RE: Palestinian hero kidn
I'm inclined to respond now:
That is prettty totalitarian behavior, listen to us, or you die.Be with the axis of ignorants, and you will have the chance to live your life,and have a job. if agression, oppression, violating human rights to all palestinians, stealing illegal territory would stop then agression (which is pretty funny, when you look at the statistic, it is easy to say who is the agressor) would end. simple as that. This is exactly the same, as a father who beat his child for 18 years, and then for the father to stop beating the child, the youngboy has to stop being agressive.
It's not a totalitarian stance aeon, it's reality. YOu cannot expect Israel to just sit there and take all the bullshit. If the suicide bombings stopped, the War would stop. You talk about violating human rights in regards to Israel, but are you even remotely aware of what Palestine does aeon? I mentioned in my previous post, the 4 students being murdered at school by Palestinian gunmen, is that humane? You call Israel the agressor, but my query to you is this; why, when Israel stops agression (i.e. before this Gaza incursion) does Palestine continue to attack them then? Can you explain that? I doubt you can.
As for a father beating his child. You always put this as a one-sided conflict aeon. "Palestine does nothing". Lets use your pretty lame analogy but gear it towards
REALITY:
A son constantly slaps his mother around, abuses his sister, kicks the family dog, so in return the Father slaps the son around. The father beats his son, then lets him go to see what he does. A week goes by, everything is good, then he pushes his sister down the stairs. In steps the father who slaps his son around. Lets another week go by and the son lights the dog on fire. Father steps in and slaps him around. That's reality aeon. Israel, yes, slaps Palestine around (a lot), but only does so, the vast majority of the time, after Palestine does something to deserve it i.e. abduct Israeli soldiers.
You are master to turn a subject to a nutpoint, what the hell this has to do with i said?
What the hell is a "nutpoint"? Regardless, it had to do with everything, you said:
You just don't understand what is going on, we the west are turning a blind eye on israel for the last 35 years
I then pointed out that during that 35 year period, Arab nations tried to
INVADE Israel. You tried to tell me the West is ignoring Palestine. No, it's not, it just doesn't have a lot of time for a group of people who call for the destruction of another Nation; i.e. in constant attacks and invasion of Israel.
What you are saying, the whole palestine, is a war zone, and israel,don't touch any of it, cause we will have the right to kill any of you.
No, not at all. Re-read what I wrote. What I
AM saying is that while Israel yes (I have been admitting this all along) has killed innocent people, they do so only by accident (and yes i'm sure some Israeli's have blatantly killed civilians), with a small proportion actually being killed by intent. Palestine on the other hand sets out to
maliciously cause harm to non-combatants. Hence why I support Israel and don't give a shit about Palestine. If Palestinians want to support individuals who willingly kill women and children, then I don't care if 10, 20, or 30 Palestinian civilians are killed by Israel defending itself.
Well the 4 israeli children killed was 4 years ago, that was an isolated incidents wasnt??
Uh, no it wasn't aeon. Here are some more:
- January 15 2005: An Israeli child living on a settlement was injured from a Qassam rocket, losing his hand. In the afternoon, a Qassam rocket hit Sderot and wounded 6 people. An Israeli 17-years-old woman suffered critical wounds. Hamas claimed responsibility.
- January 31 2005: 2 people suffered shock injuries as 7 mortar shells hit Neve Dekalim settlement in the Gaza Strip. Hamas claimed responsibility saying the shooting was in revenge for the killing of a 10-years-old girl in Rafah earlier this morning. Palestinians initially claimed she was killed by an IDF tank shell but it was letter revealed that she was killed by Palestinian pilgrims, who shot spontaneously into the air.
- February 28 2005: Two Israelis are wounded by a Palestinian shooting attack East of the city of Modi'in.
- April 18 2005: Two Israelis, one engineering NCO and one civilian, were wounded by a Palestinian sniper attack on Philadelphi Route of southern Gaza. The Popular Resistance Committees claimed responsibility.
- May 16 2005: Four Israeli construction workers were injured by a Palestinian anti-tank rocket attack on Philadelphi Route.
- June 24 2005: An Israeli teenager, Avichay Levi (17), is killed and four others are injured after a shooting attack from a Palestinian car in Beit Haggai junction south of Hebron. The Fatah's al-Aqsa Martyrs' Brigades claimed responsibility.
- June 26 2005: Avi Mantzur (16), who was critically injured in the June 24 Beit Haggai attack, dies from his wounds.
- July 14 2005: One Israeli woman was killed after the Palestinian militant groups Hamas and Fatah's al-Aqsa Martyrs' Brigades fired a barrage of more than a dozen Qassam rockets over Israeli settlements inside and outside the Gaza Strip.
- August 24 2005:A Palestinian stabs two Orthodox Jews in Jerusalem, killing one and injuring the other.
- October 16 2005: 2 drive-by shootings in the West Bank after a reasonably peaceful time in the region, the first in gush atzion junction near Hebron killing 3 Israeli civilians and wounding 3, the second in Alie junction in Binyamin settlement causing one teenager to be seriously wounded.
- October 26 2005: 5 Israli killed and 30 wounded in a suicide bombing in Hadera's open air market.
- December 5 2005: A suicide bomber killed himself and at least five israelis in a shopping mall in Netanya. Both Islamic Jihad and Al Aqsa Martyrs' Brigades claimed responsibility.
That is just 2005, and only the ones I ran through and grabbed quickly aeon. There are litterally dozens upon dozens of attacks. They're all there in that link I gave to you a few posts back. Only a few months in 2005 resulted in no civilian deaths, every month resulted in IDF deaths. Do you deem those attacks "isolated" incidents aeon? Or better yet, conducive to lasting peace?
What did you rebuild in afganisthan?? nothing at all, i again say we are not better than them, actually we are worst than them.
What did I rebuild in Afghanistan? I was on eleven (11) well digging parties in seven (7) months. I delivered school supplies to five (5) remote villages. My patrol group (and two others) helped build everything from storage sheds to assisting combat engineers on a school building project (which was nearing completion when I headed home). Our combat engineers have begun demining Afghanistan enmasse, we've built water purification plants, pumping stations, power stations, post offices, schools, houses, and police stations. We funded the construction of the ANA Base in Kabul, and provided them military material. No aeon, we've done a hell of a lot more than "nothing at all". We've done more for Afghans than you'll ever know.
And what evidence do you have they are doing god's work?? who told you that?
THEM you moron, in every claim they make. In every responsibility webcast, video tape, audio tape, everywhere. Every time they take responsibility for a suicide attack, or terrorist plot, they say they're doing gods work. Are you that stupid? What does Jihad mean aeon? A Muslim holy war or spiritual struggle against infidels. That right there is the bases for everything, religious zeal. Islamic terrorists conduct Jihads, therefore they conduct holy wars, therefore they are empowered by
RELIGIOUS OVERTONES My god you're a moron. Also one last tidbit:
Osama Bin Laden
"Your Muslim nation is looking for you and praying for your victory. You are their hope after God. You are God's trusted soldiers who will liberate the ummah (the Muslim nation) from the serfdom of the crusaders in our countries."
Might want to get in tune with the planet aeon. Islamic terrorism is
DRIVEN by religious zeal:
Link
I've never said FBI knew everything, none of those agency made up the data that eventually triggered those invasions, the administrations did.
So you're saying that the Bush Administration just up and invaded two (2) Nations based on a whim, yet used their intelligence agencies as the basis for said attacks? If that's the case aeon, then why didn't every agency stand up and denounce the attacks? Or better yet, why did members of the U.S. intelligence committee put their names on information justifying the attack if they knew they hadn't found any such information? Who in their right mind would (enmasse I might add) just sign off on intel that wasn't either researched and/or blatantly false? I can see maybe one or two people in an organization, but not every member of every U.S. intelligence agency. I'm not sure if you're aware as to how intelligence gathering works, but it has to start somewhere, and it goes up the chain to the top, then transfers across to the U.S. Government Administration for action. So it's a flow chart like this:
Field Operative->Local Headquarters->Regional Headquarters->Agency Headquarters->Administration
That means that at each step, someone (more often a group of people) would have to sign off on the intel as authentic. That's a huge paper trail aeon, one that would have been uncovered by now. Your retort?
That is your own opinion, and Ousama ben laden is in french, so you can go "'enough said""
Osama Bin Laden.