Ontario man builds real-life female android

Praxius

Mass'Debater
Dec 18, 2007
10,677
161
63
Halifax, NS & Melbourne, VIC
I'm not picking what's important. I'm telling you that your attempt to rationalize away why he gave her a vagina is bunk. lol. He gave her a vagina because he's having sex, or intends to have sex, with her. No benefit of the doubt here. He built himself a slavebot. Plain and simple. Sure... he'll make money too, and he's brilliant and what he did isn't 'bad'... but he built a slavebot nonetheless.

Are you telling me that if a woman decided to make a male android that she wouldn't add her favorite extension to her masterbate.... er... piece?

Of course it's a slavebot, he even mentioned that was her function.... to do all his cleaning, and eventually to help with simple medical tasks for the disabled, etc.... who knows? As he said, the sky is the limit.

If he wants to have an overglorified penis pump for his own pleasures, who are we to argue, lol....

However to simply claim that he plans to have sex with her or already has is still questionable. Maybe he did and he lied to everybody when asked. Then again, why would he have a need to lie.... he's already a bit wierd as it is and it'd be no suprise if he did...... but if I was making a female android, I'd make it female..... it's not much of a female if it ain't got it's parts. If it didn't then it'd just be a glorified barbie doll, and there's more then enough of them in the WWE at the moment.

It's also like how two peolpe dating can sometimes be assumed to be having sex because they live together, when they're actually waiting to get married for that. They can technically do it, nobody is really stopping them except themselves, therefore it's easy to assume they're having sex.

Or when someone has an interest in some kinky sex fetish. They may like watching whatever it is, seeing other people doing whatever it is they like, but that doesn't actually mean they'd ever do it in their lifetimes.

Maybe the guy is A-Sexual (Sure even I doubt that one) but there's all kinds of possibilities. You could bet dimes to doughnuts that he has, and there's probably a good chance that he did..... but there isn't any real proof unless you want to blue light the androids crotch like in CSI to look for stains.

Then who is the real obsessed person? ;-) :p
 

Praxius

Mass'Debater
Dec 18, 2007
10,677
161
63
Halifax, NS & Melbourne, VIC
whats wrong with building a pleasurebot?

There is a slight chance that if they become mass produced, that someday they might all instantly switch to kill mode and rip everybody's genitals off resulting in a massive sonic boom of millions of humans screaming at the top of their lungs at the same time around the globe which would cause enough atmospheric pressure to shock our atmosphere off of the planet, resulting in everybody dying and then the androids take over the world.
 

karrie

OogedyBoogedy
Jan 6, 2007
27,780
285
83
bliss
why would he lie Prax? Why would the guy who is taking his android out to public engagements lie about having sex with it? Hmmmm.... let me think about that one a little bit. Perhaps because people don't want their kids shaking hands with someone's sex doll? perhaps?

Sorry... but I don't buy it for one sec that he gave her all that without intentions to use it. lol. And yes, if I built a male android, I'd likely give it the appropriate accoutrment. The difference being that I probably wouldn't make it functional or put sensors in it UNLESS I intended to function test the damn thing.
 

Praxius

Mass'Debater
Dec 18, 2007
10,677
161
63
Halifax, NS & Melbourne, VIC
why would he lie Prax? Why would the guy who is taking his android out to public engagements lie about having sex with it? Hmmmm.... let me think about that one a little bit. Perhaps because people don't want their kids shaking hands with someone's sex doll? perhaps?

Sorry... but I don't buy it for one sec that he gave her all that without intentions to use it. lol. And yes, if I built a male android, I'd likely give it the appropriate accoutrment. The difference being that I probably wouldn't make it functional or put sensors in it UNLESS I intended to function test the damn thing.

Maybe he just figured there's a wide market out there for that and built it anyways for other's to test out?

I know, devil's advocate till the bitter end, I be.

But then back to your comment, why would you slap a penis on your male android but not make it function, probably speaking of course?

If you know how to do it and you have the resources, why not go all the way out and get it functioning to the best of your abilities?

A loose case in point, Did you ever see this character:


^ Most 3D animators/modelers when wanting to build a character accurately, will design from the ground up. In the above character's case, she (Along with all the other characters of the movie: Final Fantasy) was first designed top to bottom with no clothes and all the details that come with a typical human body. The clothes came secondary.

Now what point would there be in going through this much detail when in the entire movie there is no nudity or anything shown they what you see above?

#1 - Because you can.
#2 - Because you end up with a much more accurate and detailed 3D model this way then you would if you modeled the character from scratch with all their common clothing.
#3 - When you want to change something in the character's atire, it's much easier and you don't end up having to remodel 90% of the character.
#4 - Guys are generally pervs. *shrugs*

So how does this connect to the above andoid and the details he went through so far in regards to genitals and the sort?

#1 - Because he can
#2 - Because now it's one less thing he has to work on and probably was one of the more easier things to get out of the way.
#3 - If he's going to go through that much work to give the thing that much vocabulary, that much detail in the head and the rest of the body and trying to make it as close to human as possible, why would you stop suddenly in the genital areas? simply because it's taboo?
#4 - Because guys are pervs. *Shrugs*
 

karrie

OogedyBoogedy
Jan 6, 2007
27,780
285
83
bliss
why would you slap a penis on your male android but not make it function, probably speaking of course?


... was first designed top to bottom with no clothes and all the details that come with a typical human body. The clothes came secondary.

#2 - Because you end up with a much more accurate and detailed 3D model....
These points answer why I would do it. Male clothing doesn't look the same over a flat pubis. With a female however, making a vagina internal and functioning, makes no difference on how the clothing hangs. And making the male genitalia function doesn't effect the look of the clothes.

Also, keep in mind that I didn't say I WOULDN'T make it functioning. I said I wouldn't make it function UNLESS I intended to function test it. it's up to you to guess the probability of which route I'd choose. :p
 

shadowshiv

Dark Overlord
May 29, 2007
17,545
120
63
52
These points answer why I would do it. Male clothing doesn't look the same over a flat pubis. With a female however, making a vagina internal and functioning, makes no difference on how the clothing hangs. And making the male genitalia function doesn't effect the look of the clothes.

Also, keep in mind that I didn't say I WOULDN'T make it functioning. I said I wouldn't make it function UNLESS I intended to function test it. it's up to you to guess the probability of which route I'd choose. :p

I think I could hazard a guess as to which route you would take.
 

karrie

OogedyBoogedy
Jan 6, 2007
27,780
285
83
bliss
Okay, while I still find it suspect that he would add sensors, it finally (please don't laugh, I can't believe I didn't realize earlier) hit me that all he did is buy a sex doll, which would have come complete with lifelike vag whether he liked it or not. Duh karrie.
 

Praxius

Mass'Debater
Dec 18, 2007
10,677
161
63
Halifax, NS & Melbourne, VIC
These points answer why I would do it. Male clothing doesn't look the same over a flat pubis. With a female however, making a vagina internal and functioning, makes no difference on how the clothing hangs. And making the male genitalia function doesn't effect the look of the clothes.

Hey I see a point in putting in all the doins of a female character for cloth perspective purposes..... I've seen my share of camel toe wedgies :p

Also, keep in mind that I didn't say I WOULDN'T make it functioning. I said I wouldn't make it function UNLESS I intended to function test it. it's up to you to guess the probability of which route I'd choose. :p

I'm aware, but perhaps I didn't explain myself clearly in the previous post in regards to that:

You said:

"The difference being that I probably wouldn't make it functional or put sensors in it UNLESS I intended to function test the damn thing."

And I responded with:

"why would you slap a penis on your male android but not make it function, probably speaking of course?" ;-)
 

Praxius

Mass'Debater
Dec 18, 2007
10,677
161
63
Halifax, NS & Melbourne, VIC
Okay, while I still find it suspect that he would add sensors, it finally (please don't laugh, I can't believe I didn't realize earlier) hit me that all he did is buy a sex doll, which would have come complete with lifelike vag whether he liked it or not. Duh karrie.

That did sorta cross my mind a bit ago, not that he bought one (although that would have saved a hell of a lot of time) but towards something I was going to use in the debate towards people screwing around with non-human things that look human, but that does make sense.
 

shadowshiv

Dark Overlord
May 29, 2007
17,545
120
63
52
That did sorta cross my mind a bit ago, not that he bought one (although that would have saved a hell of a lot of time) but towards something I was going to use in the debate towards people screwing around with non-human things that look human, but that does make sense.

Heck, if a hole in a picnic table is to someone's tastes, why would a fembot not be as well?:lol: