NATO Air Strike Kills 12 Children in Afghanistan

gerryh

Time Out
Nov 21, 2004
25,756
295
83
They're very lucky people that they have a country that believes in trying to limit civilian casualties.


Oh yes, extremely lucky. :roll:


There are plenty of people in Afghanistan and Pakistan who know someone that is a terrorist. While they don't work to actively help them they don't lift a finger to have them arrested by the police. So if they sympathize with terrorists then I don't have much pity for them. If we can manage to root out terrorists among us, so can they, they choose to be corrupt police, corrupt politicians, corrupt military personnel and neighbours who choose to look away when they know what they see and know what is going to happen to other civilian women and children.

I assume, that since you are making the definitive statements that you can back them up? Or are you just talking out your ass to support your blind support of war? I'm betting on the latter.

Now I know that it's just not fair to ask Afghans and Pakistanis to do the same as us but they too should just buck up. If they don't want sh!t they shouldn't start sh!t.

So tell me unf, what sh it did these particular people start?

Maybe telling assholes they can't use you're house as a base to hide from our military who has to go there to track these guys down. Maybe choosing not to be a scumbag and run hide behind women and children then cry with great inconsolable sorrow when they get blown up in the fire fight.

Riiiight, so you're suggesting that they choose who they want to be killed by.
 

Unforgiven

Force majeure
May 28, 2007
6,770
137
63
"If they don't want sh!t they shouldn't start sh!t.".....

Tell that to NATO, and Americans in general. What goes around will surely come around ie the revenge attacks of 9/11.

Well let's talk about the sh!t NATO and Americans start if you want. I don't mind peeling the cap off out own dirty secrets and in the process we can include some of the garbage that is done which often results in foreign troops having to occupy an area or country just to keep the commerce going that supports these party wreckers.

Yep, real lucky to get bombed regularly. :roll:

Well there is that old saying, "you mess with the bull you get the horns." Some people should really take that to heart.

Your too funny. That sounds just like the good old US of A.

No doubt man, but the difference is our morality tells most of us it's wrong rather than something to aspire to.
So are you suggesting that there is no corruption in either Afghanistan and Pakistan or are you saying that it's excusable because of who and what they are?

Oh yes, extremely lucky. :roll:

Compared to some past military invasions, this one is taking great care in who it harms not to mention the aid and nation building that comes along with the mission is far and away better than any that have come before it. Lucky yeah, it would have been easier and cheaper just to melt every person that stuck their head six inches above ground and turn what's left over to the most aggressive warlord that remained as long as they swore allegiance to our government.

I assume, that since you are making the definitive statements that you can back them up? Or are you just talking out your ass to support your blind support of war? I'm betting on the latter.

I see you have nothing to go on other than insults to support your point. How about this time instead, you know, for a change, you actually come up with some reasoned points than just telling me how stupid you think I am? You can do that can't you?

So tell me unf, what sh it did these particular people start?

Either you know and hope I won't be able to point it out, or you don't know and hope I don't either or you're in denial of what is happening in the world around you. Which ever is the case, do what you can to make a point and I will argue mine in relation.

Riiiight, so you're suggesting that they choose who they want to be killed by.

Or not to be killed at all. Of course there is always that option though for some people, it fails on the "I need pity" persona so often held up like a crutch of solidarity. If less effort went into getting themselves into trouble and more into getting themselves a better standard of living, they wouldn't feel the need to be constantly sucking welfare out of the West.
 

ironsides

Executive Branch Member
Feb 13, 2009
8,583
60
48
United States
So why are we prosecuting this war at all then? AQ obviously were after a few specific targets in the WTC but had trouble distinguishing 1 white guy from another so just killed them all. Seems to be a legitimate defense according to this case.

What a f*cking joke of an excuse!!! 'They all look the same so we killed them all'

We are not protesting the war. As for the WTC we were not at war.
 

JBeee

Time Out
Jun 1, 2007
1,826
52
48
"As for the WTC we were not at war."....

Not so long as your state-run media were able to fool you lot prior, keeping it under cover, the mass slaughtering and atrocities perpetrated by your gov. Everything was fine in the world (ignorance was bliss) till those suffering at your gov`s hands decided enough was enough and brought it home to you. Then all of a sudden your media weren`t able to hide your gov`s terrorism over-seas and like headless chickens, Americans were running around in shock and awe on 9/11 wondering why. Still to this day, most Americans swallow hook, line and sinker, what it`s gov. dictates to it`s state-television to report what it wants you to believe. lol


We are not protesting the war. As for the WTC we were not at war.