As to Spain- Euro money is it not?
Sure, but the impression the government wants to give now is that austerity is the best policy.
As to Spain- Euro money is it not?
Sure, but the impression the government wants to give now is that austerity is the best policy.
No big recession yet- and it may be avoided if the EU get their shxt together- this EU mess has had bandaids placed on it for the last 2 1/2 years- Politicians cannot get it together.
Which brings us back full circle. The opposition are criticizing Harper for not taking an active role in getting EU to develop a fiscal plan or at least having EU members co-operate collectively on this.
It will not be like the last one
As to Spain- Euro money is it not?
Which brings us back full circle. The opposition are criticizing Harper for not taking an active role in getting EU to develop a fiscal plan or at least having EU members co-operate collectively on this.
The inconsistency is quite amusing.
If there is a war, Canada needs to step up and contribute to global security, no matter what cost, no matter how many lives.
But if there is a financial crisis, instead of being a responsible member of the global community, Canada is to sit back and say 'not our problem'
I guess without Boeing and Lockheed-Martin telling paying lobbyists to influence politicians, there is no appetite for global stability.
The inconsistency is quite amusing.
If there is a war, Canada needs to step up and contribute to global security, no matter what cost, no matter how many lives.
But if there is a financial crisis, instead of being a responsible member of the global community, Canada is to sit back and say 'not our problem'
I guess without Boeing and Lockheed-Martin telling paying lobbyists to influence politicians, there is no appetite for global stability.
Beats comparisons to Nazi's, all the, any and every time....;-)And so here it is folks.
This is where the losing argument finally reaches its point of desperation.
"YA WELL RUB N TUGS AN MORTGAGE WOES!!11"
This is great stuff cap. Keep up the good work! :lol:
We already know from 2008 that he loves bailout packages.
Why sure let's pony up some cash for countries with records of reckless spending to rival that of Lindsay Lohan. Germany has tried to drop the hammer on them but they insist on trying to maintain their entitlement behaviour in the face of a complete meltdown of their little paradise of early retirement and no taxation.
We don't have Boeing and Lockheed-Martin sucking us dry up here we have Bombardier firmly attached to the Federal teat.
As to Canada "needing to step up" well let's just say that when it comes to global security as an genuine, affirmed issue we've demonstrated we're right there in the front lines time and time again. Now all we need is a genuine threat to global security as opposed to the "terrorists are coming, the terrorists are coming".
"Responsible member of the global community" you're chitting me aren't you? Peacekeeping, Haiti relief, Somalia pirate patrol, Libya liberation, what more would you have us get involved in that we could reasonably afford and still you suggest we should throw money down a latrine called Europe?
The same countries whose leader shouted Vive-le-Quebec-Libre from a Canadian balcony for which we have yet to receive an apology given that phony propped-up popinjay general was in Canada by invitation, who were claiming our seal hunt was barbaric, our oil sands are ruining their envrionment, who attempted to overfish our territorial waters until we confiscated one of their fishing vessles to which they responded with outrage.
Let the stupid bastards beg for coins in the street like everyone else who spent their inheritance in the casino.
Mulcair can kiss my patoot just like that retarded Rhodes Scholar of a temporary Liberal leader who agreed not to run for the leadership if he accepted the temp chair but who now wants to take a run at it; reneging is something he knows a lot about. While we're at it with the public purse being raided by these guys; how about Jackie boy and Olivia doubling up on the housing allowance allowed MP's while living in Ottawa, and still billing the public purse for returning to Toronto every weekend or, how about them putting their Toronto house in her mother's name so it would qualify for housing assistance while they were both sitting city counsellors.
Yeah I'm real likely to be shamed into contributing to Europes welfare at the behest of the likes of any politician, especially one of the Mulcair stripe. NUTS!
BruSan- Could you tell him what you really think-
Naah; I'll leave it at the post I've already made! Haaar! Got lot's more where that came from though.
His personal debt situation is also a reflection of his philosophy and Mulcair wants to be PM. There is a strong possibility that this same/similar philosophy may be extended onto the way that he envisions Canada should be run.
Must be the most expensive house ever.You mean he mortgaged his house to bail out Greece?
It is time to curb the banks and speculators with concrete rules where
violations would require serious jail time. The governments have cause
most of the mess, but bond speculators and others are also responsible.
It is obvious that the banks and financial institutions and the governments
themselves need regulation.
One group had unfettered access to too much money
and the the banks, and financial institutions did not do their due diligence in lending
to nations that could not pay.
Mulcair understands we are going to have to help out or go under but he is a little
carried away in having us supply too much money. America will be helping and so
will China and Germany before this is over. Its save the Euro or we all suffer and to
save the Euro, it will be mandatory to save the deb ted European nations.
First of all I am not for Canada bailing out Europe with that kind of money.
"There is a bigger picture here though folks. Europe needs not billions but
at least six trillion and maybe slightly more. If the world does not find the
assistance money we are all going under and that includes Canada."
That's one avenue of thought.
The other involves just how much economic gain we've had with ability to capitalize on the active markets to date, and how much of that profit we now have to HAND BACK in the form of a handout to Europe that will result in a massive addition to our national debt.
Add to that the softening in markets that will result in a close call being narrowly averted with every investor now playing it safe and where will the pain be the least? Like tearing off a bandage.
We throw a lot of the gains we've made over the last few years into a giant pot on the table and double down our bet only to watch a successful bailout bring with it the three other players leaving the table to take shelter in the bar.
Kinda hard to get your investment back when everyone's got a lock on their wallets AFTER the bailouts.
Take the pain of a recession or even a full blown depression now or suffer a longer term softening of the markets for years to come AFTER spending a wad of our successful profits giving money back to those very places we made the gains from over the last few years.
Saying we can't afford to NOT bail them out is like saying the car someone else owns, that we are car-pooling to commute with, needs a new engine and we cannot afford to lose our job but it's a 20 year old car. Perhaps it's finally time to scrap the car and ride the bus at a higher cost 'til the owner of the car who should have been putting some of our pool payments in the bank to cover the maintenace costs figures out how he's going to get HIS car fixed.
First of all I am not for Canada bailing out Europe with that kind of money."There is a bigger picture here though folks. Europe needs not billions but
at least six trillion and maybe slightly more. If the world does not find the
assistance money we are all going under and that includes Canada."
That's one avenue of thought.
The other involves just how much economic gain we've had with ability to capitalize on the active markets to date, and how much of that profit we now have to HAND BACK in the form of a handout to Europe that will result in a massive addition to our national debt.
Add to that the softening in markets that will result in a close call being narrowly averted with every investor now playing it safe and where will the pain be the least? Like tearing off a bandage.
We throw a lot of the gains we've made over the last few years into a giant pot on the table and double down our bet only to watch a successful bailout bring with it the three other players leaving the table to take shelter in the bar.
Kinda hard to get your investment back when everyone's got a lock on their wallets AFTER the bailouts.
Take the pain of a recession or even a full blown depression now or suffer a longer term softening of the markets for years to come AFTER spending a wad of our successful profits giving money back to those very places we made the gains from over the last few years.
Saying we can't afford to NOT bail them out is like saying the car someone else owns, that we are car-pooling to commute with, needs a new engine and we cannot afford to lose our job but it's a 20 year old car. Perhaps it's finally time to scrap the car and ride the bus at a higher cost 'til the owner of the car who should have been putting some of our pool payments in the bank to cover the maintenace costs figures out how he's going to get HIS car fixed.
Like the car analogy - The EU has been placing band aids on this problem for the past 2 1/2 years- For the Greece bailout -I believe it needed approval of 26 or 27 Govt's.- So a small country like the Czech republic has the power to turn it down- affecting every other country that had agreed - Much like the 1st Polish Parliament- 1 can turn it off- the mechanisms that the US had and still have available are not in the EU powers- The plan to take 10 years for fiscal integration is ludicrous- Much to long as the markets today will be sluggish for years- And the bond markets will hang them. Also the EU has more fiscal bailouts coming- Italy next- France follows - Either they reform and pass Fiscal Integration quickly - with stringent penalties- or the EU of today will fail and be much smaller. Europe will then again be divided - Rich and poor countries- Exactly what the EU was designed and meant to prevent.