My grandmother, the ONLY person who dared stand up to Churchill

Blackleaf

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 9, 2004
49,923
1,908
113
New movie Darkest Hour follows Britain's great wartime leader Winston Churchill in his early days as Prime Minister as Hitler closes in on Britain and highlights the pivotal role of his wife Clementine. Their granddaughter Emma Soames says it's about time that Clementine's role was recognised...

My grandmother, the ONLY person who dared stand up to Winston: As the acclaimed movie Darkest Hour finally highlights the pivotal role of Churchill’s wife Clementine, their granddaughter EMMA SOAMES says it's about time too




By Emma Soames, granddaughter of Winston and Clementine
13 January 2018
Daily Mail

The earliest vivid memory I have of my grandmother Clementine Churchill is of her sitting up in her beautiful four-poster bed, her hair perfectly groomed and wearing something glamorous that certainly did not look slept in.

My mother and I — then all of the age of four — would walk up the hill from our home at Chartwell Farm to visit Clementine while she enjoyed breakfast in bed, eating toast and marmalade and reading the newspapers in a pair of white gloves to protect her hands from printers’ ink.

With my mother Mary — the youngest of Clementine’s five children — perched on the end of the bed, they would talk of grown up matters, while I played around in her boudoir, an elegantly decorated dressing room with chintz at the windows. On her table, there was scented powder in glass bowls and lipsticks aligned in perfect order — all of them banned from my attentions.


The Churchill family on the Pink Terrace at Chartwell, Kent, from left to right: Duncan and Diana Sandys, Julian Sandys, Emma Soames, Churchill, Nicholas Soames, Winston Churchill, Mrs Churchill, Arabella Churchil and Randolph Churchill in 1951


Or I would wander on to the terrace outside her bedroom that commanded the glorious views of the Weald of Kent.

Later, I realised this morning ritual was, for my grandmother, a moment of respite from a daily life packed with great events and demands as she fulfilled the role of loving consort to the extraordinary man she’d married 45 years earlier.

My grandfather, Sir Winston Churchill, was then 79 and in his second and final term as prime minister.

Much of what Clementine endured, both personally and as the wife of Winston, would have pole-axed a lesser woman. But luckily for him — and, indeed, for all of us — she was so much more than a dutiful wife.

And now at last she is portrayed as a powerful force in her own right, in the new film, Darkest Hour, which looks afresh at the events of 1940 when Churchill became PM, and all his worst fears about the rise of Nazi Germany — about which he had warned throughout the Thirties — come to fruition.

Gary Oldman delivers an Oscar-worthy performance in which he inhabits, rather than plays, my grandfather, but he is matched in uncanny resemblance and bearing by Kristin Scott Thomas as Clementine. Scott Thomas captures her rather rigid posture, her nervous tics at moments of tension, and her elegant style.

The affection between them is vividly brought to life in charming scenes where Churchill is more puppy than bulldog and Clementine an affectionate playmate. For our family it is thrilling to see her no longer in the shadows, but rather as my grandfather’s confidante and cheerleader — and also his equal.


The Prime Minister Winston Churchill and his wife, Clementine, sit on board a naval auxiliary patrol vessel as it travels down the Thames towards docks in east London on 25 September 1940


In 1908, aged just 23, she had committed herself to a complex and brilliant man with a love of action, whose ambitions were high but whose early career was uncertain. His personal sense of destiny was only fully vindicated when he became Britain’s wartime leader.

In the course of their 57-year marriage, Clementine saw Winston through desperate days of political humiliation and disfavour, episodes of the ‘black dog’ — the crippling depression and self-doubt that haunted him periodically — and the tragic loss of the fourth of their five children, Marigold, who died aged three.

And of course, she was at his side through the war years when his need for support was never greater.

So who was this woman, whom history has rather consigned to the wings, unfairly diminished by the long shadow cast by her husband, and whose impact, until now, never been fully portrayed on film?

Clementine Hozier was born in 1885, the daughter of Blanche and Colonel Henry Hozier. Her father was a thorough scoundrel, whose business activities at Lloyd’s were regarded with horror even in those unregulated days. Privately he was a bully and an authoritarian — his children were terrified of him.

Even before their separation, the Hoziers had what would now be called an open marriage, and their four children (Kitty, Clementine and twins Nelly and Dick) are assumed to have been fathered by Blanche Hozier’s several lovers. (She once boasted that she was juggling ten men at once.)

Clementine’s father is thought to have been Bertie Mitford, Lord Redesdale, grandfather of the famous Mitford sisters.

Following her divorce, Blanche Hozier took her children to live in Dieppe where, as a foreign, titled beauty, she embraced the bohemian lifestyle of a group of expat writers and artists which included Oscar Wilde.

But this idyll came to a sad end in 1900 when her eldest daughter and Clementine’s confidante, Kitty, died of tuberculosis. The heartbroken Blanche moved back to England where the family lived in a state of impoverished gentility in Hertfordshire.

Clementine attended Berkhamsted High School for Girls at a time when girls of her class were usually taught by governesses. As a result, Clementine was far better educated than many of her peers. She also mixed with girls from a variety of social backgrounds, another rarity in those far-off days, which stood her in great stead as the wife of an MP.


Kristin Scott Thomas and Gary Oldman star as Clementine and Winston Churchill in director Joe Wright's Darkest Hour

She first met my grandfather in 1904 at a society ball where he was, uncharacteristically, dumbstruck by her beauty. She was not impressed by his small stature or his silence and soon escaped to dance with someone else.

Their next meeting, in 1908, was more auspicious when Winston arrived late to a dinner party to find Clementine Hozier seated next to him.

He was enamoured from the start — here was a girl, not just of great beauty but also intelligence, one whom he could talk to rather than just worship from afar. She was more guarded but increasingly captivated as he lay siege to her by daily letters.

Soon after, during a weekend at Blenheim Palace, Winston’s birthplace and home of his grandfather, the Duke of Marlborough, he proposed to her. She wrote to his mother Jennie: ‘I feel no one can know him without being dominated by his charm and brilliancy.’
Their early married life was idyllic and their love for one another shines through their letters.

Clementine proved to be an eager student of politics and was thrilled by her husband’s work, first as president of the Board Of Trade and then as home secretary. In the first two years of their marriage there were two babies, and she fought the first of 14 election campaigns at his side.

Winston was most definitely a rising political star — until the disaster of the Gallipoli campaign in World War I. In 1915, as First Lord Of The Admiralty, Churchill wanted to open a second front away from the massacre of the trenches in France and Belgium.

He boldly proposed to thread his naval fleet through the needle of the Dardanelles, the narrow 38-mile strait in north west Turkey.

However, Turkish troops — allied to Germany — trapped Allied forces on the beaches of the Gallipoli peninsula. It cost 250,000 lives on both sides with the Anzacs — troops from Australia and New Zealand — bearing the brunt.


In the course of their 57-year marriage, Clementine saw Winston through desperate days of political humiliation and disfavour


Fairly or unfairly, Churchill became the scapegoat as the government was thrown into crisis, and the Liberal Prime Minister, H. H. Asquith, was forced to bring the opposition Conservatives into a coalition government. Winston was sidelined to a nominal position of Privy Counsellor where he had no power to influence the direction of the war. He was humiliated and frustrated, and the couple were vilifed by political colleagues, the Press and the public.

Clementine was at her best when things were going badly: she wrote a passionate letter to Asquith pleading for Winston to remain at the Admiralty. It resulted in a furious row with the PM’s wife, Margot Asquith, who regarded the letter as an act of gross disloyalty to the government.

In her diaries, Margot reports saying to Clementine at the end of their shouting match: ‘You are a hard little thing and very very foolish as you will do harm to [Winston’s] career.’ She told her husband that Clementine had shrieked at her ‘like a fishwife’.

Fiercely loyal she may have been, but Clementine was also sharply critical of her husband when no one else dared, and would rip into him if his standards of behaviour slipped.

She once wrote him a stern letter when she judged he had been rude to his secretaries. She was also infuriated by his extravagance, and in the new film berates him for not providing funds to pay the household bills.



Nor did she hold back from expressing political opinions that did not coincide with his — most vehemently over the Abdication. Churchill supported Edward VIII’s right to remain on the throne even with divorcee Wallis Simpson as his Queen Consort, while Clementine took the side of history and saw that the king had to abdicate.

The long years of their marriage passed through many stormy waters, particularly the so-called Wilderness Years in the Thirties when the appeasers were in the political ascendancy. The Churchills were ostracised by many — including his own party. He was regarded as a renegade and class traitor for his fervent opposition to Hitler.

In their personal life, I have always been amazed by Clementine’s acceptance of Winston buying Chartwell, an 81-acre Kent estate, in 1922. Dating from Tudor times, it had dark Victorian interior decor and was infested with earwigs, but it was presented to her as a fait accompli.

She later said that it was the only time intheir marriage when Winston was less than candid with her. Chartwell was their home for 40 years.

The truth was that my grandmother was not a country person. Her idea of a country walk took her as far as the croquet lawn — a game she played with vicious aplomb — and she tolerated pets as long as others looked after them.

For years, the Churchills lived hand to mouth as they embarked on extensive building work at Chartwell. In the Thirties, they were dependent on bank loans given against Winston’s next book or article. But although he wrote prodigiously, their spending often outran his income. At one point they even considered moving elsewhere and letting out the house.

Even in the Fifties, when I remember it, Chartwell was run like a proper old-fashioned Edwardian house — with domestic help and always a very good cook. There was an office of charming secretaries to deal with the huge number of letters and telegrams that poured in and out of the house. As children we loved to pop in and fiddle with the paperclips; the tags used to hold final versions of his speeches and, best of all, the red labels which read ‘Action This Day’.

By the time I was born, the fears over how Clementine might pay the butcher’s bill were over, and the overriding atmosphere I remember was one of warmth and tranquility.

Later on, my grandparents loved to take part in our family life, attending regular Sunday lunches at Hamsell Manor, our house in Sussex. And my grandmother always graced children’s parties, normally playing the role of Prize Giver.

Chartwell was Churchill’s sanctuary and Clementine endured her country exile for his sake because of it. After his death in 1965, however, she left it in the safe hands of the National Trust and moved to London to live out the rest of her days in a lovely flat overlooking Hyde Park.


Fiercely loyal she may have been, but Clementine was also sharply critical of her husband when no one else dared, and would rip into him if his standards of behaviour slipped


When I was in my last year of school in London, I would have tea with my grandmother every week, enjoying a delicious array of tiny sandwiches and rich chocolate cake.

Clementine was curious to know about my academic life, how my French was progressing and telling me, to my amazement, that I should be learning Mandarin: even in the early Sixties she saw the influence that China would exert in my lifetime.

And she was thrilled once to meet ‘Emma’s young man’, a friend who was taking me that day to Royal Ascot. She greatly approved of him in his pale grey tailcoat, but not of my effort, lending me a pair of white kid gloves to upgrade my outfit.

Nothing gives me more pleasure than to see Clementine, in Darkest Hour, assume the prominence she so deserves as an independent life force without whom my grandfather would not have reached the summit of greatness.

We have always revered Clementine for the part she played in his and, indeed, our lives, for the wise counsel and her fierce loyalty.


In addition to Gary Oldman, the film features Lily James, Ben Mendelsohn, Stephen Dillane and Kristin Scott Thomas


And Churchill recognised this. On their 40th wedding anniversary in 1948, he gave her a present with a note that read: ‘how little [this token] can express my gratitude to you for making my life and any work I have done possible, and for giving me so much happiness in a world of accident and storm.’

Nor did it surprise me to find in my late mother’s papers, hundreds of letters of condolence to her following Clementine’s death, peacefully at home, aged 92 in 1977.

They include letters and telegrams from the Queen, the Queen Mother, Jimmy Carter, then U.S. president, former U.S. Secretary of State Henry Kissinger, and numerous world leaders.

Then, the free world recognised the debt it owed Clementine — and now it is wonderful for a new generation to be reminded of it.
 
Last edited:

Curious Cdn

Hall of Fame Member
Feb 22, 2015
37,070
8
36
Randolph looks like an arrogant twit in one of those photos. I understand that he was, too.
 

Blackleaf

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 9, 2004
49,923
1,908
113
Randolph looks like an arrogant twit in one of those photos. I understand that he was, too.

It was Randolph who warned people about the Nazis as early as 1932.

Here's the movie I'm watching tonight:


Apart from the fact that it's riddled with historical inaccuracies - that half-American Churchill was anti-American and that he opposed D-Day - it's still supposed to be quite good.
 

taxslave

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 25, 2008
36,362
4,340
113
Vancouver Island
My wife has family that is stranded on blackie's god forsaken little rock. Her aunt was one of Churchill's secretaries during WW2.
 

DaSleeper

Trolling Hypocrites
May 27, 2007
33,676
1,666
113
Northern Ontario,
Around the year 2000 I belonged to a now defunct forum called the "grapevine" .
There was this member "Sid V" an old man who was a child in London at the beginning of the war
Once in a while he would write something like a blog that he called his memoirs of the war.
http://forums.canadiancontent.net/members/idratherbeskiing.htmlIdRatherBeSkying will probably remember him...
I liked his stories so much that before the forum shut down in 2007, I made a copy of all his "memoirs" that I could find and uploaded it to Box.net an FTP site for safekeeping...
If Ski or any of the old members would like a copy, I would be happy to provide the link for downloading in PDF or .doc form!
Then maybe Ski can post it on the old vine facebook page...or I could if I can figure how to do it...:lol:
 

Hoid

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 15, 2017
20,408
4
36
It is an historical revision to present Churchill as anything but a long serving parliamentarian to managed a government. He was not a powerful leader. He was a bureaucrat whose personal popularity was forever decapitated by his tragically stupid actions the the First World War, and who was thrown out of office just as soon as the public was allowed to vote.
 

darkbeaver

the universe is electric
Jan 26, 2006
41,035
201
63
RR1 Distopia 666 Discordia
Blackleaf has an uncanny ability to embrace bullshjt. Churchhill would regularly shjt himself in Parliament and was a despicable liar and murdered with the stroke of a pen. BLs main sorce of info seems to be the cinima.
 
Last edited:

Blackleaf

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 9, 2004
49,923
1,908
113
As Darkest Hours hits cinemas here's a guide to Churchill on screen, from the brilliant The Wilderness Years (1981) to the lamentable and historically inaccurate Churchill (2017)...

Arts feature

Andrew Roberts’s guide to Churchill on screen


From Soviet propaganda and revisionist nonsense to Simon Ward and Gary Oldman: the best and worst Churchills on film and TV

Andrew Roberts



Premier performance: Gary Oldman as Winston Churchill in Darkest Hour


Andrew Roberts
13 January 2018
The Spectator

Gary Oldman has joined a long list of actors who have portrayed Winston Churchill — no fewer than 35 of them in movies and 28 on television. He is one of the best three. ‘I knew I didn’t look like him,’ Oldman has said. ‘I thought that with some work I could approximate the voice. The challenge in part was the physicality, because you’re playing someone whose silhouette is so iconic.’

We all have our own mind’s-eye view of what Churchill should look and sound like, and his personality was so strong and sui generis that it is almost impossible for an actor to impose himself on the role. He is therefore almost always left with either mere impersonation or caricature. Oldman avoided this in Darkest Hour through research. ‘I went to the newsreel,’ he says, ‘and what I discovered was a man who had this very athletic tread. He would skip around at 65 like a 30-year-old. He had a sparkle. The eyes were alive. He had a very sort of cherubic grin.’

This is an insight that a number of actors who play Churchill — who came to power in 1940 aged 65 — have missed, and who thus play him as a man in late middle age. Sir Jock Colville, Churchill’s wartime private secretary, who was 41 years younger than him, wrote of how exhausting it was to keep up with the Prime Minister as he bounded up staircases, climbed bombsites and marched quickly down corridors. Oldman catches this. Others have played what Oldman calls ‘this sort of rather depressed grumpy man with a cigar’, but he wanted to ‘give him a bit of a twinkle in the eye’.

Churchill was depicted on the silver screen half a decade before he even became prime minister. The first time was in Royal Cavalcade (1935), when he was played neutrally in the movie made to celebrate King George V’s silver jubilee. The next was in Goebbels’s propaganda film Ohm Krüger (1941), about the British invention of concentration camps in the Boer War, where he of course is evil personified. Scarcely less believable were the four Soviet propaganda movies of the late 1940s — that is, after Churchill’s Iron Curtain speech that denounced Stalinism — in which Viktor Stanitsyn played Churchill as a scheming, grasping imperialist. There was an American movie, Mission to Moscow (1943), made at President Roosevelt’s request, which was naturally far kinder, but not really any more useful as an insight into Churchill.

After two movies in which Churchill appeared in cameo roles, played by Patrick Wymark and Jimmy Sangster, Simon Ward played the eponymous Young Winston in the 1972 film based on Churchill’s autobiography My Early Life. Written and produced by the genius Carl Foreman (High Noon, Guns of Navarone) and directed by Richard Attenborough, it was sublime. (I saw it recently yet again on the big screen, and it still is.) Ward captured Churchill’s courage and adventurousness, but also his occasional youthful bumptiousness.

Although Warren Clarke played a creditable Churchill in the seven-part TV series Jennie (1974) — in which Ronald Pickup, who is a convincing Neville Chamberlain in Darkest Hour, played Lord Randolph Churchill, — the next series overshadowed it. Richard Burton was perhaps too handsome to play Churchill in the The Gathering Storm (1974), but the script was historically accurate, whereas his off-camera remarks about despising Churchill for what he had supposedly done to the Welsh miners were not. Burton had a weird love-hate relationship with Churchill — other statements he made were admiring — but fortunately he stuck to the well-crafted script.

The advantage that the TV biopics of the 1970s had over today’s knocking, sneering revisionist movies — which Darkest Hour emphatically is not — was that there were many people still alive in 1974 who knew and worked with Churchill. They could pour scorn on inaccuracies, as could audiences.

Still the best depiction of Churchill on a screen is in the eight-part TV series The Wilderness Years (1981), in which Robert Hardy inhabited the part of Churchill to such a degree that it affected everything else he did to a greater or lesser extent. (Can one see something of Churchill in Hardy’s depiction of the Minister of Magic in Harry Potter?) Hardy’s profound reading about Churchill, and friendship with Sir Martin Gilbert, Churchill’s biographer, helped make the series the success it was, and set the standard for everything that followed. It also allowed Hardy to reprise Churchill in War and Remembrance (1988 ), Bomber Harris (1989) and The Sittaford Mystery (2006).

Other very good Churchills have been Albert Finney in The Gathering Storm (2002), which rightly picked up a Golden Globe and Emmy, and Brendan Gleeson in Into the Storm (2009). Just as things looked good for Churchill on screen, however, a slew of frankly ridiculous revisionist films and TV shows were released, which, with the wartime generation then dead or dying, showed a shocking disregard for historical fact, while still posing as that self-contradictory, want-it-both-ways beast, the ‘docudrama’.

In The Crown (2016), the six-foot-four John Lithgow stoops to play a semi-senile Churchill (who was five-foot-six and certainly not senile), who deliberately murders 12,000 Londoners by not adopting green anti-global warming measures to defeat the London fog in 1952. He is also portrayed lying to the Queen about his stroke in 1953, whereas she was one of the first to be told about it. Similarly, Michael Gambon’s portrayal in Churchill’s Secret (2016) was ruined by unhistorical twaddle. I walked out of Quentin Tarantino’s lamentable Inglourious Basterds (2009) so I can’t report on Rod Tayor’s role as Churchill.

Easily the worst Churchill movie ever made was Churchill (2017), in which Brian Cox played a prime minister desperate to see D-Day fail. (Yes, you read that correctly.) I counted 120 historical inaccuracies in those two hours of my life I’ll never get back. Off-camera Cox spouted a series of ludicrous views about Churchill — such as that he wanted to invade Germany over the Alps — which showed that he had swallowed the views of the scriptwriter, Alex von Tunzelman, rather than doing his own research into the truth about Churchill.


The worst Churchill movie ever made

Gary Oldman, by total contrast, has, through prosthetics, thoughtfulness and superb acting, caught Churchill brilliantly. He acknowledges our preconceptions about Churchill, and mildly co-opts them with charm and acuity. The supporting cast — especially Kristin Scott Thomas as Clementine and Sam West as Anthony Eden — are excellent too. Although there have been very many other creditable Churchills — David Ryall, Mel Smith, Timothy Spall, David Calder and Bob Hoskins among them — Gary Oldman now joins Robert Hardy and Simon Ward in the triumvirate of the greats.

Darkest Hour is in cinemas now.

https://www.spectator.co.uk/2018/01/andrew-robertss-guide-to-churchill-on-screen/
 
Last edited:

Blackleaf

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 9, 2004
49,923
1,908
113

darkbeaver

the universe is electric
Jan 26, 2006
41,035
201
63
RR1 Distopia 666 Discordia
And was voted back in again in 1951.
An article above talks about historical revisionism when it comes to Churchill and you're guilty of the same thing.
At no point in his life did Churchill utter that "quote".

Historical revisionism is a very good thing I am engaged in that revision I am not guilty of it. We either revise or we make the same mistakes again. You cannot possibly know what Churchill did or did not say unless it was recorded and that quote fits that drunken slob to a tee. You are definitely a victim of unrevised history. It seems that your personal rehabilitation will not take place since you refuse to believe that the greater part of history is absolute rubbish designed and diseminated to martial specimins like yourself with respect to the proper method of mounting a railcar to a south sea island parradise.
Top of the morning to you sir average voter and have a very good day.