New York Times Apologizes for Its Irresponsible Campaign Coverage
- Thread starter EagleSmack
- Start date
I suppose they were just telling their subscribers what they wanted to hear and what they wanted to happen.
They were wrong as were the polls.
They were wrong as were the polls.
Well mea culpa and all that, eh.
Did you happen to catch this one, Eagle..
The one scenario that could still get Hillary into the White House | New York Post
Last edited:
www.youtube.com/watch?v=pDZR-t0Vr7E
ooops, here is the interview
Just imho, but i don't think it was a mistake - the polls were technically weighted on purpose to give hillary a "push"
i think it was yellow journalism
re faithless electors
the clinton death list might swing a few votes
ooops, here is the interview
Just imho, but i don't think it was a mistake - the polls were technically weighted on purpose to give hillary a "push"
i think it was yellow journalism
re faithless electors
the clinton death list might swing a few votes
The Level of I-Told-You-So is immeasurable.
If they had only not listened to the polls which were so wrong, they may not be so salty today.
Giving Hillary a 'push' might have contributed to her loss. If people thought the election was already in the bag they might not have made the effort to get out and vote.
I guess they realize there is a new market outside of New York, Boston, Chicago, and LA.
Go figure.