Origin of Universe: God <vs> Big Bang/Non-God theories

lieexpsr

Electoral Member
Feb 9, 2007
301
2
18
Wow, I have -13 in rep points! And you guys should see them, they are mostly from Christians who don't agree with my opinions. Now that tells me something.

I've also got a couple of blue ones and one green one. Gee, I have handed out about a dozen green ones, of which more than half are to my opponents, and only handed out two red ones, one to the person who so wickedly insulted me as seen in my signature and one to a troller who just 'would not' leave me alone. One troller I actually gave a green one to. I don't take negative opinions pesonally though. ;-)
 

thorswolf

New Member
Feb 21, 2007
6
1
3
You got that right thor. Stick around we can use a breathe of fresh air here.
Thanks. I'm new here, but as far as fresh air goes, I got a fan made by Boeing over here...

Pet theory of mine:
In the beginning, there was a mass of energy and nothing else. Call it God, call it proto-matter, call it whatever. This energy was all there was, and it just sat there. Over eons, it became organized and gained consciousness of itself. This was fun for a while: I think, therefore I am. Then it got boring. I mean, there you are, most powerful thing around (only thing around as a matter of fact) and it's way before the invention of the couch, the TV, and the potato chip. So what's a deity/energy thingy to do? Well, there's nothing outside of me so might as well do somethign with all this energy. So WHAM! there's a Universe (connection with Genesis, Big Bang, et al.) Boy that looks great, sure is pretty too.

But after a while, it's like looking at a test pattern, fun at first, rapidly boring. So what's a deity/energy being to do? Well, play a game of course. But it has to be a good game, an interesting one, sorta like Tetris or The Sims. So take a little bit of energy and make these live game pieces and use the Universe as a game board and see what the pieces do. But the game didn't work. The pieces already KNEW they were part of a whole and the game got boring quickly. Then, huge brain wave: what if we make the pieces UNAWARE that it's a game and that the pieces are all really part of one and the same being (connection to religious beliefs and "life is everywhere" theories"). That would be more fun since the pieces would act as if it wasn't a game at all. They would have free will as if they were the most important thing in the world. Think of what could be learned and seen... think of the FUN!

And so we've been playing the game ever since...

Another sample of my 2% of a dollar.
 
  • Like
Reactions: hermanntrude

karrie

OogedyBoogedy
Jan 6, 2007
27,780
285
83
bliss
Your words speak my heart. I understand that feeling completely. I do not believe in God in the traditional sense, just that there's some kind of binding energy that holds us all together.. I don't know what it is, it could be no more than our thoughts and feelings having an affect on each other, but it's still there.

Well, I'm glad I'm not the only one. :angel8:
 

karrie

OogedyBoogedy
Jan 6, 2007
27,780
285
83
bliss
As a christian believer you may want to reject the idea because you are probably convinced that you are right with your faith. I don't know about that because to me you seem to be wavering all over the place, but that's only my perception and may not be entirely true. But I believe that you have now adopted the concept and you are now left with the choice of whether or not to leave such teaching until the age of 12, at which time you will not have the same power over your child and he can make his own choices. It's not teaching him that religion is wrong, it's only allowing him to make his own decision bases on his worldy experiences.

You understand the concept so I'm through explaining this to you for now unless you are interested in expanding on the idea.

It seems like quite a cop out to say that because I've seen plenty of people walk away from religion, they must not have been thoroughly influenced by it. Either my children will or will not be sufficiently influenced, but if taking them to church and sending them to Catholic school wasn't enough to sway my siblings, why would it be enough to sway my children? You implied it boiled down to intelligence levels, but that again doesn't hold true in my family.... so when does and doesn't this theory work?

I think you're right though, about not wanting to keep them away from religion until 12. If you were right, then all that is doing is indoctrinating them into your belief system. I see nothing wrong with teaching them about religion. Teaching them or not teaching them is the same thing: either way, you're deciding what kind of person your child should be when they grow up, and attempting to mold that. I fail to see what's wrong with the people I or any of my family have turned out to be.
 

karrie

OogedyBoogedy
Jan 6, 2007
27,780
285
83
bliss
The Gian stuff about the power of the planet itself as a complex organism as that binding energy you're talking about offers me a lot of comfort.:wave:

I think it's all one and the same. It strikes me as simply different names for the same darn thing. Power.
 

karrie

OogedyBoogedy
Jan 6, 2007
27,780
285
83
bliss
Interesting thread. I noticed one teensy-weensy missing dimension and that's time and our own point of view. We are still egotistical in thinking that our own (very fallible) human point of view is the only one that exists and that patterns of the Universe HAVE to fit within our own very limited worldview. We see time in a very linear fashion and we see events as unfolding through that perception of time: this happened, THEN that happened, etc. It's our own perception and our own observation, but who says that it's the truth?

My own 2% of a dollar...

I totally agree. Human thinking fails us when it comes to some areas. be it inadequate language to describe something, or an inability to wrap our tiny brains around something.
 

karrie

OogedyBoogedy
Jan 6, 2007
27,780
285
83
bliss
You are entitled to your opinion but I'm keeping my signature up until you convince them that it needs to be taken down. It's illustrative of Christianity to a large extent IMO and that's why it's there. It's not inflammatory. Grab something I have said if you must and even attach my name to it if it serves your purpose. Also keep in mind that I didn't attach the offending christian's name but I could have done. Or just take it as the punishment that is deserved by the offending individual.

i never said you should take it down. But, so long as it's up, don't lecture others on pointing out bad behavior and ettiquette. also, thinking I know who wrote that, I wouldn't think that you're punishing her too much by parading her words out in the open. she says some highly derogatory things as a matter of habit, and doesn't seem to care one bit about what people think about the things she says. she's probably thrilled that something she'd have gotten in trouble from the mods for if she'd posted in the forum, is now being displayed for everyone to read.
 

karrie

OogedyBoogedy
Jan 6, 2007
27,780
285
83
bliss
I'll just add that if you don't understand that in this case DO and WHY are the same, and if you don't get that then you are not comprehending.


So, this is the one and only unique area of the brain where the way it functions, and the reason it functions, are the same thing? I highly doubt that. Hearing, sight, sound, taste, touch, memory, sleep, learning.... everything else the brain does, the HOW and the WHY are not the same thing. We don't even have sleep, such a basic thing, figured out completely, but this has been figured out 100%?
 

darkbeaver

the universe is electric
Jan 26, 2006
41,035
201
63
RR1 Distopia 666 Discordia
Interesting thread. I noticed one teensy-weensy missing dimension and that's time and our own point of view. We are still egotistical in thinking that our own (very fallible) human point of view is the only one that exists and that patterns of the Universe HAVE to fit within our own very limited worldview. We see time in a very linear fashion and we see events as unfolding through that perception of time: this happened, THEN that happened, etc. It's our own perception and our own observation, but who says that it's the truth?

My own 2% of a dollar...
Good point thorswolf, we don't even know for sure that we are the most intelligent animal on the planet or what actually constitutes intelligence, we do know that we don't percieve much of what's really in front of our eyes.:wave:
 

lieexpsr

Electoral Member
Feb 9, 2007
301
2
18
Is there a version I believe in? The answer would be no. All are, as you say, written by humans. Humans are flawed. Humans have agendas. Humans have limits in understanding due to the times and societies in which they exist. Do I think that it was inspired? Yes. Do I think it contains many great lessons, yes. I judge it as I do anything else in life.... does it have more good to teach than anything else? yes. so I keep it. If it contained more bad than good, I wouldn't be a Christian anymore. Simple as that.

So! You don't think that the bible is the word of god and it's infallible. That's good to know because many christians are not of your opinion. I'm just trying to sort out what brand of christian people are so I can talk about their beliefs. Sometimes it's like pulling teeth and I believe that may be because christians really don't want to betray what their beliefs really are because of the farout nature of them. Not catholics so much but definitely the literal young earthers of the U.S. But catholics too because of issues such as condom use which we have already started to cover.

This thread is a good place to air our views becasue it specifically asks for non-god ideas. Nobody can be accused of butting in on their party here!
 

lieexpsr

Electoral Member
Feb 9, 2007
301
2
18
personally i'd say u should get positive for ending the dispute.

What dispute? I know of no ongoing dispute with anyone. I know there are a couple who are carrying around a sour grapes attitude toward me but I'm sure they will grow out of it in time.
 

lieexpsr

Electoral Member
Feb 9, 2007
301
2
18
Well, I'm glad I'm not the only one. :angel8:

You are far from the only one to feel this binding sense or however you want to put it. Mostly all christians feel it too and even those who are in the process of giving up religion. The trouble is, once a child is immersed in it the child is going to suffer a lot if it tries to get out of it. It's the nature of the beast! That's why I am trying through talking to you about it to get others to read and start learning what the feeling really is. All it takes is courage to take the first step and then trust me, it becomes addictive.

But frankly karrie, I don't think you are going to change. But I urge you to give your child a chance to make up his own mind when he becomes old enough to do so. That means, don't fill his head with ideas which he will be totally incapable of discarding later on in life. That's all I am going to say to you on the subject of childhood impressions and imprinting of same.
 

AmberEyes

Sunshine
Dec 19, 2006
495
36
28
Vancouver Island
You are far from the only one to feel this binding sense or however you want to put it. Mostly all christians feel it too and even those who are in the process of giving up religion. The trouble is, once a child is immersed in it the child is going to suffer a lot if it tries to get out of it. It's the nature of the beast! That's why I am trying through talking to you about it to get others to read and start learning what the feeling really is. All it takes is courage to take the first step and then trust me, it becomes addictive.
.

You make it sound as if anybody who feels this binding force is somehow blinded by religion. I was not raised in a christian household, nor have I ever been attracted to christianity. Science can only explain so much.
 

lieexpsr

Electoral Member
Feb 9, 2007
301
2
18
It seems like quite a cop out to say that because I've seen plenty of people walk away from religion, they must not have been thoroughly influenced by it. Either my children will or will not be sufficiently influenced, but if taking them to church and sending them to Catholic school wasn't enough to sway my siblings, why would it be enough to sway my children? You implied it boiled down to intelligence levels, but that again doesn't hold true in my family.... so when does and doesn't this theory work?

I think you're right though, about not wanting to keep them away from religion until 12. If you were right, then all that is doing is indoctrinating them into your belief system. I see nothing wrong with teaching them about religion. Teaching them or not teaching them is the same thing: either way, you're deciding what kind of person your child should be when they grow up, and attempting to mold that. I fail to see what's wrong with the people I or any of my family have turned out to be.

Well that comes off to me as your fear that if you give a child a chance to make up his own mind, he may reject religion. It's obviously a false idea to say that by keeping it away from him he will become an atheist. You can't back that up with any evidence at all but if you think you can then I will welcome it. Do you comprehend why I would welcome it? You know I speak the truth don't you. And if you don't like being told by me then get in touch with a psychiatrist or a child psychologist who is not working on behalf of the church. You may be informed by the experts that your child is an animal just like all the other animals in this respect. Just like a baby duckling which adopts the first moving thing it sees as it's mother. I think you get the picture.
 
Last edited:

lieexpsr

Electoral Member
Feb 9, 2007
301
2
18
You make it sound as if anybody who feels this binding force is somehow blinded by religion. I was not raised in a christian household, nor have I ever been attracted to christianity. Science can only explain so much.

Blinded by religion is aptly descriptive. A child psychologist wouldn't put it exactly that way. ;-) But I have said that there are other influences at play. Have you been reading all my comments on this matter? If so you will have read that child psychology is not my field so I directed karrie to seek the help of a professional if she wants to understand fully. She is charged with the huge responsibility of bringing up a child in the best way she knows how. You too will probably encounter that daunting task. I have and my children are not atheists, they are both unspoken agnostics I suppose because they really don't even think of it as far as I know. THey are good people and probably have higher opinions of others of different beliefs than most christians. They sure as hell don't condemn 4.5 billion people to the hellfires!

The issue goes back to my assertion that one who is born into christianity will in most likelihood remain a christian, as opposed to becoming a Muslim or a Buddhist. I know that you are not going to split hairs and point out the exceptions because we all recognize that they exist. And the reason why I pointed this out in the beginning is because of the horrible idea that most christians believe that they are the only ones who will be raptured up, blah, blah, blah. That is a very repugnant idea to me to think that 4.5 billion are going to roast. So I only say that if you feel this binding force you describe and karrie describes, investigate the answers which science offers you as an explanation. The simple fact is, that the large majority of cases are completely explainable. And maybe not all. It's up to you and frankly, now is a great time for you to do it. That's all!

I should have also added, nobody is safe from it and nobody is invulnerable against religion's influence.
 
Last edited:

karrie

OogedyBoogedy
Jan 6, 2007
27,780
285
83
bliss
You make it sound as if anybody who feels this binding force is somehow blinded by religion. I was not raised in a christian household, nor have I ever been attracted to christianity. Science can only explain so much.

I really truly feel that not all people involved in religion feel the same way you and I do. Some are there for societal reasons. Some are there out of instilled guilt. I think that for anyone who feels like you and seeks answers, religion may be where they find them, or science may be where they find them. But I don't think being raised in religion makes a person feel the way we do. Most religious people I know have no clue what I'm describing when I try to bring it up.
 

lieexpsr

Electoral Member
Feb 9, 2007
301
2
18
karrie says: " Most religious people I know have no clue what I'm describing when I try to bring it up."

Many educated atheists who are fairly well educated in the applicable science know exactly what you are describing! ;-)