to assassinate him.
Colpy said:Caleb-Dain Matton said:Colpy said:[Adolph Hitler was democratically elected......with 44% of the vote.
That made him the bona fide representative of the German people.
Actually, Hitler was appointed, so no he wasn't the bona fide representative of the German people. Just ask members of his council who tried to assassinate him.
He was apopointed Chancellor by the President as he controled the largest party in the Reichstag.........that means he was Germany's man.
And yes, there were assasination attempts, but a close look reveals that there was practically no resistence to Nazi rule in Germany.
Little resistence means tacit approval.
Nations are ALWAYS responsible for the actions of those that lead.
Just foir clarification's sake- does this mean that the "terror attacks" of 9/11 were somewhat justified??? That would seem to be the case, and the US getting bombed into the stone age would also be justified, with regards to their current geo-criminal actions, no??Collective punishment is perfectly fair when there is collective guilt.
And there's the hard edge of it.