Ontario sex education scale back is a human rights violation

mentalfloss

Prickly Curmudgeon Smiter
Jun 28, 2010
39,817
471
83
Families to launch human rights case over outdated sex-ed curriculum

At least six Ontario families are launching a human rights case over the province’s plan to use an outdated sex-ed curriculum, saying it will harm their children — the first legal challenge amid a growing backlash over reviving the two-decade-old lessons and the impact on LGBTQ youth.

While the main applicant is an 11-year-old trans youth from rural Ontario, a number of families from Guelph, Toronto, Sudbury and other cities will support the case with evidence of how the new curriculum — which the Ford government said it will suspend this fall — helped support their elementary school children.

All of the kids involved in the case are younger than 13.

“We’ve been in conversation with parents of trans and queer youth, currently in Grades K to 8 … and these families are very concerned about the planned changes,” said lawyer Marcus McCann, who along with colleague Mika Imai will be announcing the human rights challenge Thursday at Queen’s Park.

“Our belief is that shelving the curriculum is raising red flags from a human rights perspective.”

Imai said they will request an expedited hearing, and may seek an interim order to keep the updated curriculum in place this fall.

While the families were going to hold off until the government officially ordered boards to revert to the 1998 curriculum, with school just weeks away “we just can’t wait,” added McCann. “The stakes are too high.”

On Wednesday, another public school board issued a statement of concern about reviving the old curriculum, which was used from 1998 to 2014 and contains no mention of same-sex families, gender identity, cyberbullying or sexual consent.

Education Minister Lisa Thompson said her government is fulfilling a campaign promise by holding public consultations on the new curriculum, in use since 2015, after hearing from some parents who complained they were not consulted and that the material is not age-appropriate.

The government will begin consultations this fall, although no specifics have been released.

Thompson has said the ministry will work with boards to provide resources for the 20-year-old curriculum and that there’s “ample room” to discuss issues not covered in it.

Jake Somerville’s child began transitioning in kindergarten and “we found that the school, the teachers, played a really big role,” said the Guelph father, helping her socially and “working with children in the classroom who had a lot of questions about what she was going through.”

https://www.thestar.com/amp/news/qu...hts-case-over-outdated-sex-ed-curriculum.html
 

Walter

Hall of Fame Member
Jan 28, 2007
34,888
126
63
Why can’t parents teach their kids about the stuff the schools won’t have in the curriculum?
 

mentalfloss

Prickly Curmudgeon Smiter
Jun 28, 2010
39,817
471
83
They already can teach their kids whatever they want but they don't.

Why can't schools have the opportunity to properly educate our children?
 

DaSleeper

Trolling Hypocrites
May 27, 2007
33,676
1,666
113
Northern Ontario,


 

Danbones

Hall of Fame Member
Sep 23, 2015
24,505
2,198
113
Not sure what humans lefts are involved here.

They already can teach their kids whatever they want but they don't.

Why can't schools have the opportunity to properly educate our children?

...because teachers are still teaching Columbus discovered America and they don't teach the death toll of your favorite subject:
:(
communism.
 

White_Unifier

Senate Member
Feb 21, 2017
7,300
2
36
Next.... comes the "Your momma wears rubber boots" childish insult.....

Never mind my mom. I used to wear rubber boots on rainy days when I was young and if I spent more time outside on rainy days, I met get some in the future too.

What have you got against rubber?
 

Jinentonix

Hall of Fame Member
Sep 6, 2015
11,619
6,262
113
Olympus Mons
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: The ONLY possible way ANYONE with any kind of "clout" will rule this a "violation of human rights" is if it goes before the Ontario Human Rights Kangaroo Court.

If they ain't teaching that the stuff in the current curriculum is "wrong", then it's not a human rights violation. I'd say not teaching kids about what should be mandatory stuff like finances and economics is a human rights violation too since these are essential pieces of knowledge in the adult world. But ALT-leftards sure as hell don't want that to happen.