I chose. I reviewed the evidence, found there was none, and therefore chose not to believe in a god or gods.
Same reason I choose not to believe in fairies, superheroes, and aliens. No evidence.
Is murder morally wrong?
I chose. I reviewed the evidence, found there was none, and therefore chose not to believe in a god or gods.
Same reason I choose not to believe in fairies, superheroes, and aliens. No evidence.
How is it not? Were you born that way? Ideology is a choice, and that is what religion is, an ideology. Just like political ideologies. Nobody is born a Liberal or Conservative. Just like nobody is born a Christian or Muslim or Hindu or whatever. You have to accept and believe the tenets of whatever religion you join and that requires choice. You CHOOSE to believe. Just as I choose NOT to believe.How is religion or any other belief a 'choice?'
I haven't the faintest idea how this is relevant, but I'll answer as soon as you define "murder" and "morally."Is murder morally wrong?
Hey go easy on us dummies we cain't help it cause we be ignernt.I haven't the faintest idea how this is relevant, but I'll answer as soon as you define "murder" and "morally."
Aside from tail-chasing fallacies and tautology, I also can't be bothered to waste my time playing silly games with undefined or ill-defined terms.
Already done it. Now I'm finished.Hey go easy on us dummies we cain't help it cause we be ignernt.
Lady Gaga was. Can you prove Machjo isn't Lady Gaga?How is it not? Were you born that way?
That's what I've always said. Believe what you want, just keep it off my land, outta my face, and outta the civil laws.I'll defend your right to believe in your nonsense, I might mock you for it in the process but I won't deny you the right to believe in it. But I'll fight even harder to prevent anyone from inflicted theirs on me.
I haven't the faintest idea how this is relevant, but I'll answer as soon as you define "murder" and "morally."
Aside from tail-chasing fallacies and tautology, I also can't be bothered to waste my time playing silly games with undefined or ill-defined terms.
The point was as follows. Some people believe that murder is wrong because they believe human life has value, but they take it as faith that human life has value since it is not provable,value being very subjective.
Everyone believes something on faith without being able to prove it. The Universal Declaration of Human Rights itself is based on faith. If someone should challenge the moral premise of that document, no one could defend it scientifically.
Already done it. Now I'm finished.
Lady Gaga was. Can you prove Machjo isn't Lady Gaga?
That's the kind of "reasoning" you can expect around here.
That's what I've always said. Believe what you want, just keep it off my land, outta my face, and outta the civil laws.
It's scientifically proven life has a bias for itself. Progressives call it racism :lol:
Everybody but me.The point was as follows. Some people believe that murder is wrong because they believe human life has value, but they take it as faith that human life has value since it is not provable,value being very subjective.
Everyone believes something on faith without being able to prove it.
Everybody but me.
This fallacy is called "Russell's teapot," after the great philosopher and logician Bertrand Russell. It consists of making a statement, and then claiming that a statement is validated by the fact that it cannot be conclusively disproven.Given that the existence of God is scientifically neither provable nor disprovable as far as I can tell, believing either would need to be on faith.
I feel about god or gods exactly the way I feel about fairies. Both of them are found in old books, both of them have a large number of adherents, and neither of them is supported by a scintilla of evidence.So I take it you're strictly irreligious and simply have no belief concernig whether or not God exists and have no care to know?
This fallacy is called "Russell's teapot," after the great philosopher and logician Bertrand Russell. It consists of making a statement, and then claiming that a statement is validated by the fact that it cannot be conclusively disproven.
Why don't you believe in fairies and space aliens, Machjo? You can't disprove them either.
I feel about god or gods exactly the way I feel about fairies. Both of them are found in old books, both of them have a large number of adherents, and neither of them is supported by a scintilla of evidence.
I believe on faith that there is life on other planets.
Do you believe there is life on other planets, Tec?
However, I used to believe in god and DID wake up one day and realized it's all bullroar. To make that leap of faith, or non-faith, is a choice.The point is this. When I used to not believe in God, it wasn't like I woke up one day and decided not to believe in God.
Nope.I believe on faith that there is life on other planets.
Do you believe there is life on other planets, Tec?
Nope.
However, I used to believe in god and DID wake up one day and realized it's all bullroar. To make that leap of faith, or non-faith, is a choice.
What? Could you clarify please?Based on what proof?
What? Could you clarify please?
No, wait. I think I get it. You decided that "I don't believe there is life on other planets" is the same thing as "I believe there is no life on other planets.
Sorry, I reject your false dichotomy. But keep the fallacies coming! It's a good review.
What? Could you clarify please?
No, wait. I think I get it. You decided that "I don't believe there is life on other planets" is the same thing as "I believe there is no life on other planets.
Sorry, I reject your false dichotomy. But keep the fallacies coming! It's a good review.