Motherisk hair testing ‘unfair and harmful’ to the poorest and most vulnerable

petros

The Central Scrutinizer
Nov 21, 2008
117,624
14,362
113
Low Earth Orbit
After identifying 56 cases where families were “broken apart,” Motherisk Commission calls for sweeping changes in a report with 32 recommendations to “help ensure that no family suffers a similar injustice in the future.”

Ontario’s Motherisk Commission is calling for significant changes to the province’s child protection system after identifying 56 cases where families were “broken apart” due to ’s flawed hair-strand drug and alcohol testing.

In her report released today, Commissioner Judith Beaman described the reliance in child protection cases on the flawed testing, which was produced at a once-trusted lab at Toronto’s Hospital for Sick Children, as “manifestly unfair and harmful.”

“The testing was imposed on people who were among the poorest and most vulnerable members of our society, with scant regard for due process of their rights to privacy and bodily integrity,” Beaman said in her report released today, entitled Harmful Impacts. “The discovery that unreliable test results were used as expert evidence in child protection proceedings for so many years undermines the public’s confidence in the fairness of our justice system, particularly with respect to how it treats vulnerable people.”

As the Star has reported, Motherisk’s discredited hair testing influenced at least eight criminal cases and thousands of child protection cases across the country, beginning in the 1990s. Sick Kids made millions from the hair tests, which were purchased by more than 100 child welfare providers in five provinces, who relied on the results primarily as proof of parental substance abuse.

Beaman found that Motherisk’s testing disproportionately impacted Indigenous families, who were involved in nearly 15 per cent of the 1,291 cases the commission reviewed, despite making up less than 3 per cent of Ontario’s population.

https://www.thestar.com/news/gta/20...ul-to-families-in-child-protection-cases.html
 

Dixie Cup

Senate Member
Sep 16, 2006
6,326
4,026
113
Edmonton
Wow - seriously? I thought there was much better more accurate ways to determine drug use. Isn't this "old school"?


Huh! Who knew?


Dix
 

petros

The Central Scrutinizer
Nov 21, 2008
117,624
14,362
113
Low Earth Orbit
“The testing was imposed on people who were among the poorest and most vulnerable members of our society, with scant regard for due process of their rights to privacy and bodily integrity,”

But drunk and stoned kids raising kids to be drunk and stoned is just fine.
 

OpposingDigit

Electoral Member
Aug 27, 2017
903
0
16
Motherisk: Tainted Tests & Broken Families
It seemed so perfect, so scientific - a hair test that could objectively determine whether parents of young children were abusing drugs or alcohol. But it turns out the 'Motherisk' hair testing was flawed, and improperly administered all across Canada over twenty years. The results were devastating. Families broken up, children seized and irrevocably adopted out. The Fifth Estate tracked down parents who share stories for the first time on Tainted Tests: Broken Families. Mark Kelley reports. A joint investigation with the Toronto Star and CBC Radio’s The Current.
CBC - The Fifth Estate
Host Mark Kelley
October 20, 2017
(Flash Video)
Motherisk: Tainted Tests & Broken Families - The Fifth Estate - CBC News
(YouTube Video)