Are we a bit cranky this evening?
Because you got a taste of your own meds?
Are we a bit cranky this evening?
Speaking of meds, have you tried Midol?Because you got a taste of your own meds?
Speaking of meds, have you tried Midol?
Not meaning to get into your business, but you might wanna consider "heavy flow" this month.Is that the preferred meds of perpetual victims like you?
Wouldn't know anything about that.Not meaning to get into your business, but you might wanna consider "heavy flow" this month.
Gotta dam the Red River Valley or the town'll get washed away.Wouldn't know anything about that.
You seem to have a lot of experience with it.
I hope you feel better.
There have been all kinds of transgressions committed by sports heroes and the
problem is there has been no consistency. There has to be a hard set of rules
established then you can start banning players and not before. Personally I think
the guy is a scumbag is as low as it gets however if you are going down the road
the rules have to be defined and a start date with a set of rules that apply to all.
Not meaning to get into your business, but you might wanna consider "heavy flow" this month.
Just some friendly advice.Be nice, boys or I'll have to close the sand box!
Said it before, I'll say it again. The NFL is an entertainment company. Like all entertainment companies, it responds to the demands of its audience, or it loses money. That's why Disney is showing more and more non-white and female heroes in its movies, that's why "Two and a Half Men" kicked Charlie Sheen to the curb, that's why you rarely see people smoking on television or in the movies anymore, and that's why the NFL is disciplining players who use drugs or commit crimes. The NFL is responding to its paying customers.This has all gone so overboard that its become a joke. Is GM or Ford or U.S. Steel responsible for the acts of its employees. Are they required to have internal tribunals that respond to public outrage in things for which they are not responsible for inciting or supporting.. but are the private and willful acts of employees who are hired for a specific professional job. How can the NFL guarantee their personal conduct. That's what we have a justice system for.
How could a conservative possibly object to an entertainment company responding to its customers' demands?
Why? What did O.J. Simpson do?As long as the statue of OJ Simpson stands at the NFL Hall of Fame, we can tell that none of this is about anything other than image and $$$$.
Yup. And then tells me that I need to "grow up".
Can't imagine why he's got his panties all in a twist.
Said it before, I'll say it again. The NFL is an entertainment company. Like all entertainment companies, it responds to the demands of its audience, or it loses money. That's why Disney is showing more and more non-white and female heroes in its movies, that's why "Two and a Half Men" kicked Charlie Sheen to the curb, that's why you rarely see people smoking on television or in the movies anymore, and that's why the NFL is disciplining players who use drugs or commit crimes. The NFL is responding to its paying customers.
How could a conservative possibly object to an entertainment company responding to its customers' demands?
..... AS LONG as you continue to do the job you are paid for!
Or perhaps it is, according to the deal worked out between the NFL and the NFLPA (the players' union).Some people are just in that mode continuously...................to their detriment, no one else's -
Unless you are in the ethics or morals industry or are proven to be a public menace, perhaps what you do off the job is none of the employer's business AS LONG as you continue to do the job you are paid for!
Or perhaps it is, according to the deal worked out between the NFL and the NFLPA (the players' union).
When Charlie Sheen was arrested on drug and domestic violence charges, he was cut by his very popular show "Two and a Half Men." That's just one example. It's the entertainment industry. Everything from Ray Rice and Adrian Peterson to the Beatles cutting Pete Best for Ringo. The industry responds to customer demand.What JLM fails to understand is that the NFL doesn't care what Rice did, only that it reflects negatively on the NFL.
I'm sure the league is within its rights to suspend Rice just light Baseball was within its rights to suspend Pete Rose. All Pete did was gamble on baseball which isn't even illegal.