Someone said that a recent decision has affirmed that it is unlawful to sign away the aboriginal rights of your children?
I am wondering what that means?
For example, if a great grandmother was metis, but married to a non-indian. Currently, the great grandchildren are 1/8th metis but probably aren't recognized as anything. They certainly aren't recognized by any of the bands. Additionally, the government hasn't even recognized them as non-status indians.
Will any of the recent decisions allow them to identify themselves with their history, possibly regain some of the more fundamental of aboriginal rights such as fishing without having to buy a fishing license from the gov?
I am wondering what that means?
For example, if a great grandmother was metis, but married to a non-indian. Currently, the great grandchildren are 1/8th metis but probably aren't recognized as anything. They certainly aren't recognized by any of the bands. Additionally, the government hasn't even recognized them as non-status indians.
Will any of the recent decisions allow them to identify themselves with their history, possibly regain some of the more fundamental of aboriginal rights such as fishing without having to buy a fishing license from the gov?
Last edited: