Obama Disses Another Ally

waldo

House Member
Oct 19, 2009
3,042
0
36
You're an alarmists. Plain and simple. What is there to discuss? Does the term offend you?

what's not, as you say, "plain and simple" is how you use that label. You refuse to actually define it... you refuse to state the basis for who/what you apply it to. You appear to use the label most indiscriminately and the fact you repeatedly refuse to answer these related questions on your usage of the label is quite telling. I've been challenged on my use of the label "denier" and I've responded very precisely in what the label means... I've also emphasized I don't use the label "denier" as a pejorative. Again, why do you so struggle with answering questions concerning your use of the label "Alarmist"?

Just keep making those excuses for China.

just the facts, Jack... just the facts! No excuses are being made for any country... China needs to reduce its emissions; however, apparently, to you, providing a historical perspective on accumulated atmospheric CO2 emissions... those currently in the atmosphere... is "making excuses for China". You're not trying to make excuses for the U.S. historical accumulated emissions... are you? Say it ain't so!
 

EagleSmack

Hall of Fame Member
Feb 16, 2005
44,168
96
48
USA
what's not, as you say, "plain and simple" is how you use that label. You refuse to actually define it... you refuse to state the basis for who/what you apply it to. You appear to use the label most indiscriminately and the fact you repeatedly refuse to answer these related questions on your usage of the label is quite telling. I've been challenged on my use of the label "denier" and I've responded very precisely in what the label means... I've also emphasized I don't use the label "denier" as a pejorative. Again, why do you so struggle with answering questions concerning your use of the label "Alarmist"?


There is no struggle. You know what an alarmist is and you are one of them.


Plain and simple.



just the facts, Jack... just the facts! No excuses are being made for any country... China needs to reduce its emissions; however, apparently, to you, providing a historical perspective on accumulated atmospheric CO2 emissions... those currently in the atmosphere... is "making excuses for China". You're not trying to make excuses for the U.S. historical accumulated emissions... are you? Say it ain't so!


That's right... I'm not. I could care less about historical AND current US emissions. Feel cheated?


But go on keep making excuses for China. That is typical for alarmists like yourself.