Obama named SmogMaker of 2007

Avro

Time Out
Feb 12, 2007
7,815
65
48
55
Oshawa


Obama named SmogMaker of 2007

4 Jan 08
Prize honors those who sow confusion and delay on Climate Change

Presidential hopeful Barack Obama has captured the inaugural 2007 SmogMaker Award for blowing smoke on global warming, the DeSmogBlog announced today.
Global warming is an environmental problem, not a political one. And people who try to ‘solve’ it with political or public relations spin are just making the problem worse,” said James Hoggan, co-founder of the DeSmogBlog.
“Yet the spin campaign continues, and it’s becoming more insidious. Climate spin used to be all about denial – self-appointed experts took money from the energy industry and then denied that humans are affecting life on earth.
But the new spin is even more dangerous and sly. Now, it’s all about delay and distraction. Now, spindoctors in industry and government are acknowledging the science, but arguing that we shouldn’t or can’t act quickly to correct the problem.”
Barack Obama may not be the worst offender among the spinmeisters, but he’s the biggest disappointment.
An outspoken supporter of the U.S. coal industry, Obama has presented himself as someone who can overcome the Bush legacy of inaction on climate change. But he is campaigning on a greenhouse gas reduction ‘target’ that the U.S. won’t have to meet for 42 years and he has continued to promote the current administration’s plan to circumvent the Kyoto Protocol, the only international climate agreement currently in place.
The world has a right to expect more from a man who wants to be the Democratic candidate for President of the United States,” Hoggan said.
This is the first year for the SmogMaker Awards, honoring those who have subverted honest and forthright public conversation on global warming.
Judged by an expert panel of fraudbusters – the staff at the climate change watchdog DeSmogBlog.com – these awards recognize clever, deceptive or merely devious public relations campaigns.
The winners have distinguished themselves in five categories:


Individual
After nearly two full terms of a Republican President who sponsored climate-science censorship, the world has been looking forward to any successor as an improvement.
But on climate change, Barack Obama, is looking like George Bush lite.
While the world’s leading scientific bodies tell us we need to act immediately to avoid catastrophic climate disruption, Obama has set his own target date at 2050, long past any opportunity for voters to hold him accountable. His short-term strategy is the same as President Bush’s; Obama wants to create a new Global Energy Forum that doesn’t include the cleanest and most progressive (European) economies.
If Obama wants to be taken seriously on climate change, he has to stop promoting coal and start setting realistic, urgent strategies.

Industry
Toyota made itself the world’s No.1 carmaker by producing energy-efficient models, but nevertheless joined the car consortium that sued California – and 5 other state governments – for legislating lower emission levels. (Why give up the competitive advantage – or save the Earth – when profits are on the line?)

Government
You can’t beat the Canadian government for environmental hypocrisy.
Having signed an international agreement that committed the country to reducing its CO2 emissions by 6 per cent from 1990 levels, Canada increased its annual output by 35 per cent. Now, the Canadian government has joined the world’s biggest polluters to block, divert, or minimize any new global warming agreements.
In fact, notwithstanding that it is one of the wealthiest countries in the world, and one of the top five per-capita polluters, Canada says it won’t lift a finger against climate change unless the big emitters in the developing world first commit to taking action.


Media
News baron Rupert Murdoch startled the world in May of this year by announcing that he is worried about climate change and determined to bring his worldwide News Corp. into the international battle for better performance and better policy.
Yet his Fox News still employs the likes of climate quibbler Brit Hume and Steve Milloy, a PR guy who went from defending tobacco on behalf of Philip Morris to questioning climate change on behalf of the energy industry.
The idea that a man who created an entire right-of-centre network is now standing back in protection of journalistic independence is beyond quaint.

“Non-Profit”
Bjorn Lomborg’s Copenhagen Consensus offers the best example of how climate quibblers are now playing the public for fools.
By accepting the science behind climate change as early as 2004, Lomborg presented himself as a climate moderate. Then he launched an international campaign to distract public policy makers by understating the potential devastation of climate change, while setting up a false choice between spending money addressing global warming or spending instead on eradicating poverty or AIDS.

http://www.desmogblog.com/obama-named-smogmaker-of-2007
 

MikeyDB

House Member
Jun 9, 2006
4,612
63
48
Now now Avro surely you understand that people can vote and change government don't you? You can "vote" (unless of course the election is rigged like any other banana republic so often wailed about by Americans)... Sure a vote for Obama will change things...sure it will....

Get out there and vote but first of all get down and pray.... between god and the American electoral process everything will be OK tomorrow....
 

Tonington

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 27, 2006
15,441
150
63
DeSmog Blog should do their homework. If they read Obama's plan they would know he sets both short and long term targets, 1990 levels by 2020, and 80% reductions below 1990 levels by 2050.

His plan, the first amongst the Presidential hopefuls to make strong statements( whether or not he can deliver is another story) states that he would ban traditional coal facilities.

Giving that award to Obama, when Bush, Lomborg, or Inhoffe are surely more deserving is strange for a blog like DeSmog.
 

normbc9

Electoral Member
Nov 23, 2006
483
14
18
California
I sure liked the way Obama blacktopped Hillary in the Iowa Caucus' and it is only one time but lets sit back and see what Oprah has in store. Politics in the US is now a true circus and regardless of what side you are on in this topic there is a whole new industry being built for this reason. I'm sure when it is developed Dick Cheney will be a majority holder of the action in the US. He isn't an environmentalist but he is in every sense of the word a truly ruthless capitalist. When money shows Cheney is there shortly thereafter.
 
Last edited:

darkbeaver

the universe is electric
Jan 26, 2006
41,035
201
63
RR1 Distopia 666 Discordia


!

of Whales and Worms: The 2008 Elections
Dennis Loo
CounterPunch
Mon, 16 Jun 2008 21:42 EDT








Many people regard Obama's upcoming nomination for president as a sign that change is underway and that the nightmare of Bush and Cheney will be over beginning in late January 2009. New York Times columnist Frank Rich, for example, sees Obama's emergence as a changing of the guard. Others have cited Obama's campaign as indicative of millennials beginning to take the political stage. Millions are pleased that finally an African-American is going to be nominated by one of the two major parties and see this as in and of itself a step forward.
For the well-meaning people who are feeling this way, I have this question: How can the same Democratic Party, and the same specific individuals, who have co-operated in, permitted and/or legalized the Bush regime's atrocities - including torture and war crimes - now tell us that the candidate that they endorse is the solution to the horrid things that this system and these individuals have themselves facilitated and colluded in?
This is like th
http://www.sott.net/articles/show/159649-Of-Whales-and-Worms-The-2008-Elections

We're talking about the head of state of the most powerful country in a world in which the richest 451 individuals have more wealth than the bottom half - more than 3 billion people - of the world's population combined. We're talking about the president of an empire that spans the globe and that has over 700 military bases abroad. We're talking about the commander and chief of a country that spends more on its military than all of the other countries in the world combined. We're talking about an immense bureaucracy that rests upon and exists to protect and expand that empire. We're talking about a campaign for president that has lasted over fifteen months to date and that has required a quarter million dollars per day per candidate to be sustained.