Omnibus : 2022 Midterm Elections

Ron in Regina

"Voice of the West" Party
Apr 9, 2008
33,104
11,869
113
Regina, Saskatchewan
A federal judge postponed ruling on Wednesday whether President Donald Trump can arbitrarily ban journalists from covering the White House, delaying the question of restoring press access to three national news organizations

In a virtual hearing Wednesday afternoon, U.S. District Judge Timothy Kelly did not rule from the bench on restoring credentials for MS NOW, CNN and Politico, which were ejected from the White House grounds and pool on Saturday.
Lawyers representing the three news organizations alleged that Trump’s ban violates not only the First Amendment but also the due process clause of the Fifth Amendment. They also said the ban inhibits affected journalists from effectively doing their jobs.

“The ban irreparably curtails the organizations’ speech — preventing them from being able to publish stories they otherwise would — each day it remains in effect,” the complaint alleged. “The ban also impermissibly chills the speech of other news organizations and journalists, who must now balance conducting their constitutionally protected and vitally important work of reporting on the White House against the risk that coverage the President ‘dislike’ will condemn them to the same fate.”
 

Ron in Regina

"Voice of the West" Party
Apr 9, 2008
33,104
11,869
113
Regina, Saskatchewan
On Monday morning MS NOW, Politico and CNN announced they are all three suing Trump and several top administration officials, alleging that the ban “could not be a more direct assault on the First Amendment.”
CNN, MS NOW and Politico journalists were barred from the White House on Thursday, just hours after a federal judge deemed US President Donald Trump's ban of the three news outlets likely unconstitutional and ordered their access ‌immediately restored.

The news organizations responded by requesting an immediate hearing before US District Judge Tim Kelly, whose ruling overnight ordered a halt to the ban for 14 days in a major setback for Trump. It is the latest in a series of confrontations over press freedom that have played out over the past week in the courtroom and White House grounds.
Kelly found that the revocation of the White House credentials of the journalists "likely violated their constitutional due process rights." The judge, who Trump appointed in 2017 during his first presidential term, also raised doubts about the US Department of Justice's national security arguments for justifying the ban, noting that Trump himself had said the action was due to what the president alleged was false or negative coverage.
 

Ron in Regina

"Voice of the West" Party
Apr 9, 2008
33,104
11,869
113
Regina, Saskatchewan
Funny how no one is talking about the previous administration doing the same . Amazing how that always happens .
It is interesting that nobody is talking about the Biden administration banning specific entire news outlets from the White House while not banning others. Can you give a couple names for example, examples of these specific news agencies that the Biden administration banned from the White House? Or do you mean the previous to the Biden administration? Or do you mean previous to the previous Trump administration?
There have been previous instances of administrations attempting to limit certain outlets' access. The Obama administration tried to exclude Fox News from participating in a specific press pool interview with an administration official in 2009.
1790272503467.jpeg
But after objections from the other four networks in the pool, Fox News was allowed in.
 

Ron in Regina

"Voice of the West" Party
Apr 9, 2008
33,104
11,869
113
Regina, Saskatchewan
Republican National Committee (RNC) Chair Joe Gruters said Wednesday he expects his party to hold on to its majorities in both chambers of Congress during November’s midterms, predicting the GOP will claim 220 seats in the House and 53 in the Senate.

“But listen, I would say, ‘Bet on us.’ If you look at what we’ve done over the last two years, we have better candidates across the country in both the Senate and the House races, we have a lot more resources to spend,” Gruters told host Blake Burman on NewsNation’s “The Hill.”

“And then we have our secret weapon and president, Donald J. Trump, and I say that because we’re going to barnstorm the country,” he continued. “We’re going to do lots of rallies … and we’re going to deliver for the American people.”

Probability: 72% to 95% chance Democrats take the House.
Probability: 51% to 66% chance Democrats take the Senate.
Democratic Sweep (Both Chambers): 61% – 66% chance
Split Congress (D House, R Senate): 26% – 30% chance
Republican Sweep (Both Chambers): Less than 10% chance

Gruters’s position comes just after polling numbers suggested President Trump’s approval ratings have dipped to a career low — political baggage his party will have to grapple with come November.
US Senate Republicans aim to improve their election prospects by voting on legislation that seeks to protect consumers from rising electricity bills caused by data centers, hoping to win over voters struggling with inflation stoked by President Donald Trump's war with Iran.

Republicans had the ‌option to depart Washington on Thursday and stay out until after the November 3 midterm election. But they chose to return next week to take up the Ratepayer Protection Act at the behest of Senator Jon Husted, who is trailing the Democratic candidate, former Senator Sherrod Brown, in Ohio, a state Trump won by more than 11 points in 2024.

Republicans believe their votes in favor of the bill will demonstrate their commitment to helping voters focused on a cost-of-living crisis, with polls showing broad opposition to data centers despite Trump's support for their development.
Artificial intelligence, the super technology with humanlike capabilities, will be referred to by the United States as “super intelligence,” President Donald Trump said Tuesday. Trump made the announcement during his speech at the United Nations General Assembly after he and the White House polled the public on X and Truth Social about potential alternative names.

“From this point forward, ⁠all ⁠of United ⁠States documents, and hopefully the world’s, will be ⁠changed to use the much more accurate term ‘super’ as ⁠opposed to ‘artificial.’ So it’s super ⁠intelligence,” Trump said. It’s unclear why let alone when the change will take place or how it will be implemented.

In social media polls, Trump floated other alternative names such as “extreme intelligence” and “superior intelligence.”
Inflation on groceries and gas hits everyone. But skyrocketing diesel prices aim a missile squarely at the voters Trump can least afford to alienate. Only a highly specific demographic at the pump, after all, knows its way around the diesel nozzles. Fully 90 percent of diesel truck buyers are men. More than 84 percent identify as white. Most strikingly of all, truckers have a ram-tough party ID. According to one analysis, Republicans purchase eight heavy-duty trucks for every one purchased by a Democrat.
 

spaminator

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 26, 2009
40,883
4,105
113
Canadian woman, 75, accused of illegally voting in three U.S. elections
Authorities say the accused faces maximum penalty of three years in federal prison

Author of the article:Spiro Papuckoski
Published Sep 25, 2026 • Last updated 21 hours ago • 1 minute read
A vote sign is pictured outside a polling station as early voting begins in Miami, Oct. 21, 2024.
A vote sign is pictured outside a polling station as early voting begins in Miami, Oct. 21, 2024. Photo by Joe Raedle /Getty Images

A 75-year-old Canadian woman living in Florida has been accused by the U.S. Justice Department of illegally voting in three federal elections.


Authorities say Christiane Vinette Young, a Canadian citizen who is illegally living in the U.S., has been charged by information with three counts of voting by an alien.

It is alleged she cast ballots in the 2024 general election, 2022 general election, and 2022 primary in Fort Myers.

“An information is merely a formal charge that a defendant has committed one or more violations of federal criminal law, and every defendant is presumed innocent unless, and until, proven guilty,” the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Middle District of Florida said in a statement.


Not a U.S. citizen, authorities say
She is accused of voting three times despite knowing that she is not a U.S. citizen.

If convicted on all counts, the accused faces a maximum penalty of three years in federal prison.

U.S. Attorney Gregory W. Kehoe announced the charges Wednesday.




Unknown how accused registered to vote
Officials did not explain how the accused obtained the ballots or how authorities discovered that a non-citizen managed to register and vote in the elections and primary.

It is also unknown where in Canada the accused is originally from.

The Justice Department said the case was investigated by Homeland Security Investigations, with assistance from the Florida Department of Law Enforcement and the Lee County Supervisor of Elections.

No court dates have been announced in the case.
 

Ron in Regina

"Voice of the West" Party
Apr 9, 2008
33,104
11,869
113
Regina, Saskatchewan
A 75-year-old Canadian woman living in Florida has been accused by the U.S. Justice Department of illegally voting in three federal elections.
I wonder, if she did vote in three U.S. elections, who she voted for?
Officials did not explain how the accused obtained the ballots or how authorities discovered that a non-citizen managed to register and vote in the elections and primary. It is also unknown where in Canada the accused is originally from.
 

pgs

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 29, 2008
29,433
8,718
113
B.C.
I can’t be curious? Ultimately one vote 400,000,000 that’s ineligible is irrelevant, but I’m still curious.
I think elections should be secure and any caught skirting the rules or out and out cheating should be prosecuted regard of party or affiliation.. One out of four hundred million is a drop in a bucket , but waves start slow and gain momentum.
 

Ron in Regina

"Voice of the West" Party
Apr 9, 2008
33,104
11,869
113
Regina, Saskatchewan
Corporate donors to US President Donald Trump's ballroom 🤔 and participants in business deals brokered by Trump family members 😳 are expected to be among the first targets 😲 of investigations if Democrats take control of the House or Senate in November's midterm elections, multiple Capitol Hill staffers, lawmakers and attorneys told Reuters in recent days.

Control of either chamber would give Democrats subpoena power and funding to bolster investigative staff, enabling them to launch probes as early as February ‌and potentially triggering lengthy legal battles that would place the Trump family business empire squarely in the spotlight.

“I’m not affected by the election,” Trump told reporters in the Oval Office. “No. 1, I’m not running. But my party’s running, and I’m going to help my party.🙄”

The investigations could dominate the second half of Trump's term after two years of dealmaking in which the Trump family expanded into crypto, drones, artificial intelligence and prediction markets, while the president's personal wealth grew by an estimated $2.2 billion.🤫
 

55Mercury

rigid member
May 31, 2007
4,651
1,229
113
Since Trump targeted Iran's leaders supporters and their families (girl's school), then it's only fair game if Iran targets trump's and all his billionaire supporters' families too.
It might even bring about a quicker ending to all the idiot billionaire scientists supporting the war against Iran.
Trump already set the precedent. Families are not out of bounds.
 

Ron in Regina

"Voice of the West" Party
Apr 9, 2008
33,104
11,869
113
Regina, Saskatchewan
Peter Navarro, who has lashed out at Canada in the past, made these latest remarks during a talk at an economic conference in Washington on Tuesday threatening repercussions for Canada if it "interferes" in the upcoming midterm elections — though it's not clear what he anticipates the country would do to impact the vote.
1790714514392.jpeg
Unfortunately if all you and your administration know how to do is threaten then eventually the threats stopped meaning much after a while. Navarro was speaking generally about the Trump administration's trade policy when the conversation turned to the ongoing dispute with Canada. He blasted Canadians on "K Street" — an area in Washington known as a hub for lobbyists — telling them to "get the hell out of our country."

“The problem you have is you lobby this country and you've been successful in the past and you think you can keep doing that," Navarro said of Canada's approach. "Memo to Canada: You cannot do that. That game is up and if you interfere in our elections in Maine or Michigan you will pay even more dearly” as US Republicans are highly anxious and in serious danger of losing key Senate races in both Maine and Michigan.
Navarro said he "loves" the Canadian people but has had no love for Canadian negotiators since 2016. "You just can't trust them," he said.

Navarro didn't elaborate on what he meant by suggesting Canada could interfere in the election because that would imply justifiable coherence, but the ongoing trade war has become an election topic in the two border states he mentioned above as national headwinds are dragging down the Republican party—including low approval ratings for President Trump, concerns over the ongoing war in Iran, and an economy struggling with inflation—both states are classified by top forecasters as toss-ups. Because the GOP is defending a slim 53–47 Senate majority, dropped races in these states could hand control of the chamber back to the Democrats.
With this fear the National Republican Senatorial Committee have shifted funds out of traditionally safe red states specifically to shore up the defensive firewall in Maine and keep the race alive in Michigan. If both states go blue, the Republican Senate majority is virtually ‘guaranteed’ to collapse through no fault of Canada’s.

Carney laughed out loud when asked by a reporter about both Trump’s comments made on Monday that he thinks Canada will apologize to the U.S. and Tuesday’s warnings from Navarro.

Asked about the remarks at an event in B.C., Carney shrugged and said: “I take note of both comments, how’s that?” He then added: “No response to either.”

The prime minister instead offered broad comments on the trade relationship with the U.S., saying Canada stands ready to negotiate “in good faith,” a mutually-advantageous trade arrangement “that respects both our countries’ sovereignty.”
 

Ron in Regina

"Voice of the West" Party
Apr 9, 2008
33,104
11,869
113
Regina, Saskatchewan
Recent polling by Strength in Numbers and Verasight paints a dismal picture for Donald Trump and the GOP as they head into the midterms. Trump’s approval rating has fallen to the mid-to-low 30s, driven mostly by plummeting approval with Republicans. In years past, Trump’s approval ratings with Republicans hovered in the high 80s or low 90s. Today, it stands at closer to 70 percent.
1791040976666.jpeg
These numbers are driven by public anger at the state of the economy, the increasing cost of living, and Trump’s poor leadership. A plurality of voters says that this midterm election is a referendum on Trump (who isn’t on the ballot), with independents saying this the most. As a result, the generic congressional ballot favors Democrats by 12 points among registered voters in one poll, and by 11 points among likely voters in another.
With control of the US House of Representatives and the US Senate at stake, Democrats begin October with a surprisingly rosy outlook as more congressional seats are seen as in play.Republicans, meanwhile, appear to be in damage control, pouring millions of dollars into races once seen as secure victories while injecting more funding into a handful of marquee showdowns.

Political trackers have long projected Democrats will take control of the US House of Representatives in the November 3 vote.

Winning a majority in the 435-member chamber from Republicans would give the party renewed legislative power to assert leverage over Trump, while launching investigations into his administration’s dealings. Top Democrats have already signalled that probes into Trump’s family business dealings would be top priorities.
With 30 days left to go, “there’s much more drama in the Senate than the House races” once considered a pipe dream for Democrats, who need a net gain of at least four seats to win a slim majority, the 100-member chamber has moved within a more comfortable striking distance. Unlike in the House, where every seat is up for re-election, only 35 Senate seats are up for grabs in this cycle, creating a far narrower pathway to control.
In 2024, Mr. Trump did well among Hispanic voters, but they’ve soured on him. That will cost Republicans, especially in Texas and Florida. Plus, there’s the usual midterm swing against the president’s party, the unpopular Iran war, gas prices, some dreadful Republican candidates chosen by primary voters (see Texas) and Mr. Trump’s unpopularity, especially on key issues such as affordability. In some states, such as Texas, gerrymanders have spread Republican voters too thinly to survive a big blue wave – another Trump-led campaign strategy that may backfire.

In 2016 and 2024, non-MAGA Republicans stuck with their party and gave Mr. Trump his victories. If the election were held today, Republicans are at about 43 per cent on the “generic ballot,” indicating that many will vote Republican again. Still, non-MAGA Republicans and Republican-leaning Independents are a big portion of the “don’t knows” regarding their 2026 choice. Very few will vote Democrat, and some will stay home or vote for a third party, but there are still unknowns and undecideds.

Polls cannot capture the fact that elections activate partisanship. The most powerful forces in American politics are partisanship (attachment to your party) and negative partisanship (animosity toward the opposition). It’s hard to overstate how little the actual candidates matter to Americans’ voting choices. The closer election day gets, the more voters’ partisan identities kick in and override candidate preferences or dissatisfaction with the president. Republican leaders are counting on partisanship kicking in again this year, but polls won’t capture it.
Political analysts and institutional frameworks suggest that a midterm loss for the Republican party would significantly constrain President Trump's legislative agenda, though his use of executive power would likely trigger intense court battles. A loss of the governing trifecta would establish a divided government, completely shifting the balance of power in Washington.

Trump has given public indications about how he would approach a potential loss. During interviews, he stated that he would act as a "blocker" to veto Democratic legislation for the final two years of his term.

However, historically and behaviorally, a president facing a hostile Congress often relies heavily on executive orders, national emergency declarations, and administrative rule-making to bypass the legislature. Because these unilateral actions frequently test the constitutional limits of executive authority, they inevitably lead to major legal challenges.
 

55Mercury

rigid member
May 31, 2007
4,651
1,229
113
If Trump had just kept doing what he was doing for the first 11 months of his second term then they would probably sweep these elections.
But nooooo!
The idiot had to start sucking BB's nuts'n fuckin'wahoo's dick before the whole world to prove that America is not first but Israel is, needlessly putting American lives at risk for something no American other than a Zionist is interested in.

Too bad the idiot had to let Epstein get the goods on him.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ron in Regina

Ron in Regina

"Voice of the West" Party
Apr 9, 2008
33,104
11,869
113
Regina, Saskatchewan
If Trump had just kept doing what he was doing for the first 11 months of his second term then they would probably sweep these elections.
But nooooo!
The idiot had to start sucking BB's nuts'n fuckin'wahoo's dick before the whole world to prove that America is not first but Israel is, needlessly putting American lives at risk for something no American other than a Zionist is interested in.

Too bad the idiot had to let Epstein get the goods on him.
If Trump had just done what he did in his first term (avoiding involving America in wars, and actually listening to his advisors at least some of the time instead of just surrounding himself with cowardly yes-men there to just stroke his pickle ego) instead in his second term, he would sweep this election that’s coming in the next 30 days…but if your aunt had balls, would she be your uncle?

Epstein and any potential leverage from that paedophile shitstain haven’t forced Trump to bomb Nigeria on Christmas Day, or invade Venezuela, threaten the planet with tariffs, threaten to invade Greenland, the whole Cuba thing, threaten to make Canada to the 51st state & then try to coercively crush it economically to make a point, and slap his name on everything possible while gold-leafing whatever he can reach to make it look like a turn-of-the-century Nevada whorehouse, while deploying US military into American cities in his wacky derangement, and so on and so forth.

Trump has tried to force global economic change through foreign adventurism setting back American foreign diplomacy by generations if not irreparably damaging it, while extorting Greenland and Venezuela and Ukraine and working on doing so with both Canada and Cuba, with Panama and Mexico waiting for their turn…while the American public gets taxed out the wazoo (that he both lies and brags about simultaneously) with this self-inflicted hardship…& they’re still better off than many of the countries that are trying to adapt to the financial hardship inflicted by this 800 pound orange gorilla in the room, while he and his children (& those billionaires that can buy into this administration with their personal bribes) rape the global economy.

Yeah, it could’ve been done very differently in his second term, but it’s not. He’s trying to build a legacy but it’s not gonna be the legacy he thinks it’s going to be, and he will be remembered as worse than either Trudeau combined, but it is what it is.
 

pgs

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 29, 2008
29,433
8,718
113
B.C.
If Trump had just done what he did in his first term (avoiding involving America in wars, and actually listening to his advisors at least some of the time instead of just surrounding himself with cowardly yes-men there to just stroke his pickle ego) instead in his second term, he would sweep this election that’s coming in the next 30 days…but if your aunt had balls, would she be your uncle?

Epstein and any potential leverage from that paedophile shitstain haven’t forced Trump to bomb Nigeria on Christmas Day, or invade Venezuela, threaten the planet with tariffs, threaten to invade Greenland, the whole Cuba thing, threaten to make Canada to the 51st state & then try to coercively crush it economically to make a point, and slap his name on everything possible while gold-leafing whatever he can reach to make it look like a turn-of-the-century Nevada whorehouse, while deploying US military into American cities in his wacky derangement, and so on and so forth.

Trump has tried to force global economic change through foreign adventurism setting back American foreign diplomacy by generations if not irreparably damaging it, while extorting Greenland and Venezuela and Ukraine and working on doing so with both Canada and Cuba, with Panama and Mexico waiting for their turn…while the American public gets taxed out the wazoo (that he both lies and brags about simultaneously) with this self-inflicted hardship…& they’re still better off than many of the countries that are trying to adapt to the financial hardship inflicted by this 800 pound orange gorilla in the room, while he and his children (& those billionaires that can buy into this administration with their personal bribes) rape the global economy.

Yeah, it could’ve been done very differently in his second term, but it’s not. He’s trying to build a legacy but it’s not gonna be the legacy he thinks it’s going to be, and he will be remembered as worse than either Trudeau combined, but it is what it is.
Well there you go , Trump’s support will disappear after the midterms , he will be impeached and jailed and bobs your uncle no more Trump .
 
  • Like
Reactions: 55Mercury

Ron in Regina

"Voice of the West" Party
Apr 9, 2008
33,104
11,869
113
Regina, Saskatchewan
Well there you go , Trump’s support will disappear after the midterms , he will be impeached and jailed and bobs your uncle no more Trump .
Eahhhh….not really. There’s really no mechanism to remove a sitting US president, and while he’s in office (impeachment or not)….there’s conflicting information as to what actually be done to a sitting US president legally….so the next two years will be Democrats trying to stop Trump, and Trump trying to stop the Democrats trying to stop him, lots of executive orders and vetos and lawsuits and court challenges and investigations, declarations of national emergencies that will get cancelled and then vetoed and so on and so forth…It’ll be an absolute shit show.

The U.S. will be hamstrung from two directions and I’m assuming in 2029 it’ll be the Democrats (who are traditionally the party of protectionism and tariffs) with some talking head in the White House. I’m foreseeing Trump’s legacy being not his name over everything, or an expansion of US territory, but a huge rollback on executive authority (Constitutional amendments) by Congress & Senate so this (someone Emperor-like) never happens again for that country, and the rebound on White House interior decorating removing or painting over a whole lot of gold leaf. Hell of a legacy.
 

pgs

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 29, 2008
29,433
8,718
113
B.C.
Eahhhh….not really. There’s really no mechanism to remove a sitting US president, and while he’s in office (impeachment or not)….there’s conflicting information as to what actually be done to a sitting US president legally….so the next two years will be Democrats trying to stop Trump, and Trump trying to stop the Democrats trying to stop him, lots of executive orders and vetos and lawsuits and court challenges and investigations, declarations of national emergencies that will get cancelled and then vetoed and so on and so forth…It’ll be an absolute shit show.

The U.S. will be hamstrung from two directions and I’m assuming in 2029 it’ll be the Democrats (who are traditionally the party of protectionism and tariffs) with some talking head in the White House. I’m foreseeing Trump’s legacy being not his name over everything, or an expansion of US territory, but a huge rollback on executive authority (Constitutional amendments) by Congress & Senate so this (someone Emperor-like) never happens again for that country, and the rebound on White House interior decorating removing or painting over a whole lot of gold leaf. Hell of a legacy.
Remember Nixon .