Nation-wide anti-Trudeau campaign launched by grassroots anti-abortion activists
- Thread starter Locutus
- Start date
and why are they single moms cliffy?
Of course, what WAS I thinking. The obvious answer is to kill the child. Of course. :roll:
So you're saying that it's better to kill unwanted people. Seems that's been tried by many different states in the history of man for a multitude of reasons.
I have a novel, and obviously untried, solution. How about those that don't want to have children, not get pregnant, and those not willing to adjust their lifestyle to ensure they don't get pregnant, take responsibility for their actions and not kill the result of their actions. It's not like everyone doesn't know where babies come from.
all these so called pro-lifers are a joke. they aren't very pro-life at all when you really get to know their opinions
we already know abortion is good for society. this is an unequivocal fact. imagine every unwanted child being forced to be born , what the hell are you going to do with them all?
the bottom line is woman should have the choice to decide what to do with their baby, not some mental cases who base their opinions on a hypocritical patriarchal religions.
the bottom line is woman should have the choice to decide what to do with their baby, not some mental cases who base their opinions on a hypocritical patriarchal religions.
Then why stop there? Why not allow woman to decide on their babies life no matter what the age? Why are all these women being charged with murder for exercising their "rights"?
Good for the Campaign Life Coalition Youth.
In Washington on the January anniversary of the Roe v Wade Decision in 1973 an annual Pro Life March draws 500,000+ from all over the States and all over the World. It is routinely ignored and blacked out by the mainstream press but has grown steadily since its inception. Most of its participants now are young people, and especially young women who have discarded the contradictary rhetoric of the pro abortionists. There are no marches to support Abortion. The days of Feminist Bra Burnings disappeared as soon as they began in the early 70s.
Justin Trudeau is on the wrong side of history. He assumes he has the ear and support of the women of Canada.. but abortion is something deeply distressing to women.. a matter of shame, regret, severe health and psychological repercussions for those who have been through one.. and something whose effects on society are profoundly disassembling. Many ignore that issue, and deem it 'settled' law.. but it is too culturally catastrophic in its implications to ignore
Real women value as sacrosanct the role of motherhood.. and are not fooled by the nonsense illogic that the right to murder their unborn children offers them any sort of authentic freedom. It in fact imprisons them in a false notion of freedom which loses all meaning in the absence of commensurate acceptance of responsibility for the welfare of others.. notably their own children.
I think Justin is self destructing... his intellect is empty of any comprehensive and integrated moral, cultural and societal vision. He's just a collection of canned platitudes aimed at supposed demographic stereotypes.
In Washington on the January anniversary of the Roe v Wade Decision in 1973 an annual Pro Life March draws 500,000+ from all over the States and all over the World. It is routinely ignored and blacked out by the mainstream press but has grown steadily since its inception. Most of its participants now are young people, and especially young women who have discarded the contradictary rhetoric of the pro abortionists. There are no marches to support Abortion. The days of Feminist Bra Burnings disappeared as soon as they began in the early 70s.
Justin Trudeau is on the wrong side of history. He assumes he has the ear and support of the women of Canada.. but abortion is something deeply distressing to women.. a matter of shame, regret, severe health and psychological repercussions for those who have been through one.. and something whose effects on society are profoundly disassembling. Many ignore that issue, and deem it 'settled' law.. but it is too culturally catastrophic in its implications to ignore
Real women value as sacrosanct the role of motherhood.. and are not fooled by the nonsense illogic that the right to murder their unborn children offers them any sort of authentic freedom. It in fact imprisons them in a false notion of freedom which loses all meaning in the absence of commensurate acceptance of responsibility for the welfare of others.. notably their own children.
I think Justin is self destructing... his intellect is empty of any comprehensive and integrated moral, cultural and societal vision. He's just a collection of canned platitudes aimed at supposed demographic stereotypes.
Last edited:
because believe it or not there is quite a big difference in a 7 year old and a fetus. so just because abortions are permitted doesn't equate to allowing older children to be killed.
and what would the difference be between a 36 week fetus and a one week old baby?
anyone woman decides they want an abortion does so well before 36 weeks, which it isn't even safe to do so at that point.
This is the social conservative movement inflaming the issues of the past
They are not into having religious assets seized under proceeds of crime
for the indiscretions of the preachers priest and whoever does bad things
I bet. No its not only Catholic Priests it takes place in all religions.
They will fail Cliffy is right on that. Besides there are more current issues
than returning again and again to the same old same old.
It is a right under Supreme Court ruling therefore a woman has as much right
to an abortion as someone having a broken leg. It is a legal procedure and
has equal merit. Some people want to impose their will on others that is why
we have a Supreme Court. That court ruled get over it
They are not into having religious assets seized under proceeds of crime
for the indiscretions of the preachers priest and whoever does bad things
I bet. No its not only Catholic Priests it takes place in all religions.
They will fail Cliffy is right on that. Besides there are more current issues
than returning again and again to the same old same old.
It is a right under Supreme Court ruling therefore a woman has as much right
to an abortion as someone having a broken leg. It is a legal procedure and
has equal merit. Some people want to impose their will on others that is why
we have a Supreme Court. That court ruled get over it
This has nothing to do with religion, so take your hard on in hand and take care of it yourself. This is all about people not taking responsibility for their own actions and punishing, with death, the product of their actions. A baby.
Canada allows an abortion right up to birth. I asked what the difference was between a fetus of 36 weeks and a 1 week old baby. YOU were the one that decided to distinguish between a "fetus" and a "baby".
there are no abortions that late because it's unsafe for the mother, that's the only difference. a mother would decide well before that to get an abortion anyways.
I realize I am wasting my time trying too explain anything to someone who is so emotionally attached to their opinions, but here goes. Most single moms that I know were abandoned by the father just prior to or after the birth of their child. Most thought they had found their soul mate and believed that they were going to be together to raise their family. One was not even aware she was pregnant until it was too late to abort and the father had already abandoned her. None that I know of were the result of one night stands. So, stuff your self righteous condemnation.
Oh, and by the way, Harpo had said right from the beginning that, not only was abortion not on the table but that his people were not to speak of it. He has always kept total control of his caucus. Now Trudeau comes out and says the same thing to his people and the Cons all get their panties in knot. Your changing parties was a waste of time because you will not get any farther with you crazed crusade with the Cons.
Last edited:
You mean. . . they get less than one sixth of one percent of the population? Wow, sounds like a grassroots groundswell to me.
You keep it up, coldstream. Punish those sl uts for being sl uts!
Good to see you coming out and showing everyone exactly what you think. Getting pregnant has nothing to do with being a "sl ut", unlike your unfortunate view. Getting pregnant and then getting an abortion is all about not taking responsibility for ones actions.
We really should let the pregnant ones decide as in a ham and egg breakfast-the chicken was "involved' but the pig was'committed".Some may have huge mental & emotional problems while others are not bothered.Religion is part of our superstitious past for any thinking person-so it does not adjust the abortion equation.It also does not help, religions unrealistic ban on birth -control.There are things we may never know-but whether a not yet biologically stable life feels discomfort or emotion on termination is something we can never know.As viable humanns we are all going to face it at our death.It must be balanced on the side of the person responsible for the years of continuing care for that life.Counselling to give it up for adoption or keep it -is also the pregnant women's choices.