Your sentence is incomplete and incoherant.![]()
I didn't have a problem with it, insert "as" and remove "then" and Voila! (Some people do tend to confuse "then" and "than")
Your sentence is incomplete and incoherant.![]()
How DARE you insult the representative of Her Most Imperial Majesty, Ordained By God To Rule Over You?
I don't think anyone rally cares about the GG. A toothless dog. The problem that I have is with the office. The millions wasted on fluff, when it could go to healthcare, education or spent building cottages for Liberals.
I don't think anyone rally cares about the GG. A toothless dog. The problem that I have is with the office. The millions wasted on fluff, when it could go to healthcare, education or spent building cottages for Liberals.
I don't think anyone rally cares about the GG. A toothless dog. The problem that I have is with the office. The millions wasted on fluff, when it could go to healthcare, education or spent building cottages for Liberals.
... she insult millions of Canadians who are religious - for no apparent reason,
Better to have a toothless dog GG as our functional head of state then to have a maniac like the current US President.
How DARE you insult the representative of Her Most Imperial Majesty, Ordained By God To Rule Over You?
The GG is supposed to be neutral and apolitical...not the lapdog for the Prime Minister.
They also believe in a gawd so obviously they have problems with reality.
Two entirely different unrelated roles!![]()
And maybe both suited to the roles!
I am certain that the honourable member has the best interests of Israel firmly in mind.
BTW the church of England believes in man made climate change.
SO does the Pope.
What honourable member are you referring to?
Yes and no. They are both "heads of state" (technically, the Queen is ours but functionally, the GG is in practice). The Americans elect a royal family every four or eight years that still has temporal power. The roles do overlap.
Fu ck off
and replace it with what?
Nothing. We don't need a queen or a queens representitive.
The GG has the constitutional power to change the government, under certain circumstances. That almost happened about a decade or so back when the Liberals and NDP put a coalition together that had more seats than the Conservatives. Harper prorogued Parliament and headed it off but the GG could have legally asked the LIB/NDP to form a government.Except the G.G. has no decision making role in the running of the country and is strictly apolitical!
The GG has the constitutional power to change the government, under certain circumstances. That almost happened about a decade or so back when the Liberals and NDP put a coalition together that had more seats than the Conservatives. Harper prorogued Parliament and headed it off but the GG could have legally asked the LIB/NDP to form a government.
The GG has power that is rarely wielded. It is not a purely ceremonial position.
Read and maybe learn something, today:
The delicate role of the Governor General - Canada - CBC News
Probably more in theory than in practice!